Paper · 2023 · Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia

EFFECTIVENESS OF VERMICOMPOST IN SUBSTITUTING UREA FOR PROMOTING GROWTH AND YIELDS OF MUNG BEAN (Vigna radiata L.) IN ULTISOLS

Evendi Tri Mulyono; Hesti Pujiwati; Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Vermicompost is one of increasingly applied organic fertilizer to many vegetable crops in order to reduce the dependency on synthetic fertilizer, including the use of urea as nitrogen source. This experiment aimed to determine the best dosage combination of vermicompost and synthetic urea on growth and yields of mung bean grown in Ultisols. This experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Treatments consisted of (1) control, no urea and no vermicompost, (2) 50 kg/ha urea + no vermicompost, (3) 40 kg/ha urea + 3 Mg/ha vermicompost, (4) 30 kg/ha urea + 6 Mg/ha vermicompost, (5) 20 kg/ha urea + 9 Mg/ha vermicompost, (6) 10 kg/ha urea + 12 Mg/ha vermicompost, and (7) 0 kg/ha urea + 15 Mg/ha vermicompost. Results indicated that the combination of urea and vermicompost increased plant height, leaf number, branch number, number of nodules/plant, shoot to root ratio, number of pods/plant, number of pods/plot, grain dry weight/plant, grain dry weight/plot, and total yield /ha, but not days to flowering and weight of 100 grains. The best combination to increased growth and yields of mung bean was 12 Mg/ha of vermicompost in combination with 10 kg/ha of urea. This combination produced the highest grain yields/ha (2.1 Mg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined urea and vermicompost increased vegetative growth traits and nodules of mung bean.

Taxon
MUNG BEANVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combination of urea and vermicomposte0
Outcome
plant height, leaf number, branch numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of urea and vermicompost increased plant height, leaf number, branch number, number of nodules/plant, shoot to root ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNG BEAN (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined urea and vermicompost increased the number of nodules per plant.

Taxon
MUNG BEANVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combination of urea and vermicomposte0
Outcome
number of nodules/plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of urea and vermicompost increased plant height, leaf number, branch number, number of nodules/plant, shoot to root ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNG BEAN (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined urea and vermicompost increased the shoot to root ratio.

Taxon
MUNG BEANVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combination of urea and vermicomposte0
Outcome
shoot to root ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of urea and vermicompost increased plant height, leaf number, branch number, number of nodules/plant, shoot to root ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNG BEAN (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined urea and vermicompost increased pod counts per plant and plot.

Taxon
MUNG BEANVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combination of urea and vermicomposte0
Outcome
number of pods/plant, number of pods/plote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of urea and vermicompost increased plant height, leaf number, branch number, number of nodules/plant, shoot to root ratio, number of pods/plant, number of pods/plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNG BEAN (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined urea and vermicompost increased grain dry weight per plant and plot and total yield.

Taxon
MUNG BEANVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combination of urea and vermicomposte1
Outcome
grain dry weight/plant, grain dry weight/plot, and total yield /hae0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain dry weight/plant, grain dry weight/plot, and total yield /ha, but not days to flowering and weight of 100 grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of urea and vermicompost increased plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNG BEAN (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined urea and vermicompost did not increase flowering time or 100 grain weight.

Taxon
MUNG BEANVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combination of urea and vermicomposte1
Outcome
days to flowering and weight of 100 grainse0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not days to flowering and weight of 100 grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combination of urea and vermicompost increased plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNG BEAN (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 12 Mg/ha vermicompost plus 10 kg/ha urea combination gave the highest grain yield of 2.1 Mg/ha.

Taxon
MUNG BEANVigna radiatat0
Treatment
12 Mg/ha of vermicompost in combination with 10 kg/ha of ureae0
Outcome
grain yields/hae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.1 Mg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12 Mg/ha of vermicompost in combination with 10 kg/ha of urea. This combination produced the highest grain yields/ha (2.1 Mg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNG BEAN (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–114 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.