Paper · 2023 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Coupling the interactive effects of solar radiation, temperature and nitrogen on performance of transplanted rice

Garima; S. S. Sandhu; M. S. Bons; et al.

17
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiment to assess the impact of radiation, temperature and foliar N application on rice was conducted. The treatments comprised of four sunlight levels, [control, 50% intensity during start to maximum tillering (R 15–45 ), maximum tillering to booting (R 46–75 ) and panicle emergence to maturity (R 76–105 ) corresponding to 15–45, 46–75 and 76–105 days after transplanting] and 5 levels of foliar nitrogen [control, spray of 3% urea solution in water before (N B ), midway (N M ), afterwards (N A ) and midway + afterwards (N MA ) reduction in sunlight]. Results showed that leaf chlorophyll had an inverse relationship with radiation intensity. The R 46–75 significantly reduced effective tillers (13.1–16.4%), R 46–75 and R 76–105 reduced grains/panicle (7.15–12.5%) as compared to control. N B produced significantly higher effective tillers (21.9–24.7%) and grains/panicle (12.2–12.9%) as compared to control. The reduction in sunlight and application of foliar nitrogen increased the minimum cooking time and decreased elongation ratio. Averaged over locations, R 15–45 , R 46–75 and R 76–105 decreased the yield significantly as compared to control by 9.29–11.3, 14.4–16.3 and 8.17–10.6%, respectively. The N B significantly increased grain yield as compared to control by 10.3% (Ludhiana) and 9.45% (Hoshiarpur). A decrease in maximum temperature ( T max ) by 2.85–5.70% (1–2°C) of 35.1°C, at 1416 μmol/m 2 /s of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) increased rice productivity by 10.6–21.0%, while a similar decrease in PAR by 2.85–5.70% at a T max of 35.1°C, decreased the productivity by 2.05–4.10%. So, decrease in T max due to cloudy weather might have a positive influence while negative impact of deficit radiation may be mitigated by foliar application of 3% urea prior to/during the cloudy weather.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice leaf chlorophyll was inversely related to radiation intensity.

Treatment
radiation intensitye0
Outcome
leaf chlorophylle0
Direction
inverse relationshipe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“leaf chlorophyll had an inverse relationship with radiation intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R 46–75 reduced effective tillers by 13.1–16.4% compared with control.

Treatment
R 46–75e0
Outcome
effective tillerse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13.1–16.4%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“R 46–75 significantly reduced effective tillers (13.1–16.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R 46–75 and R 76–105 reduced grains per panicle by 7.15–12.5%.

Treatment
R 46–75 and R 76–105e0
Outcome
grains/paniclee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.15–12.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“R 46–75 and R 76–105 reduced grains/panicle (7.15–12.5%) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N B increased effective tillers by 21.9–24.7% compared with control.

Treatment
N Be0
Outcome
effective tillerse0
Direction
highere0
Value
21.9–24.7%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“N B produced significantly higher effective tillers (21.9–24.7%) and grains/panicle (12.2–12.9%) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N B increased grains per panicle by 12.2–12.9% compared with control.

Treatment
N Be0
Outcome
grains/paniclee0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.2–12.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“N B produced significantly higher effective tillers (21.9–24.7%) and grains/panicle (12.2–12.9%) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced sunlight increased minimum cooking time.

Treatment
reduction in sunlighte0
Outcome
minimum cooking timee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in sunlight and application of foliar nitrogen increased the minimum cooking time and decreased elongation ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen increased minimum cooking time.

Treatment
application of foliar nitrogene0
Outcome
minimum cooking timee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in sunlight and application of foliar nitrogen increased the minimum cooking time and decreased elongation ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced sunlight decreased elongation ratio.

Treatment
reduction in sunlighte0
Outcome
elongation ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in sunlight and application of foliar nitrogen increased the minimum cooking time and decreased elongation ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen decreased elongation ratio.

Treatment
application of foliar nitrogene0
Outcome
elongation ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in sunlight and application of foliar nitrogen increased the minimum cooking time and decreased elongation ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R 15–45 decreased yield by 9.29–11.3 relative to control.

Treatment
R 15–45e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
9.29–11.3e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“R 15–45 , R 46–75 and R 76–105 decreased the yield significantly as compared to control by 9.29–11.3, 14.4–16.3 and 8.17–10.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R 46–75 decreased yield by 14.4–16.3 relative to control.

Treatment
R 46–75e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
14.4–16.3e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“R 15–45 , R 46–75 and R 76–105 decreased the yield significantly as compared to control by 9.29–11.3, 14.4–16.3 and 8.17–10.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R 76–105 decreased yield by 8.17–10.6% relative to control.

Treatment
R 76–105e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8.17–10.6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“R 15–45 , R 46–75 and R 76–105 decreased the yield significantly as compared to control by 9.29–11.3, 14.4–16.3 and 8.17–10.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N B raised grain yield by 10.3% in Ludhiana.

Treatment
N Be0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.3%e0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
Ludhianae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The N B significantly increased grain yield as compared to control by 10.3% (Ludhiana) and 9.45% (Hoshiarpur)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N B raised grain yield by 9.45% in Hoshiarpur.

Treatment
N Be0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.45%e0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
Hoshiarpure0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The N B significantly increased grain yield as compared to control by 10.3% (Ludhiana) and 9.45% (Hoshiarpur)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2.85–5.70% drop in maximum temperature increased rice productivity by 10.6–21.0%.

Treatment
decrease in maximum temperature ( T max ) by 2.85–5.70% (1–2°C)e0
Outcome
rice productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.6–21.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in maximum temperature ( T max ) by 2.85–5.70% (1–2°C) of 35.1°C, at 1416 μmol/m 2 /s of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) increased rice productivity by 10.6–21.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2.85–5.70% PAR drop decreased productivity by 2.05–4.10%.

Treatment
decrease in PAR by 2.85–5.70%e0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.05–4.10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“a similar decrease in PAR by 2.85–5.70% at a T max of 35.1°C, decreased the productivity by 2.05–4.10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1633 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 3% foliar urea before or during cloudy weather to mitigate radiation deficits.

Outcome
foliar application of 3% urea prior to/during the cloudy weathere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“negative impact of deficit radiation may be mitigated by foliar application of 3% urea prior to/during the cloudy weather”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1838 · show in text ↑

radiation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

43 papers: 27 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.