Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Effect of Iron Nutrition on Growth and Productivity of Aerobic Rice (Oryza sativa)

B. Soumya; K. P. Vani; K. Surekha

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif seasons (June–October) of 2012 and 2013 at College Farm, College of Agriculture, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, Telengana, India to evaluate the response of rice cultivars and iron nutrition on growth and yield of aerobic rice. Experiment comprising of three rice cultivars (Tellahamsa, MTU 1010 and KRH 2) and twelve sources and modes of iron nutrition i.e. control (no iron), basal application of iron sulphate @ 25 kg ha-1, basal application of Iron chelate @ 25 kg ha-1, 3 foliar sprays of 2% iron sulphate @ 7 days interval, 3 foliar sprays of 2% iron sulphate @ 10 days interval and 3 foliar sprays of 2% iron sulphate @ 15 days interval. Next 3 treatments were three foliar sprays of 2% iron sulphate in conjunction with basal application of iron sulphate @ 25 kg ha-1. Subsequent treatments were three foliar sprays of 2% iron sulphate with basal combination of iron chelate @ 25 kg ha-1. Results indicated that among rice cultivars KRH 2 gave significantly better agronomic performance with respect to growth parameters and yield. Iron nutrition treatments significantly affected the plant height, tillers, dry matter accumulation and yield of aerobic rice. Basal application of iron chelate @ 25 kg ha-1 with 3 foliar sprays of iron sulphate at 7 days interval produced tallest plants, maximum number of tillers, accumulated highest dry matter and produced maximum yield during both the years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

KRH 2 had significantly better growth and yield than the other rice cultivars.

Material
KRH 2e0e1t0
Outcome
growth parameters and yielde0e1t0
Direction
bettere0e1t0
Comparator
rice cultivarse0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among rice cultivars KRH 2 gave significantly better agronomic performance with respect to growth parameters and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (no iron)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aerobic Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron nutrition treatments significantly affected rice height, tillers, dry matter and yield.

Treatment
Iron nutrition treatmentse0e1t0
Outcome
plant height, tillers, dry matter accumulation and yielde0e1t0
Comparator
control (no iron)e0e1t0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron nutrition treatments significantly affected the plant height, tillers, dry matter accumulation and yield of aerobic rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1256 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (no iron)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aerobic Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal iron chelate plus foliar iron sulphate at seven-day intervals produced the tallest plants and most tillers.

Treatment
Basal application of iron chelate @ 25 kg ha-1 with 3 foliar sprays of iron sulphate at 7 days intervale0e1t0
Outcome
tallest plants, maximum number of tillerse0e1t0
Direction
maximume0e1t0
Qualifier
during both the yearse0e1t0
Comparator
control (no iron)e0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Basal application of iron chelate @ 25 kg ha-1 with 3 foliar sprays of iron sulphate at 7 days interval produced tallest plants, maximum number of tillers, accumulated highest dry matter and produced maximum yield during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (no iron)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aerobic Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same iron treatment produced the highest dry matter and yield in both years.

Treatment
Basal application of iron chelate @ 25 kg ha-1 with 3 foliar sprays of iron sulphate at 7 days intervale0e1t0
Outcome
dry matter and produced maximum yielde0e1t0
Direction
maximume0e1t0
Qualifier
during both the yearse0e1t0
Comparator
control (no iron)e0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Basal application of iron chelate @ 25 kg ha-1 with 3 foliar sprays of iron sulphate at 7 days interval produced tallest plants, maximum number of tillers, accumulated highest dry matter and produced maximum yield during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (no iron)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aerobic Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–82 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

71 papers: 57 positive, 14 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
    Iron toxicity reduced rice yields by 16–78 %, averaging 43 %.

    Rice Yield Gap due to Iron Toxicity in West Africa · 2008 · compared with referential yield obtained in a non‐iron‐toxic site

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

sulfate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

iron chelate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.