Paper · 2023 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Residual effect of nitrogen management on succeeding summer moong (Vigna radiata) under maize-wheat-moong rotation

KARTIK SHARMA; S S WALIA; S S DHALIWAL; et al.

8
claims
25
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Nitrogen management in crop/cropping system plays a significant role to enhance crop growth and productivity in sustainable manner. To ensure sustained soil fertility, optimal crop growth and productivity in subsequent growing seasons, it is necessary to consider the residual effect of N management on moong (Vigna radiata L.). Therefore, a field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years (2019–20 and 2020–21) to evaluate the effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrition with/without residue retention applied to preceding crops on growth and productivity of succeeding moong. Fourteen treatments applied to preceding crops were, T1, 100% N through FYM without residue; T2, 100% N through FYM with residue; T3, 75% N through FYM + 25% RDF without residue; T4, 75% N through FYM + 25% RDF with residue; T5, 50% N through FYM + 50% RDF without residue; T6, 50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residue; T7, 25% N through FYM + 75% RDF without residue; T8, 25% N through FYM + 75% RDF with residue; T9, 100% RDF + 25% N extra through FYM without residue; T10, 100% RDF + 25% N extra through FYM with residue; T11, 100% RDF without residue; T12, 100% RDF with residue; T13, Cowpea intercropping without fertilizer in maize and residue retention in wheat and; T14, Control. The data revealed that treatment T6 recorded significantly higher growth parameters [plant height (59.7 cm) and dry matter accumulation (469.8 g/m2)] and yield attributes (number of pod/plant (27.4), pod length (8.8 cm) and number of seeds/pod (10.2)] of moong over other treatments but was found at par with T2, T3, T4 and T5 in 2020 and during 2021. Treatment T2 recorded significantly higher growth parameters [plant height (61.3 cm) and dry matter accumulation (478.9 g/m2)] and yield attributes (number of pod/ plant (30.2), pod length (8.9) and number of seeds/pod (10.3)] being at par with T1, T3, T4, T5 and T6 of moong over other treatments. Moreover, due to significant increase in yield attributes, treatment T6 and T2 exhibited significant increase in grain yield of about 62.32 and 62.96%, respectively over control in year 2020 and 2021, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T6 (50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residue) gave higher plant height than other treatments, 59.7 cm.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residuee2
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
59.7 cme1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data revealed that treatment T6 recorded significantly higher growth parameters [plant height (59.7 cm) and dry matter accumulation (469.8 g/m2)] and yield attributes (number of pod/plant (27.4), pod length (8.8 cm) and number of seeds/pod (10.2)] of moong over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1566 · show in text ↑
e2

“T6, 50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T6 gave higher dry matter accumulation than other treatments, 469.8 g/m2.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residuee2
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
highere1
Value
469.8 g/m2e1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data revealed that treatment T6 recorded significantly higher growth parameters [plant height (59.7 cm) and dry matter accumulation (469.8 g/m2)] and yield attributes (number of pod/plant (27.4), pod length (8.8 cm) and number of seeds/pod (10.2)] of moong over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1566 · show in text ↑
e2

“T6, 50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T6 gave more pods per plant than other treatments, 27.4.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residuee2
Outcome
number of pod/plante1
Direction
highere1
Value
27.4e1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data revealed that treatment T6 recorded significantly higher growth parameters [plant height (59.7 cm) and dry matter accumulation (469.8 g/m2)] and yield attributes (number of pod/plant (27.4), pod length (8.8 cm) and number of seeds/pod (10.2)] of moong over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1566 · show in text ↑
e2

“T6, 50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T6 gave longer pods than other treatments, 8.8 cm.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residuee2
Outcome
pod lengthe1
Direction
highere1
Value
8.8 cme1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data revealed that treatment T6 recorded significantly higher growth parameters [plant height (59.7 cm) and dry matter accumulation (469.8 g/m2)] and yield attributes (number of pod/plant (27.4), pod length (8.8 cm) and number of seeds/pod (10.2)] of moong over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1566 · show in text ↑
e2

“T6, 50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T6 gave more seeds per pod than other treatments, 10.2.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residuee2
Outcome
number of seeds/pode1
Direction
highere1
Value
10.2e1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data revealed that treatment T6 recorded significantly higher growth parameters [plant height (59.7 cm) and dry matter accumulation (469.8 g/m2)] and yield attributes (number of pod/plant (27.4), pod length (8.8 cm) and number of seeds/pod (10.2)] of moong over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1566 · show in text ↑
e2

“T6, 50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T6 gave about 62.32% higher grain yield than control in 2020.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residuee2
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
increasee5
Value
62.32e5
Qualifier
in year 2020e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“treatment T6 and T2 exhibited significant increase in grain yield of about 62.32 and 62.96%, respectively over control in year 2020 and 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1994–2134 · show in text ↑
e2

“T6, 50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T2 gave about 62.96% higher grain yield than control in 2021.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
100% N through FYM with residuee4
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
increasee5
Value
62.96e5
Qualifier
in year 2020 and 2021e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“treatment T6 and T2 exhibited significant increase in grain yield of about 62.32 and 62.96%, respectively over control in year 2020 and 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1994–2134 · show in text ↑
e4

“T2, 100% N through FYM with residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T6 was at par with T2, T3, T4 and T5 in growth parameters in 2020 and 2021.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residuee2
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
at pare6
Qualifier
in 2020 and during 2021e6
Comparator
T2, T3, T4 and T5e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data revealed that treatment T6 recorded significantly higher growth parameters [plant height (59.7 cm) and dry matter accumulation (469.8 g/m2)] and yield attributes (number of pod/plant (27.4), pod length (8.8 cm) and number of seeds/pod (10.2)] of moong over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1566 · show in text ↑
e2

“T6, 50% N through FYM + 50% RDF with residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–914 · show in text ↑
e6

“but was found at par with T2, T3, T4 and T5 in 2020 and during 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1634 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.