Paper · 2005 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Study of crop geometry, intercropping systems and nutrient management practices on weed density and yield in baby corn based intercropping systems

THAVAPRAKAASH N; VELAYUDHAM K; MUTHUKUMAR V.B

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during Kharif 2002 and summer 2003. The experimental soil was sandy clay loam with alkaline pH. The experiments were laid out in split plot design with three replications. The main pot consisted of two factors viz., crop geometry [45 x 25 cm (S_{1}) and 60 * 19 cm (S_{2}) | and intercropping systems [baby corn alone (C_{1}) baby corn + radish (C_{2}) and baby corn + coriander (C_{p}) ] Four integrated nutrient management practices ( N, - 100% of the recommended dose of NPK (150:60:40 kg ha) of baby corn; N_{2} - 50% NPK of baby corn + FYM + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria; N_{2} - 50% NPK of baby corn + Poultry manure + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria; N_{4} - 50% NPK of baby corn + Goat manure + Azospirillum + Phosphobacterial were assigned to sub plots. The experimental results revealed that weed population and weed DMP were higher with S_{2} than S i* Sole crop situation resulted higher weed population and weed DMP than intercropped baby corn. Baby corn with inorganic fertilizer recorded the lowest weed population and weed DMP than INM treated baby corn. The results were reverse for Weed Smothering Efficiency. Green cob yield of baby corn was higher (7976 and 7519 kg h * x ^ - 1 ) with S * than S_{r} Intercropping systems failed to influence the green cob yield. Combined use of a half NPK with poultry or goat manures along with bio-fertilizers (Azospirillum and Phosphobacteria) has produced significantly higher baby corn yield as compared to N, and N_{t} during both the seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider S2 geometry had greater weed population and weed dry matter.

Taxon
baby cornt0
Treatment
S_{2}e0
Outcome
weed population and weed DMPe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
S i*e0

Verbatim

e0

“weed population and weed DMP were higher with S_{2} than S i*”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study of crop geometry, intercropping systems and nutrient management practices on weed density and yield in baby corn based intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cropping had greater weed population and dry matter than intercropped baby corn.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
Sole crope0
Outcome
weed population and weed DMPe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropped baby corne0

Verbatim

e0

“Sole crop situation resulted higher weed population and weed DMP than intercropped baby corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer gave the lowest weed population and dry matter relative to integrated nutrition.

Taxon
Baby corne0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
weed population and weed DMPe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
INM treated baby corne0

Verbatim

e0

“Baby corn with inorganic fertilizer recorded the lowest weed population and weed DMP than INM treated baby corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed smothering efficiency showed the reverse pattern of weed population and dry matter.

Taxon
baby cornt0
Outcome
Weed Smothering Efficiencye0
Direction
reversee0

Verbatim

e0

“The results were reverse for Weed Smothering Efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study of crop geometry, intercropping systems and nutrient management practices on weed density and yield in baby corn based intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S* geometry gave higher green cob yield than S_r, with values 7976 and 7519 kg h * x ^ - 1.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
S *e0
Outcome
Green cob yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
7976 and 7519 kg h * x ^ - 1e0
Comparator
S_{r}e0

Verbatim

e0

“Green cob yield of baby corn was higher (7976 and 7519 kg h * x ^ - 1 ) with S * than S_{r}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not influence green cob yield.

Taxon
baby cornt0
Treatment
Intercropping systemse0
Outcome
green cob yielde0
Direction
failed to influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping systems failed to influence the green cob yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study of crop geometry, intercropping systems and nutrient management practices on weed density and yield in baby corn based intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Half-rate NPK with poultry manure and biofertilizers increased baby corn yield significantly relative to N, and N_t.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
half NPK with poultrye0
Interactor
Azospirillum and Phosphobacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
baby corn yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
N, and N_{t}e0

Verbatim

e0

“Combined use of a half NPK with poultry or goat manures along with bio-fertilizers (Azospirillum and Phosphobacteria) has produced significantly higher baby corn yield as compared to N, and N_{t} during both the seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Half-rate NPK with goat manure and biofertilizers increased baby corn yield significantly relative to N, and N_t.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
goat manures along with bio-fertilizerse0
Interactor
Azospirillum and Phosphobacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
baby corn yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
N, and N_{t}e0

Verbatim

e0

“Combined use of a half NPK with poultry or goat manures along with bio-fertilizers (Azospirillum and Phosphobacteria) has produced significantly higher baby corn yield as compared to N, and N_{t} during both the seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1587 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 34 positive, 28 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

intercropping · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.