Abstract
Soy is a multipurpose oilseed crop. It is highly nutritious and improves soil fertility. Rainfed agriculture needs to improve crop cultivation technologies and focuses on various methods of soil cultivation that contribute to the formation of an optimal agrophysical structure that contributes to a consistently high soybean yield. Therefore, it is expedient and relevant to study the influence of various methods of tillage on the density and hardness of the soil in two phases of soybean development (beginning of soybean vegetation and before harvesting) with the identification of its yield. The following methods of tillage have been studied: flat-cutting, layer-by-layer, mouldboard and without tillage (direct sowing). The highest soil density in both phases of soybean development on the agrobackground without tillage was 1.34 g/cm 3 and 1.27 g/cm 3 . The decrease in soil density was revealed by 13.43-16.53% with flat-cut tillage; by 6.71-16.53% with layer-by-layer tillage; by 5.22-5.51% during moldboard tillage. The highest soil hardness in both phases of soybean development, 1.15 MPa and 2.65 MPa, was established on the agrobackground without tillage. A decrease in soil hardness by 1.53-1.92 times was revealed during flat-cut processing; 1.77-2.77 times with layer-by-layer processing; in 1.64-2.07 at dump. The highest soybean yield was obtained on the agrobackground with flat-cut tillage – 1.90 t/ha. A decrease in yield was established by 15.82% with the layer-by-layer method, by 3.44% with the moldboard method of tillage, by 7.11% on the agrobackground without tillage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Soil density was highest without tillage, at 1.34 and 1.27 g/cm3 across the two phases.
- Taxon
- soybeans
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- without tillagee2
- Outcome
- soil densitye2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 1.34 g/cm 3 and 1.27 g/cm 3e2
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“The highest soil density in both phases of soybean development on the agrobackground without tillage was 1.34 g/cm 3 and 1.27 g/cm 3”
Claim · model-written summary
Flat-cut tillage decreased soil density by 13.43-16.53%.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- flat-cut tillagee2
- Outcome
- soil densitye2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 13.43-16.53%e2
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“The decrease in soil density was revealed by 13.43-16.53% with flat-cut tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Layer-by-layer tillage decreased soil density by 6.71-16.53%.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- layer-by-layer tillagee2
- Outcome
- soil densitye2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 6.71-16.53%e2
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“The decrease in soil density was revealed by 13.43-16.53% with flat-cut tillage; by 6.71-16.53% with layer-by-layer tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Moldboard tillage decreased soil density by 5.22-5.51%.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- moldboard tillagee2
- Outcome
- soil densitye2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 5.22-5.51%e2
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“The decrease in soil density was revealed by 13.43-16.53% with flat-cut tillage; by 6.71-16.53% with layer-by-layer tillage; by 5.22-5.51% during moldboard tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil hardness was highest without tillage, at 1.15 and 2.65 MPa across the two phases.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- without tillagee2
- Outcome
- soil hardnesse2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 1.15 MPa and 2.65 MPae2
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“The highest soil hardness in both phases of soybean development, 1.15 MPa and 2.65 MPa, was established on the agrobackground without tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Flat-cut processing decreased soil hardness 1.53-1.92 times.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- flat-cut processinge2
- Outcome
- soil hardnesse2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 1.53-1.92 timese2
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“A decrease in soil hardness by 1.53-1.92 times was revealed during flat-cut processing”
Claim · model-written summary
Layer-by-layer processing decreased soil hardness 1.77-2.77 times.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- layer-by-layer processinge2
- Outcome
- soil hardnesse2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 1.77-2.77 timese2
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“A decrease in soil hardness by 1.53-1.92 times was revealed during flat-cut processing; 1.77-2.77 times with layer-by-layer processing”
Claim · model-written summary
Dump tillage decreased soil hardness 1.64-2.07 times.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- dumpe2
- Outcome
- soil hardnesse2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 1.64-2.07e2
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“A decrease in soil hardness by 1.53-1.92 times was revealed during flat-cut processing; 1.77-2.77 times with layer-by-layer processing; in 1.64-2.07 at dump”
Claim · model-written summary
Flat-cut tillage gave the highest soybean yield, 1.90 t/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- flat-cut tillagee2
- Outcome
- soybean yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 1.90 t/hae2
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“The highest soybean yield was obtained on the agrobackground with flat-cut tillage – 1.90 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Layer-by-layer tillage decreased soybean yield by 15.82% relative to flat-cut tillage.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- layer-by-layer methode2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 15.82%e2
- Comparator
- flat-cut tillagee3
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“A decrease in yield was established by 15.82% with the layer-by-layer method”
e3“The highest soybean yield was obtained on the agrobackground with flat-cut tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Moldboard tillage decreased soybean yield by 3.44% relative to flat-cut tillage.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- moldboard method of tillagee2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 3.44%e2
- Comparator
- flat-cut tillagee3
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“A decrease in yield was established by 15.82% with the layer-by-layer method, by 3.44% with the moldboard method of tillage”
e3“The highest soybean yield was obtained on the agrobackground with flat-cut tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Without tillage decreased soybean yield by 7.11% relative to flat-cut tillage.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- without tillagee2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- decreasee2
- Value
- 7.11%e2
- Comparator
- flat-cut tillagee3
- Setting
- dry farmingt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peculiarities of tillage in the conditions of dry farming in the cultivation of soybeans”
e2“A decrease in yield was established by 15.82% with the layer-by-layer method, by 3.44% with the moldboard method of tillage, by 7.11% on the agrobackground without tillage”
e3“The highest soybean yield was obtained on the agrobackground with flat-cut tillage”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.