Paper · 2023 · Horticultura Brasileira

No-till cabbage production in different cover crops and phosphorus sources in the Brazilian Cerrado

Guilherme F Alves; José Luiz R Torres; Hamilton Cesar de O Charlo; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT No-till planting and the use of organomineral fertilizers are crop management practices that increase soil organic matter, thereby mitigating leaching and cycling a considerable amount of nutrients, with the potential to improve crop yield. This study aimed to assess the agronomic performance of cabbage grown under a no-till system, using different cover crops and phosphorus sources. A randomized block design was used, with the main plot consisting of eight split plots for different cover crop treatments: 1) Signal grass (SG); 2) Sunn hemp (SH); 3) Pearl millet (PM); 4) SG+SH; 5) SG+PM; 6) SH+PM; 7) SG+SH+PM; 8) conventional tillage (soil preparation with no cover crop), and phosphorus (P) sources in the sub-plots: 1) mineral fertilizer (FM); 2) organomineral fertilizer (OF); 3) no P, with four repetitions. The following characteristics were assessed: cover crop fresh (FW) and dry weight (DW) (t/ha), residue decomposition and nutrient cycling; and cabbage head FW and DW (HFW and HDW) (g/plant) and yield (YLD) (t/ha). The highest FW and DW were recorded in the intercropped cover plant treatments; PM+SH and SG+SH residue exhibited the highest decomposition rate and P cycling into the soil. The highest cabbage HFW and YLD occurred in the SG+SH treatment, regardless of the fertilizer used. The MF used as P source produced a greater cabbage YLD when grown in PM residue. Under conventional tillage, YLD was higher when OF was used as P source.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped cover plant treatments had the highest fresh and dry weight.

Treatment
intercropped cover plant treatmentse0
Outcome
FW and DWe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest FW and DW were recorded in the intercropped cover plant treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PM+SH residue had the highest decomposition rate and P cycling into soil.

Treatment
PM+SHe0
Outcome
decomposition rate and P cycling into the soile0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PM+SH and SG+SH residue exhibited the highest decomposition rate and P cycling into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SG+SH residue had the highest decomposition rate and P cycling into soil.

Treatment
SG+SHe0
Outcome
decomposition rate and P cycling into the soile0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PM+SH and SG+SH residue exhibited the highest decomposition rate and P cycling into the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SG+SH produced the highest cabbage head fresh weight and yield regardless of fertilizer.

Treatment
SG+SH treatmente0
Outcome
HFW and YLDe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
regardless of the fertilizer usede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest cabbage HFW and YLD occurred in the SG+SH treatment, regardless of the fertilizer used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF produced greater cabbage yield in PM residue.

Treatment
MFe0
Outcome
cabbage YLDe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
when grown in PM residuee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MF used as P source produced a greater cabbage YLD when grown in PM residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under conventional tillage, OF produced higher cabbage yield.

Treatment
OFe0
Outcome
YLDe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Under conventional tillagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under conventional tillage, YLD was higher when OF was used as P source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–26 · show in text ↑

Crotalaria juncea · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.