Paper · 1991 · Madras Agricultural Journal

STUDIES ON HIGH VALUE INTERCROPS IN RAINFED SORGHUM

BALASUBRAMANIAM A; MANICKASUNDARAM P; SANKARAN S

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The results of the experiments conducted during North-East monsoon seasons of 1985 1987 revealed that sole sorghum was superior to intercropped sorghum in respect of grain and straw yield. The grain yield recovery of sorghum was high (83.2%) in sorghum+pigeonpea (2:1) system followed by sorghum + greengram in 4:2 ratio. Sunflower as intercrop reduced the grain yield recovery at both the planting pattern. Sorghum (CSH 9) intercropped with sunflower (Co. 1) registered maximum return of Rs.5,156 ha-1 with benefit cost ratio of 2.231.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole sorghum was superior to intercropped sorghum in grain and straw yield.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment
intercropped sorghume1
Outcome
grain and straw yielde1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
sole sorghume1
Setting
North-East monsoon seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RAINFED SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“experiments conducted during North-East monsoon seasons of 1985 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole sorghum was superior to intercropped sorghum in respect of grain and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum in the sorghum+pigeonpea (2:1) system had a high grain yield recovery (83.2%).

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment
sorghum+pigeonpea (2:1) systeme2
Outcome
grain yield recoverye2
Direction
highe2
Value
83.2%e2
Setting
North-East monsoon seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RAINFED SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“experiments conducted during North-East monsoon seasons of 1985 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield recovery of sorghum was high (83.2%) in sorghum+pigeonpea (2:1) system followed by sorghum + greengram in 4:2 ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum in the sorghum + greengram (4:2) system followed the sorghum+pigeonpea system in grain yield recovery.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment
sorghum + greengram in 4:2 ratioe2
Outcome
grain yield recoverye2
Direction
followed bye2
Setting
North-East monsoon seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RAINFED SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“experiments conducted during North-East monsoon seasons of 1985 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield recovery of sorghum was high (83.2%) in sorghum+pigeonpea (2:1) system followed by sorghum + greengram in 4:2 ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower as an intercrop reduced the grain yield recovery of sorghum at both planting patterns.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment
Sunflower as intercrope3
Outcome
grain yield recoverye3
Direction
reducede3
Setting
North-East monsoon seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RAINFED SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“experiments conducted during North-East monsoon seasons of 1985 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sunflower as intercrop reduced the grain yield recovery at both the planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum (CSH 9) intercropped with sunflower (Co. 1) gave the maximum return of Rs.5,156 ha-1.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
CSH 9e4
Treatment
intercropped with sunflower (Co. 1)e4
Outcome
returne4
Direction
maximume4
Value
Rs.5,156 ha-1e4
Setting
North-East monsoon seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RAINFED SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“experiments conducted during North-East monsoon seasons of 1985 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sorghum (CSH 9) intercropped with sunflower (Co. 1) registered maximum return of Rs.5,156 ha-1 with benefit cost ratio of 2.231”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum (CSH 9) intercropped with sunflower (Co. 1) had a benefit cost ratio of 2.231.

Taxon
SORGHUMSorghumt0
Material
CSH 9e4
Treatment
intercropped with sunflower (Co. 1)e4
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe4
Value
2.231e4
Setting
North-East monsoon seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RAINFED SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“experiments conducted during North-East monsoon seasons of 1985 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sorghum (CSH 9) intercropped with sunflower (Co. 1) registered maximum return of Rs.5,156 ha-1 with benefit cost ratio of 2.231”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–535 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cobalt atom · yield · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · yield · SorghumResults differ

165 papers: 118 positive, 47 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.