Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of plant density on the growth of grasses and legumes for ruminants’ production

V I Esan; T O Ogunbode; O C Olaniyi; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Grasses and legumes are the two most significant plant species utilized as animal feed. Each of them has a special set of advantages that make it suitable for a distinct use. Thus, the objectives of this research work were to (i) evaluate the effects of planting density on growth and development of legumes and grasses, and (ii) examine the effects of planting density on the nutritional status of legumes and grasses for ruminant production. Five legumes and two grasses were subjected to 10 cm, 20 cm and 30 cm planting density in RCBD with three replications. ANOVA indicated that there were highly significant differences (P<0.001) in all the parameters measured. The plant density was also found to have highly significant (P<0.001) effect on internode and significant (P<0.05) effect on stem diameter and number of stems. Species by plant density interaction had highly significant effect (P<0.001) only on internode length. There was significant (P<0.05) decrease in morphological traits and biomass yields as the plant density increased. There were significant differences in mineral elements and proximate composition. Increase in plant density decreased the performance of plant species. The planting of both legumes and grasses at 30 cm spacing will be more beneficial for ruminant feed production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured forage parameters differed significantly across study groups.

Taxon
grasses and legumest0
Outcome
all the parameters measurede0
Value
P<0.001e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“ANOVA indicated that there were highly significant differences (P<0.001) in all the parameters measured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“grasses and legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected internode length.

Taxon
grasses and legumest0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
internodee0
Value
P<0.001e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The plant density was also found to have highly significant (P<0.001) effect on internode and significant (P<0.05) effect on stem diameter and number of stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“grasses and legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected stem diameter and number of stems.

Taxon
grasses and legumest0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
stem diameter and number of stemse0
Value
P<0.05e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The plant density was also found to have highly significant (P<0.001) effect on internode and significant (P<0.05) effect on stem diameter and number of stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“grasses and legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Species and density interacted significantly for internode length.

Taxon
grasses and legumest0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
internode lengthe0
Value
P<0.001e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Species by plant density interaction had highly significant effect (P<0.001) only on internode length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“grasses and legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphological traits decreased significantly with increasing planting density.

Taxon
grasses and legumest0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
morphological traitse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
P<0.05e0

Verbatim

e0

“There was significant (P<0.05) decrease in morphological traits and biomass yields as the plant density increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“grasses and legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass yields decreased significantly with increasing planting density.

Taxon
grasses and legumest0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
biomass yieldse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
P<0.05e0

Verbatim

e0

“There was significant (P<0.05) decrease in morphological traits and biomass yields as the plant density increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“grasses and legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage mineral elements and proximate composition differed significantly.

Taxon
grasses and legumest0
Outcome
mineral elements and proximate compositione0
Direction
differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant differences in mineral elements and proximate composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“grasses and legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 30 cm spacing for both legumes and grasses in ruminant feed production.

Taxon
legumes and grassese0
Outcome
planting of both legumes and grasses at 30 cm spacinge0

Verbatim

e0

“The planting of both legumes and grasses at 30 cm spacing will be more beneficial for ruminant feed production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1319 · show in text ↑