Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Growth and nutritional potential of selected grasses and legumes for ruminants’ production

V I Esan; O C Olaniyi; T O Ogunbode; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The production of legumes and grasses are a sustainable strategy to feed ruminants. These species are rich in nutrients which can improve animal health with less treatment. Therefore, the objective of this work was to assess the performance of the middle and edge plants of five legumes and two grasses for morphological traits, fresh and dry matter yields and nutritional potential as feed for ruminants. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis using R software. The results indicated that very highly significant differences (P<0.001) were observed among the nutritional values, morphological and biomass yield traits except for stem diameter. There was also significant difference(P<0.001) between the edge plants and middle plants. The mean values of the number of leaves and number of stem were higher in the edge plants than in the middle plants for all the seven species. Carbohydrate was the most abundant (42.40), followed by protein (17.81), crude fiber (15.79) and crude fat (7.32). The element analyses of leaf showed N, K, Ca and Mg are suitable for ruminant production in all species. A strong positive correlation was observed among the protein, crude fat and crude fiber compounds. Edge effects were observed showing the highest values when compared to the middle plants. Centrosema pubescens out performed in terms of overall protein, crude fat and crude fiber, while Mucuna pruriens recorded the highest mean value of dry biomass yield. The production of both grasses and legumes, because of their diverse proximate and mineral compositions, constitutes one of the mainstay for sustainable and competitive animal production systems. We recommend ruminant farmers to plant the grasses and legumes at the edges of their farms for sustainable fodder production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The seven forage species differed in nutritional, morphological, and biomass yield traits, excluding stem diameter.

Taxon
legumes and two grassese1
Outcome
nutritional values, morphological and biomass yield traitse0
Qualifier
except for stem diametere0

Verbatim

e0

“very highly significant differences (P<0.001) were observed among the nutritional values, morphological and biomass yield traits except for stem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–671 · show in text ↑
e1

“five legumes and two grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–311 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Edge and middle plants differed significantly.

Taxon
legumes and two grassese1
Outcome
differencee0
Setting
edge plants and middle plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“significant difference(P<0.001) between the edge plants and middle plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–761 · show in text ↑
e1

“five legumes and two grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–311 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Edge plants had more leaves and stems than middle plants across all seven species.

Taxon
legumes and two grassese1
Outcome
number of leaves and number of steme0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
middle plantse0
Setting
edge plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves and number of stem were higher in the edge plants than in the middle plants for all the seven species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“five legumes and two grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbohydrate was the most abundant measured feed component.

Taxon
legumes and two grassese1
Outcome
Carbohydratee0
Direction
most abundante0
Value
42.40e0

Verbatim

e0

“Carbohydrate was the most abundant (42.40)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“five legumes and two grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein was the next most abundant measured feed component.

Taxon
legumes and two grassese1
Outcome
proteine0
Value
17.81e0

Verbatim

e0

“Carbohydrate was the most abundant (42.40), followed by protein (17.81)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“five legumes and two grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude fiber followed protein in measured abundance.

Taxon
legumes and two grassese1
Outcome
crude fibere0
Value
15.79e0

Verbatim

e0

“protein (17.81), crude fiber (15.79)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–998 · show in text ↑
e1

“five legumes and two grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude fat had a reported value of 7.32.

Taxon
legumes and two grassese1
Outcome
crude fate0
Value
7.32e0

Verbatim

e0

“crude fat (7.32)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“five legumes and two grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf N, K, Ca, and Mg were judged suitable for ruminant production across species.

Taxon
legumes and two grassese1
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
N, K, Ca and Mg are suitable for ruminant productione0

Verbatim

e0

“element analyses of leaf showed N, K, Ca and Mg are suitable for ruminant production in all species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1124 · show in text ↑
e1

“five legumes and two grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–311 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein, crude fat, and crude fiber were strongly positively correlated.

Taxon
legumes and two grassese1
Compound
proteine0
Outcome
protein, crude fat and crude fiber compoundse0
Direction
positivee0

Verbatim

e0

“A strong positive correlation was observed among the protein, crude fat and crude fiber compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“five legumes and two grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Centrosema pubescens had the best overall protein, crude fat, and crude fiber.

Taxon
Centrosema pubescensCentrosema pubescense0
Outcome
overall protein, crude fat and crude fibere0
Direction
out performede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Centrosema pubescens
Centrosema pubescens · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Centrosema pubescens out performed in terms of overall protein, crude fat and crude fiber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mucuna pruriens had the highest mean dry biomass yield.

Taxon
Mucuna pruriensMucuna pruriense0
Outcome
dry biomass yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mucuna pruriens
Mucuna pruriens · TaxonDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mucuna pruriens recorded the highest mean value of dry biomass yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1480 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend planting grasses and legumes on farm edges for sustainable fodder.

Taxon
grasses and legumese0
Outcome
plant the grasses and legumes at the edges of their farms for sustainable fodder productione0

Verbatim

e0

“We recommend ruminant farmers to plant the grasses and legumes at the edges of their farms for sustainable fodder production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1802 · show in text ↑