Paper · 2023 · Agricultural science Euro-North-East

Efficiency of technologies for the use of mineral fertilizers when cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region

A. A. Artemjev; A. M. Guryanov

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the conditions of the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region (Republic of Mordovia) there was carried out the research on studying the effect of various technologies for the use of mineral fertilizers, with and without taking into account the intra-soil variability of soil fertility indicators in crops of spring barley of the Zazersky 85 variety. The experiment was carried out in 2012 and 2018 in two fields of grain-row crop rotation on leached chernozem (humus in the 0-25 сm layer – 5.3-6.9 %, nitrate and ammonium nitrogen 6.1-16.8 mg/kg of soil, mobile phosphorus 83-182 mg/kg of soil and exchangeable potassium 90-196 mg/kg of soil). The scheme of the experiment: control (without fertilizers); average dose of fertilizers (N 70 P 34 K 26 – in 2012, N 72 P 36 K 25 – in 2018); differentiated dose (N 53-80 P 24-43 K 17-34 in 2012 and N 56-80 P 25-42 K 20-27 in 2018). Fertilizer doses are calculated for the planned barley yield of 3.0 t/ha. The experiment was based on the principle of a split plot, where plots of the 1st order were reserved for variants with fertilizers, and plots of the 2nd order (5 plots in each repetition) were used to determine the variability of intra-soil fertility and fertilizer application. On average, for two fields of crop rotation, the highest barley yield (3.14 t/ha) was obtained in the variant with differentiated use of fertilizers, which was significantly 72 % higher than the control and 13 % higher than the variant with average doses. The application of fertilizers taking into account the heterogeneity of nutrients in the soil provided the smallest range of variation in yield (0.8 t/ha) across the plots of the polygon with an insignificant level of variation coefficient (V = 9.8 %). The use of fertilizers in the cultivation of barley had a statistically significant effect on the increase in the weight of 1000 grains, plant height, productive tillering coefficient and ear length. Differentiated doses of fertilizers compared with the averaged doses led to a noticeable increase in the values of productive bushiness of plants (by 8.3 %) and spike length (by 3.9 %). The technology of applying mineral fertilizers, taking into account the intra-soil variability of soil fertility indicators, was distinguished by the highest level of profitability in the production of spring barley grain (47.6 %) compared to traditional (26.2 %) and fertilizer savings (by 7.5-8.5 %).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentiated fertilizer use gave the highest barley yield, 72 % higher than the control.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
differentiated use of fertilizerse1
Outcome
barley yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
72 %e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest barley yield (3.14 t/ha) was obtained in the variant with differentiated use of fertilizers, which was significantly 72 % higher than the control and 13 % higher than the variant with average doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentiated fertilizer use gave barley yield 13 % higher than the average-dose variant.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
differentiated use of fertilizerse1
Outcome
barley yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
13 %e1
Comparator
average dosese1
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest barley yield (3.14 t/ha) was obtained in the variant with differentiated use of fertilizers, which was significantly 72 % higher than the control and 13 % higher than the variant with average doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application accounting for nutrient heterogeneity gave the smallest range of yield variation across plots, 0.8 t/ha.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
application of fertilizers taking into account the heterogeneity of nutrients in the soile2
Outcome
range of variation in yielde2
Direction
smalleste2
Value
0.8 t/hae2
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of fertilizers taking into account the heterogeneity of nutrients in the soil provided the smallest range of variation in yield (0.8 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1646 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The coefficient of variation of yield was 9.8 %, an insignificant level.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
variation coefficiente3
Value
9.8 %e3
Qualifier
insignificant levele3
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e3

“with an insignificant level of variation coefficient (V = 9.8 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer use significantly increased the weight of 1000 grains, plant height and productive tillering coefficient of barley.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
use of fertilizerse4
Outcome
weight of 1000 grains, plant height, productive tillering coefficiente4
Direction
increasee4
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of fertilizers in the cultivation of barley had a statistically significant effect on the increase in the weight of 1000 grains, plant height, productive tillering coefficient and ear length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer use significantly increased barley ear length.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
use of fertilizerse4
Outcome
ear lengthe4
Direction
increasee4
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of fertilizers in the cultivation of barley had a statistically significant effect on the increase in the weight of 1000 grains, plant height, productive tillering coefficient and ear length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentiated fertilizer doses increased productive bushiness of plants by 8.3 % compared with averaged doses.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Differentiated doses of fertilizerse5
Outcome
productive bushiness of plantse5
Direction
increasee5
Value
8.3 %e5
Comparator
averaged dosese5
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e5

“Differentiated doses of fertilizers compared with the averaged doses led to a noticeable increase in the values of productive bushiness of plants (by 8.3 %) and spike length (by 3.9 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentiated fertilizer doses increased spike length by 3.9 % compared with averaged doses.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Differentiated doses of fertilizerse5
Outcome
spike lengthe5
Direction
increasee5
Value
3.9 %e5
Comparator
averaged dosese5
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e5

“Differentiated doses of fertilizers compared with the averaged doses led to a noticeable increase in the values of productive bushiness of plants (by 8.3 %) and spike length (by 3.9 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mineral fertilizer technology that accounts for intra-soil variability gave the highest spring barley grain profitability, 47.6 %, against traditional technology (26.2 %).

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
technology of applying mineral fertilizers, taking into account the intra-soil variability of soil fertility indicatorse6
Outcome
profitabilitye6
Direction
higheste6
Value
47.6 %e6
Qualifier
26.2 %e6
Comparator
traditionale6
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e6

“The technology of applying mineral fertilizers, taking into account the intra-soil variability of soil fertility indicators, was distinguished by the highest level of profitability in the production of spring barley grain (47.6 %) compared to traditional (26.2 %) and fertilizer savings (by 7.5-8.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mineral fertilizer technology that accounts for intra-soil variability gave the highest spring barley grain profitability, 7.5-8.5 % above fertilizer savings.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
technology of applying mineral fertilizers, taking into account the intra-soil variability of soil fertility indicatorse6
Outcome
profitabilitye6
Direction
higheste6
Value
7.5-8.5 %e6
Comparator
fertilizer savingse6
Setting
forest-steppe of the Middle Volga regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivating spring barley in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–140 · show in text ↑
e6

“The technology of applying mineral fertilizers, taking into account the intra-soil variability of soil fertility indicators, was distinguished by the highest level of profitability in the production of spring barley grain (47.6 %) compared to traditional (26.2 %) and fertilizer savings (by 7.5-8.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2432 · show in text ↑

soil · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.