Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Influence of INM on Growth and Yield of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) NEPZ

Mo Naushad; Lalit Kumar Sanodiya; Mohd Rehan; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

At the United University's Agricultural Research Farm in Rawatpur, Jhalwa, Prayagraj (U.P.), India, during the Kharif season of 2022, a research on green gram (Vigna radiata L.) was carried out to examine the effects of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, and economics. On green gram (Vigna radiata L), the experiment was conducted using a randomized bock design with three replications in all allowable combinations of inorganic fertilizers, Rhizobium, and PSB together with FYM. This study showed that plant height (91.99 cm), dry weight (105.45 g), and number of root nodules (111.33) were all significantly enhanced by 100% RDF + 5.0 tonnes FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium and PSB seed inoculation. In terms of increasing yield and yield-related indicators, such as number of pods plant-1 (31.43), number of seeds pod-1 (12.46), test weight (37.26 g), and harvest index (34.90%), the same treatment combination likewise showed the best results. As a result, adding farm yard manure at a rate of 5 tonnes per hectare coupled with Rhizobium and PSB increased yield compared to the control. But using 100% RDF, bio fertilizer, and FYM @ 5.0 tonnes ha-1 greatly boosts gross returns (₹ 104,120.00), net returns (₹ 76,017.00), and benefit: cost ratio (2.70). These results showed that the addition of organic matter, inorganic fertilizers, and bio-fertilizers all combined to boost yield while using various nutrition sources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly enhanced plant height to 91.99 cm.

Treatment
100% RDF + 5.0 tonnes FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium and PSB seed inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
91.99 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (91.99 cm), dry weight (105.45 g), and number of root nodules (111.33) were all significantly enhanced by 100% RDF + 5.0 tonnes FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium and PSB seed inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly enhanced dry weight to 105.45 g.

Treatment
100% RDF + 5.0 tonnes FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium and PSB seed inoculatione0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
105.45 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weight (105.45 g), and number of root nodules (111.33) were all significantly enhanced by 100% RDF + 5.0 tonnes FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium and PSB seed inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly enhanced root nodule number to 111.33.

Treatment
100% RDF + 5.0 tonnes FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium and PSB seed inoculatione0
Outcome
number of root nodulese0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
111.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of root nodules (111.33) were all significantly enhanced by 100% RDF + 5.0 tonnes FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium and PSB seed inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced the best pods per plant, at 31.43.

Treatment
same treatment combinatione0
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
beste0
Value
31.43e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods plant-1 (31.43), number of seeds pod-1 (12.46), test weight (37.26 g), and harvest index (34.90%), the same treatment combination likewise showed the best results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced the best seeds per pod, at 12.46.

Outcome
number of seeds pod-1e0
Direction
beste0
Value
12.46e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of seeds pod-1 (12.46), test weight (37.26 g), and harvest index (34.90%), the same treatment combination likewise showed the best results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced the best test weight, at 37.26 g.

Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
beste0
Value
37.26 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“test weight (37.26 g), and harvest index (34.90%), the same treatment combination likewise showed the best results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced the best harvest index, at 34.90%.

Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
beste0
Value
34.90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index (34.90%), the same treatment combination likewise showed the best results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure with Rhizobium and PSB increased yield versus control.

Treatment
farm yard manure at a rate of 5 tonnes per hectare coupled with Rhizobium and PSBe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adding farm yard manure at a rate of 5 tonnes per hectare coupled with Rhizobium and PSB increased yield compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment boosted gross returns to ₹ 104,120.00.

Treatment
100% RDF, bio fertilizer, and FYM @ 5.0 tonnes ha-1e0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
boostse0
Value
₹ 104,120.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using 100% RDF, bio fertilizer, and FYM @ 5.0 tonnes ha-1 greatly boosts gross returns (₹ 104,120.00), net returns (₹ 76,017.00), and benefit: cost ratio (2.70).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment boosted net returns to ₹ 76,017.00.

Treatment
100% RDF, bio fertilizer, and FYM @ 5.0 tonnes ha-1e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
boostse0
Value
₹ 76,017.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using 100% RDF, bio fertilizer, and FYM @ 5.0 tonnes ha-1 greatly boosts gross returns (₹ 104,120.00), net returns (₹ 76,017.00), and benefit: cost ratio (2.70).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment boosted benefit-cost ratio to 2.70.

Treatment
100% RDF, bio fertilizer, and FYM @ 5.0 tonnes ha-1e0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
boostse0
Value
2.70e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using 100% RDF, bio fertilizer, and FYM @ 5.0 tonnes ha-1 greatly boosts gross returns (₹ 104,120.00), net returns (₹ 76,017.00), and benefit: cost ratio (2.70).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 51 positive, 2 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

81 papers: 79 positive, 2 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.