Paper · 2006 · Letters in Applied Microbiology

Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase on maize (Zea mays L.) growth under axenic conditions and on nodulation in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)

B. Shaharoona; M. Arshad; Z.A. Zahir

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
350
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

AIMS: This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the bacterial strains possessing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-deaminase activity may also promote growth of inoculated plants and could increase nodulation in legumes upon co-inoculation with rhizobia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Several rhizobacteria were isolated from maize rhizosphere through enrichment on ACC as a sole N source. Purified isolates were screened for growth promotion in maize under axenic conditions and for in vitro ACC-deaminase activity. A significant positive correlation was observed between in vitro ACC-deaminase activity of bacterial cells and root elongation. None of the isolates produced auxins. Bradyrhizobium japonicum produced less amount of auxins but did not carry ACC-deaminase activity. Results of pot experiment revealed that co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolates enhanced the nodulation in mung bean compared with inoculation with Bradyrhizobium alone. CONCLUSIONS: It is highly expected that inoculation with rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase hydrolysed endogenous ACC into ammonia and alpha-ketobutyrate instead of ethylene. Consequently, root and shoot growth as well as nodulation were promoted. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The ACC-deaminase trait could be employed as an efficient tool to screen effective PGPR, which could be successfully used as biofertilizers to increase the growth of inoculated plants as well as nodulation in legumes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro ACC-deaminase activity of rhizobacterial cells was positively correlated with maize root elongation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Gene
ACC-deaminasee1
Outcome
root elongatione1
Direction
positive correlatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“A significant positive correlation was observed between in vitro ACC-deaminase activity of bacterial cells and root elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the rhizobacterial isolates from maize rhizosphere produced auxins.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese3symbiont
Outcome
produced auxinse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“None of the isolates produced auxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–693 · show in text ↑
e3

“Several rhizobacteria were isolated from maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–355 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium japonicum produced less auxin than the rhizobacterial isolates and had no ACC-deaminase activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicumBradyrhizobium japonicume4symbiont
Outcome
auxinse4
Qualifier
did not carry ACC-deaminase activitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Bradyrhizobium japonicum produced less amount of auxins but did not carry ACC-deaminase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium with PGPR isolates enhanced mung bean nodulation compared with Bradyrhizobium alone.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat1
Treatment
co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolatese5
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume5symbiont
Second interactor
plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)e5symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione5
Direction
enhancede5
Comparator
inoculation with Bradyrhizobium alonee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“nodulation in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–156 · show in text ↑
e5

“co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolates enhanced the nodulation in mung bean compared with inoculation with Bradyrhizobium alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1013 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

ACC-deaminase rhizobacteria are expected to promote root and shoot growth and nodulation by lowering ethylene.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Gene
ACC-deaminasee7
Outcome
root and shoot growth as well as nodulatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“Consequently, root and shoot growth as well as nodulation were promoted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1265 · show in text ↑
e7

“It is highly expected that inoculation with rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase hydrolysed endogenous ACC into ammonia and alpha-ketobutyrate instead of ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1192 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The ACC-deaminase trait could be used as an efficient tool to screen effective PGPR.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
efficient tool to screen effective PGPRe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“The ACC-deaminase trait could be employed as an efficient tool to screen effective PGPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1392 · show in text ↑

Bradyrhizobium · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

81 papers: 79 positive, 2 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.