Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Exploring the mechanisms of endophytic bacteria for suppressing early blight disease in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Nashwa M. A. Sallam; Heba-Alla S. AbdElfatah; Hadeel M. M. Khalil Bagy; et al.

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Controlling early blight of tomatoes using endophytic bacteria is an eco-friendly and sustainable approach to manage this common fungal disease caused by Alternaria solani, Alternaria alternata , and Curvularia lunata . Endophytic bacteria are microorganisms that live inside plant tissues without causing harm and can help protect the host plant from pathogens. In this work, twenty endophytic bacterial isolates from tomato healthy plants were tested against pathogenic fungal isolates that caused early blight disease in vitro . Out of the 20 tested isolates, three (B4, B7, and B17) were considered effective isolates against the growth of fungal pathogens. The three isolates were recognized as Enterobacter cloacae HS-6 (B4), Pseudomonas gessardii HS-5 (B 7), and Pseudomonas mediterranea HS-4 (B17) using 16s-rDNA sequencing. Different concentrations of bacterial cultural diltrates at 20, 40, and 60% were tested for their antagonistic effects on the development of pathogenic fungi in vitro . The lowest dry weights of pathogenic isolates in all bacterial culture filtrates were discovered at 60%. In all culture filtrates, phenolic compounds showed the largest peak area. Under greenhouse conditions, the least disease severity of tomato early blight was found for E. cloacae and its culture filtrate compared to other treatments. Real-time PCR was used to examine the expression pattern of the defense response gene β-1.3 glucanase gene in infected tomato plants with pathogenic fungi (control) as well as its relations with efficient biocontrol agent ( E. cloacae ). The expression of the gene increased substantially and significantly after three days from the inoculation-infected plants with C. lunata and E. cloacae while it reached the maximum after five days from the inoculation with A. alternata , A. solani and E. cloacae . Our study concluded that the endophytic bacterial isolate E. cloacae can be considered a promising biocontrol agent for preventing tomato early blight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three of the 20 endophytic bacterial isolates were effective against the growth of fungal pathogens in vitro.

Treatment
endophytic bacterial isolatese2
Interactor
fungal pathogense1pathogen
Second interactor
endophytic bacterial isolatese2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of fungal pathogense1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Out of the 20 tested isolates, three (B4, B7, and B17) were considered effective isolates against the growth of fungal pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–660 · show in text ↑
e2

“twenty endophytic bacterial isolates from tomato healthy plants were tested against pathogenic fungal isolates that caused early blight disease in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowest pathogen dry weights were obtained with bacterial culture filtrates at 60%.

Treatment
bacterial culture filtratese1
Interactor
pathogenic isolatese1pathogen
Outcome
dry weights of pathogenic isolatese1
Direction
loweste1
Value
60%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest dry weights of pathogenic isolates in all bacterial culture filtrates were discovered at 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic compounds showed the largest peak area in all culture filtrates.

Outcome
peak areae1
Qualifier
phenolic compounds showed the largeste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“In all culture filtrates, phenolic compounds showed the largest peak area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. cloacae and its culture filtrate gave the least tomato early blight disease severity under greenhouse conditions.

Treatment
E. cloacae and its culture filtratee1
Interactor
E. cloacaeEnterobacter cloacaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severity of tomato early blighte1
Direction
leaste1
Comparator
other treatmentse1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter cloacae
Enterobacter cloacae · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under greenhouse conditions, the least disease severity of tomato early blight was found for E. cloacae and its culture filtrate compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defence gene β-1.3 glucanase expression increased significantly after three days in tomato plants inoculated with C. lunata and E. cloacae.

Treatment
inoculatione1
Interactor
C. lunataCurvularia lunatae1pathogen
Second interactor
E. cloacaeEnterobacter cloacaee1biocontrol_agent
Gene
β-1.3 glucanase genee2
Outcome
expression of the genee1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
after three dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Curvularia lunata
Curvularia lunata · InteractorMedmyco at English Wikipedia · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter cloacae
Enterobacter cloacae · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The expression of the gene increased substantially and significantly after three days from the inoculation-infected plants with C. lunata and E. cloacae while it reached the maximum after five days from the inoculation with A. alternata , A. solani and E. cloacae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1842 · show in text ↑
e2

“defense response gene β-1.3 glucanase gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defence gene β-1.3 glucanase expression reached its maximum after five days in tomato plants inoculated with A. alternata and E. cloacae.

Treatment
inoculatione1
Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae1pathogen
Second interactor
E. cloacaeEnterobacter cloacaee1biocontrol_agent
Gene
β-1.3 glucanase genee2
Outcome
expression of the genee1
Direction
maximume1
Qualifier
after five dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter cloacae
Enterobacter cloacae · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The expression of the gene increased substantially and significantly after three days from the inoculation-infected plants with C. lunata and E. cloacae while it reached the maximum after five days from the inoculation with A. alternata , A. solani and E. cloacae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1842 · show in text ↑
e2

“defense response gene β-1.3 glucanase gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defence gene β-1.3 glucanase expression reached its maximum after five days in tomato plants inoculated with A. solani and E. cloacae.

Treatment
inoculatione1
Interactor
A. solaniAlternaria solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
E. cloacaeEnterobacter cloacaee1biocontrol_agent
Gene
β-1.3 glucanase genee2
Outcome
expression of the genee1
Direction
maximume1
Qualifier
after five dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter cloacae
Enterobacter cloacae · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The expression of the gene increased substantially and significantly after three days from the inoculation-infected plants with C. lunata and E. cloacae while it reached the maximum after five days from the inoculation with A. alternata , A. solani and E. cloacae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1842 · show in text ↑
e2

“defense response gene β-1.3 glucanase gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1447 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

E. cloacae is recommended as a promising biocontrol agent for preventing tomato early blight.

Interactor
E. cloacaeEnterobacter cloacaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
a promising biocontrol agent for preventing tomato early blighte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter cloacae
Enterobacter cloacae · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our study concluded that the endophytic bacterial isolate E. cloacae can be considered a promising biocontrol agent for preventing tomato early blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1845–1995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter cloacae HS-6 was recognised as one of three effective isolates by 16S rDNA sequencing.

Material
Enterobacter cloacae HS-6e1
Outcome
recognized ase1
Qualifier
using 16s-rDNA sequencinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three isolates were recognized as Enterobacter cloacae HS-6 (B4), Pseudomonas gessardii HS-5 (B 7), and Pseudomonas mediterranea HS-4 (B17) using 16s-rDNA sequencing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–831 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas gessardii HS-5 was recognised as one of three effective isolates by 16S rDNA sequencing.

Material
Pseudomonas gessardii HS-5e1
Outcome
recognized ase1
Qualifier
using 16s-rDNA sequencinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three isolates were recognized as Enterobacter cloacae HS-6 (B4), Pseudomonas gessardii HS-5 (B 7), and Pseudomonas mediterranea HS-4 (B17) using 16s-rDNA sequencing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–831 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas mediterranea HS-4 was recognised as one of three effective isolates by 16S rDNA sequencing.

Material
Pseudomonas mediterranea HS-4e1
Outcome
recognized ase1
Qualifier
using 16s-rDNA sequencinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three isolates were recognized as Enterobacter cloacae HS-6 (B4), Pseudomonas gessardii HS-5 (B 7), and Pseudomonas mediterranea HS-4 (B17) using 16s-rDNA sequencing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–831 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Alternaria alternata · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · Alternaria solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pathogen product · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.