Paper · 2023 · Food Research

Application interval and concentration effect of gamma degraded chitosan onmulberry plant

M. Mahmud; N. Talip; N. Yacob; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Gamma radiation is one of the established tools to induce chain-scission of chitosan for low molecular weight chitosan preparation. The introduction of various radiation doses to chitosan powder produces degraded chitosan with various molecular ranges. They indicate different physicochemical and biological properties which are very important in product development. This study aimed to produce low molecular weight chitosan with an average molecular weight below 20 000 Da by exposing chitosan powder to gamma radiation at doses of 25, 50, 75 and 100 kGy. Then, to observe its growth-promoting activity on mulberry plants. The gamma-degraded chitosan was characterized by size exclusion chromatography-multi-angles laser light scattering (SEC-MALLS) and Fourier-Transform infrared (FTIR) to determine its weight-average molecular weight and molecular composition changes, respectively. After that, the gamma-degraded chitosan powder was dissolved in an acidic solution before spraying into mulberry. In the field, the mulberry plants were treated with 40, 80 and 100 ppm of degraded chitosan by foliar application. Each treatment consisted of 5 replicates of 2- 3 months-old mulberry plants which were randomly picked from the nursery. The control plants were treated with commercial growth promoter at concentration of 100 ppm which was applied weekly according to the farmer's practice. The study was carried out for 4.5 months at 2 different application intervals which were every two- and four-weeks’ time. The mulberry plants treated with 80 ppm and 100 ppm degraded chitosan every two- and four-weeks showed better results on an average number of leaves and fruit, respectively compared to control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At two-week intervals, 80 ppm degraded chitosan gave a better average number of mulberry leaves than the control.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
80 ppme0
Outcome
average number of leavese0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
every two-e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The mulberry plants treated with 80 ppm and 100 ppm degraded chitosan every two- and four-weeks showed better results on an average number of leaves and fruit, respectively compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1706 · show in text ↑
e1

“The control plants were treated with commercial growth promoter at concentration of 100 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At four-week intervals, 100 ppm degraded chitosan gave a better average number of mulberry fruits than the control.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
100 ppm degraded chitosane0
Outcome
fruite0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
four-weekse0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The mulberry plants treated with 80 ppm and 100 ppm degraded chitosan every two- and four-weeks showed better results on an average number of leaves and fruit, respectively compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1706 · show in text ↑

chitosan · yield · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.