Paper · 2023 · Journal of Helminthology

Host response of Nicotiana benthamiana to the parasitism of five populations of root-lesion nematode, Pratylenchus coffeae, from China

M. Sun; W. Niu; L. Shi; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In a recent survey of nematodes associated with tobacco in Shandong, China, the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus coffeae was identified using a combination of morphology and molecular techniques. This nematode species is a serious parasite that damages a variety of plant species. The model plant benthi, Nicotiana benthamiana , is frequently used to study plant-disease interactions. However, it is not known whether this plant species is a host of P. coffeae. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the parasitism and pathogenicity of five populations of the root-lesion nematode P. coffeae on N. benthamiana. N. benthamiana seedlings with the same growth status were chosen and inoculated with 1,000 nematodes per pot. At 60 days after inoculation, the reproductive factors (Rf = final population densities (Pf)/initial population densities (Pi)) for P. coffeae in the rhizosphere of N. benthamiana were all more than 1, suggesting that N. benthamiana was a good host plant for P. coffeae. Nicotiana. benthamiana infected by P. coffeae showed weak growth, decreased tillering, high root reduction, and noticeable brown spots on the roots. Thus, we determined that the model plant N. benthamiana can be used to study plant- P. coffeae interactions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All five nematode populations had reproductive factors above one in the N. benthamiana rhizosphere.

Taxon
N. benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Organ / stage
rhizospheree0
Interactor
P. coffeaePratylenchus coffeaee0pathogen
Outcome
reproductive factorse0
Value
more than 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus coffeae
Pratylenchus coffeae · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reproductive factors (Rf = final population densities (Pf)/initial population densities (Pi)) for P. coffeae in the rhizosphere of N. benthamiana were all more than 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–939 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. benthamiana was a good host for P. coffeae.

Taxon
N. benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Interactor
P. coffeaePratylenchus coffeaee0pathogen
Outcome
good host plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus coffeae
Pratylenchus coffeae · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. benthamiana was a good host plant for P. coffeae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection by P. coffeae weakened growth and reduced tillering and roots in N. benthamiana.

Taxon
benthamianae0
Treatment
infected by P. coffeaee0
Interactor
P. coffeaePratylenchus coffeaee0pathogen
Outcome
weak growth, decreased tillering, high root reductione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pratylenchus coffeae
Pratylenchus coffeae · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana. benthamiana infected by P. coffeae showed weak growth, decreased tillering, high root reduction, and noticeable brown spots on the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. coffeae infection produced brown spots on N. benthamiana roots.

Taxon
benthamianae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
infected by P. coffeaee0
Interactor
P. coffeaePratylenchus coffeaee0pathogen
Outcome
noticeable brown spots on the rootse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pratylenchus coffeae
Pratylenchus coffeae · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nicotiana. benthamiana infected by P. coffeae showed weak growth, decreased tillering, high root reduction, and noticeable brown spots on the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1158 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that N. benthamiana can serve as a model for P. coffeae interactions.

Taxon
N. benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Interactor
P. coffeaePratylenchus coffeaee0pathogen
Outcome
can be used to study plant- P. coffeae interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus coffeae
Pratylenchus coffeae · InteractorUSDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the model plant N. benthamiana can be used to study plant- P. coffeae interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1266 · show in text ↑

infection · growth · Nicotiana benthamianaPositive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.