Paper · 1976 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Cultural and Chemical Methods of Weed Control in Transplanted Rice

RANGIAH P.K; MOHAMAD ALI A; KOLANDAISAMY S

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There was no significant different between the preplant application of paraquat at 0.8 kg a.i./ha and puddling six times. Hand weeding and working rotary weeder recorded the maximum yield when compared to the herbicides rogue, butachlor propanil and 2,4-D, which were in turn better than unweeded check. The combination of post emergence application of propanil and paraquat was also not effective. But propanil combined with thorough land preparation and paraquat combined with hand weeding recorded the same yield as good land preparation and cultural methods of weed control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant paraquat and six puddling passes did not differ significantly.

Treatment
preplant application of paraquat at 0.8 kg a.i./hae0
Outcome
no significant differente0
Direction
no significant differente0
Comparator
puddling six timese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant different between the preplant application of paraquat at 0.8 kg a.i./ha and puddling six times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding and rotary weeding gave maximum yield compared with herbicides.

Treatment
Hand weeding and working rotary weedere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
herbicides rogue, butachlor propanil and 2,4-De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding and working rotary weeder recorded the maximum yield when compared to the herbicides rogue, butachlor propanil and 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides gave better yield than the unweeded check.

Treatment
herbicides rogue, butachlor propanil and 2,4-De0
Outcome
better than unweeded checke0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicides rogue, butachlor propanil and 2,4-D, which were in turn better than unweeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence propanil plus paraquat was ineffective.

Treatment
post emergence application of propanil and paraquate0
Outcome
not effectivee0
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of post emergence application of propanil and paraquat was also not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propanil with thorough land preparation matched yield from good land preparation and cultural weed control.

Treatment
propanil combined with thorough land preparatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
good land preparation and cultural methods of weed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“propanil combined with thorough land preparation and paraquat combined with hand weeding recorded the same yield as good land preparation and cultural methods of weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat with hand weeding matched yield from good land preparation and cultural weed control.

Treatment
paraquat combined with hand weedinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
good land preparation and cultural methods of weed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“paraquat combined with hand weeding recorded the same yield as good land preparation and cultural methods of weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66 · show in text ↑

paraquat · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

propanil · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

40 papers: 29 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.