Paper · 2023 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Impact of Phosphine Fumigation Treatments on the Vitality of Wheat Grains at Different Storage Periods

Youssef Abdul Hamid; Elmahdy Teama; Mohamed Said; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To study the effect of phosphine fumigation treatments (two tablet/ton exposure for 24, 48, 72 hours; four tablet/ton exposure for 24, 48,72 hours; six tablet/ton exposure for 24, 48, 72 hours ) on the vitality of bread wheat grains cv. Giza 171 at different storage periods (fresh grains, 3, 6, and 9 months) using a complete randomized design with three replications at the laboratory of Prof. Dr. Youssef Mohamed Omar, Plant Protection Department, Agriculture Faculty, Assiut University during the period from 26 May 2022 to 3 March 2023. Grains of Giza 171 cv. were obtained from the Agronomy Department Farm, Agriculture Faculty, Assiut University. The obtained result showed that the tested storage periods had a highly significant effect on all studied traits. Thus, the maximum mean values of germination power (%), germination percentage (%), roots and shoot length (cm), and seedling dry weight (g) traits were recorded at the begging of storage then a gradual decrease occurred. In addition, treating wheat grains with phosphine at different doses for different periods gained a significant increase in all studied traits compared to the control treatment (without fumigation), while there were no noticeable differences between most of the phosphine treatments themselves were found. Therefore, we suggest under the conditions of this study, wheat grains could be treated with 2 tablets of phosphine for a period of 72 hours to reduce the dose and increase the exposure time which could reduce the harmful effects of excessive doses of phosphine.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage periods had a highly significant effect on all studied traits of bread wheat grains.

Material
Giza 171e0
Treatment
storage periodse0
Outcome
all studied traitse1
Setting
laboratorye2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the vitality of bread wheat grains cv. Giza 171 at different storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–274 · show in text ↑
e1

“The obtained result showed that the tested storage periods had a highly significant effect on all studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the laboratory of Prof. Dr. Youssef Mohamed Omar, Plant Protection Department, Agriculture Faculty, Assiut University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–489 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination power and germination percentage of wheat grains were highest at the beginning of storage and then decreased gradually.

Treatment
storage periodse1
Outcome
germination power (%), germination percentage (%)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
begging of storagee0
Setting
laboratorye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum mean values of germination power (%), germination percentage (%), roots and shoot length (cm), and seedling dry weight (g) traits were recorded at the begging of storage then a gradual decrease occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“on the vitality of bread wheat grains cv. Giza 171 at different storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–274 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the laboratory of Prof. Dr. Youssef Mohamed Omar, Plant Protection Department, Agriculture Faculty, Assiut University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–489 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots and shoot length and seedling dry weight of wheat grains were highest at the beginning of storage and then decreased gradually.

Treatment
storage periodse1
Outcome
roots and shoot length (cm), and seedling dry weight (g)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
begging of storagee0
Setting
laboratorye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum mean values of germination power (%), germination percentage (%), roots and shoot length (cm), and seedling dry weight (g) traits were recorded at the begging of storage then a gradual decrease occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“on the vitality of bread wheat grains cv. Giza 171 at different storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–274 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the laboratory of Prof. Dr. Youssef Mohamed Omar, Plant Protection Department, Agriculture Faculty, Assiut University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphine fumigation at different doses and periods significantly increased all studied traits of wheat grains compared with the non-fumigated control.

Treatment
phosphine at different doses for different periodse0
Outcome
all studied traitse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatment (without fumigation)e0
Setting
laboratorye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating wheat grains with phosphine at different doses for different periods gained a significant increase in all studied traits compared to the control treatment (without fumigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1187 · show in text ↑
e1

“at the laboratory of Prof. Dr. Youssef Mohamed Omar, Plant Protection Department, Agriculture Faculty, Assiut University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most of the phosphine treatments did not differ noticeably from one another.

Treatment
phosphine treatmentse1
Outcome
noticeable differencese1
Direction
no noticeable differencese1
Comparator
most of the phosphine treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating wheat grains with phosphine at different doses for different periods gained a significant increase in all studied traits compared to the control treatment (without fumigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1187 · show in text ↑
e1

“while there were no noticeable differences between most of the phosphine treatments themselves were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1294 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest treating wheat grains with 2 tablets of phosphine for 72 hours under the study conditions to reduce the dose and the harmful effects of excessive doses.

Outcome
treated with 2 tablets of phosphine for a period of 72 hourse0
Qualifier
under the conditions of this studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we suggest under the conditions of this study, wheat grains could be treated with 2 tablets of phosphine for a period of 72 hours to reduce the dose and increase the exposure time which could reduce the harmful effects of excessive doses of phosphine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1557 · show in text ↑