Paper · 2023 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Agrarian Series

Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils

Yu. I. Mitrofanov; M. V. Gulyaev; Yu. D. Smirnova; et al.

12
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The paper shows efficiency of volumetric slotting, methods of basic treatment and their combined effect on the performance of field crops and agrophysical properties of drained soils. The experiments were carried out at the Gubino experimental agro-polygon of the All-Russian Research Institute of Reclaimed Lands (VNIIMZ), located at the reclamation facility in the Tver region. The soils under experiment are cultivated soddy-podzolic, light loamy gleyic, formed on a thin binomial, drained by closed pottery drainage method. Volumetric slotting was carried out to a depth of 45–50 cm with filling the subarable part (30–50 cm) with crushed straw, plant residues mixed with a humus layer. The slotting was carried out with a specially designed tool. Slot width – 16 cm, slotting pitch – 140 cm. Efficiency of ridge plowing, volumetric slotting of the soil and their joint action has been determined. The yield of oats during ridge plowing increased by an average of 0.36 t/ha (12.0 %) over 5 years, in case of slotting – by 0.60 (20.0 %), in case of combined action – by 0.82 t/ha, or 27.0 %. The share of slotting in the total increase in yield on average over 5 years was 73.2 %, ridge plowing – 26.8 %. The positive effect of slotting on the yield of field crops during the experiment was observed for 6 years. The total increase in yield from volumetric soil slotting on oats for 5 years was 3.0 tons of grain per 1 ha, with combined action with ridge plowing – 4.1 tons of grain per 1 ha, or 36.7 % higher. The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle. With slotting, these indicators increased by 8.4 and 11.3 %, with ridge plowing – by 6.1 and 12.0 %. The results of the research can be used in the development of agro-reclamation tillage systems and in adaptive agricultural technologies for the cultivation of spring grain crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge plowing increased oat yield over five years.

Treatment
ridge plowinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.36 t/hae0
Qualifier
over 5 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of oats during ridge plowing increased by an average of 0.36 t/ha (12.0 %) over 5 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slotting increased oat yield over five years.

Treatment
slottinge0
Outcome
yieldt1
Direction
increaset1
Value
0.60 (20.0 %)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of slotting – by 0.60 (20.0 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
t1

“The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined ridge plowing and slotting increased oat yield by 0.82 t/ha or 27.0%.

Treatment
combined actione0
Outcome
yieldt1
Direction
increaset1
Value
0.82 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of combined action – by 0.82 t/ha, or 27.0 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
t1

“The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1696 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slotting contributed 73.2% of the five year yield gain.

Outcome
share of slotting in the total increase in yielde0
Value
73.2 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The share of slotting in the total increase in yield on average over 5 years was 73.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
t1

“The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1696 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge plowing contributed 26.8% of the five year yield gain.

Outcome
yieldt1
Value
26.8 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ridge plowing – 26.8 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
t1

“The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1696 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slotting had a positive yield effect for six years.

Taxon
field cropse0
Outcome
positive effect of slotting on the yielde0
Value
6 yearse0

Verbatim

e0

“The positive effect of slotting on the yield of field crops during the experiment was observed for 6 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volumetric slotting increased cumulative oat yield by 3.0 tons of grain per hectare over five years.

Treatment
volumetric soil slottinge0
Outcome
total increase in yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.0 tons of grain per 1 hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total increase in yield from volumetric soil slotting on oats for 5 years was 3.0 tons of grain per 1 ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slotting combined with ridge plowing increased cumulative oat yield by 4.1 tons per hectare, 36.7% higher.

Treatment
combined action with ridge plowinge0
Outcome
yieldt1
Direction
highere0
Value
4.1 tons of grain per 1 hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with combined action with ridge plowing – 4.1 tons of grain per 1 ha, or 36.7 % higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
t1

“The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slotting increased productive stem number by 8.4%.

Treatment
slottinge0
Outcome
number of productive stemst1
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With slotting, these indicators increased by 8.4 and 11.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
t1

“The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slotting increased grain mass per panicle by 11.3%.

Treatment
slottinge0
Outcome
mass of grain in the paniclet1
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.3 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With slotting, these indicators increased by 8.4 and 11.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
t1

“The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge plowing increased productive stem number by 6.1%.

Treatment
ridge plowinge0
Outcome
number of productive stemst1
Direction
increaset1
Value
6.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with ridge plowing – by 6.1 and 12.0 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
t1

“The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge plowing increased grain mass per panicle by 12.0%.

Treatment
ridge plowinge0
Outcome
mass of grain in the paniclet1
Direction
increaset1
Value
12.0 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with ridge plowing – by 6.1 and 12.0 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Agromeliorative treatment of drained soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
t1

“The increase in the yield of oats, both with soil slotting and with ridge plowing, occurred due to an increase in the number of productive stems and the mass of grain in the panicle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1696 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.