Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the impact of brown seaweed extract (Ecklonia maxima) on the morphology and physiology of three different plant species. We conducted experiments using two types of fertilizers: an artificial fertilizer (0.1 g/L) and a biological extract of brown seaweed (Ecklonia maxima) at two concentrations (C1 at 1 mL/L and C2 at 2.5 mL/L). For melon, the application of C1 resulted in significant improvements in photosynthesis parameters, total chlorophyll content, and overall plant growth. When C2 was applied, it further enhanced these parameters, leading to a notable increase in shoot phytomass. In the case of cucumber, C1 led to increased resource allocation towards stems and leaves. Conversely, C2 increased the number of green leaves and contributed to higher shoot phytomass. For tomato plants, the application of C1 resulted in a slight increase in photosynthesis, but it did not significantly impact leaf growth. On the other hand, C2 induced a modest increase in photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, and root growth. In summary, our findings indicate that brown seaweed extract has a discernible influence on the physiology of the studied plants. However, the specific effects on resource allocation largely depend on the plant species and the concentration of the extract applied.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
C1 significantly improved melon photosynthesis, chlorophyll and growth.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis meloe0 - Treatment
- C1e0
- Outcome
- photosynthesis parameters, total chlorophyll content, and overall plant growthe0
- Direction
- improvementse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“For melon, the application of C1 resulted in significant improvements in photosynthesis parameters, total chlorophyll content, and overall plant growth.”
Claim · model-written summary
C2 further enhanced melon photosynthesis, chlorophyll and growth.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“When C2 was applied, it further enhanced these parameters, leading to a notable increase in shoot phytomass.”
Claim · model-written summary
C1 increased cucumber resource allocation to stems and leaves.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- C1e0
- Outcome
- resource allocation towards stems and leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the case of cucumber, C1 led to increased resource allocation towards stems and leaves.”
Claim · model-written summary
C2 increased cucumber green leaf number and shoot phytomass.
- Treatment
- C2e0
- Outcome
- number of green leaves and contributed to higher shoot phytomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Conversely, C2 increased the number of green leaves and contributed to higher shoot phytomass.”
Claim · model-written summary
C1 slightly increased tomato photosynthesis.
- Taxon
- tomato plants
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- C1e0
- Outcome
- photosynthesise0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- slighte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“For tomato plants, the application of C1 resulted in a slight increase in photosynthesis, but it did not significantly impact leaf growth.”
Claim · model-written summary
C1 did not significantly affect tomato leaf growth.
- Taxon
- tomato plants
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- C1e0
- Outcome
- leaf growthe0
- Direction
- did not significantly impacte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“For tomato plants, the application of C1 resulted in a slight increase in photosynthesis, but it did not significantly impact leaf growth.”
Claim · model-written summary
C2 modestly increased tomato photosynthesis, chlorophyll content and root growth.
- Treatment
- C2e0
- Outcome
- photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, and root growthe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- modeste0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“On the other hand, C2 induced a modest increase in photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, and root growth.”