Paper · 2023 · Plants

Crop-Livestock Integration Improves Physical Soil, Agronomic and Environmental Aspects in Soybean Cultivation

Jordaanny Danyelly Pereira Lima; Aline Borges Torino; Luciana Maria da Silva; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soybean is one of the most widely grown crops in the world and technologies are increasingly needed to increase productivity without impacting environmental degradation. In this context, the aim was to evaluate the action of forage plants of the genus Brachiaria sp. in crop–livestock integration on physical soil, agronomic and environmental aspects of soybean cultivation. The experiment was conducted in a subdivided plot design with seven integrated systems corresponding to the previous cultivation of Paiaguas palisadegrass, Xaraes palisadegrass and Ruziziensis grass in monocropping and intercropped with maize, as well as maize in monocropping. In the subplots, two grass management systems were evaluated: free growth and a grazing simulation cut. The bulk density and least limiting water range were assessed using soil samples and, after the pastures were desiccated when the soybean crop was planted, straw decomposition and plantability. A soil physics diagnosis by the bulk density and least limiting water range showed that the Paiaguas palisadegrass and Xaraes palisadegrass improved the soil environment due to biological soil loosening. The remaining mulch biomass did not affect soybean sowing and the adoption of Brachiaria sp. grass in the off-season, in addition to contributing to the provision of environmental services, and did not compromise grain productivity in succession.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paiaguas palisadegrass improved the soil environment through biological loosening.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Paiaguas palisadegrasse0
Outcome
soil environmente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Paiaguas palisadegrass and Xaraes palisadegrass improved the soil environment due to biological soil loosening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1153 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xaraes palisadegrass improved the soil environment through biological loosening.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Xaraes palisadegrasse0
Outcome
soil environmente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Paiaguas palisadegrass and Xaraes palisadegrass improved the soil environment due to biological soil loosening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1153 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Remaining mulch biomass did not affect soybean sowing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
remaining mulch biomasse0
Outcome
soybean sowinge0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The remaining mulch biomass did not affect soybean sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Off-season Brachiaria contributed environmental services.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Brachiaria sp. grasse0
Outcome
provision of environmental servicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the adoption of Brachiaria sp. grass in the off-season, in addition to contributing to the provision of environmental services”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Off-season Brachiaria did not compromise subsequent grain productivity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
Brachiaria sp. grasse1
Outcome
grain productivitye0
Direction
did not compromisee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not compromise grain productivity in succession”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1400 · show in text ↑
e1

“the adoption of Brachiaria sp. grass in the off-season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1271 · show in text ↑
e2

“soybean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–373 · show in text ↑

Brachiaria · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.