Abstract
Aim. To study the effect of long-term use of the main tillage and fertilization systems on the agrophysical properties of the soil in soybean crops, the yield of the crop and efficiency of the production under the researched technologies. Methods. The research was conducted during 2019–2022 in a stationary two-factor field experiment, which includes 5 systems of basic tillage (shelf, flat-cut, chisel, disk, differentiated) and two fertilization systems: mineral (background 1) – N60Р60K60; and organo-mineral (background 2) - precursor straw + N10/t of straw + N30Р30K30 in a short-rotation 4-field crop rotation with the following crop rotation: soybean, spring barley, white mustard, winter wheat. Results. The results of studies on the influence of main tillage systems, methods of fertilization on the main field agrophysical parameters of the soil and the formation of the soybean crop in the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine are presented in order to identify the most effective, adapted to the conditions that have developed in recent years. It was found that the most favorable agrophysical soil conditions for soybeans were created under the chisel system of the main cultivation and chiselling in a differentiated system against the background of both mineral and organo-mineral fertilization and the advantage of the mentioned indicators of the organo-mineral background over the mineral one. The highest yield of soybeans (2.55 t/ha) was obtained under the chisel system of the main tillage against the background of organic-mineral fertilizer, which exceeded the control (police system) by 0.25 t/ha (11%) and similar to the highest indicator (2.49 t/ha) against the background of mineral fertilizer and an advantage over the control by 0.12 t/ha (5%). All shelf-free systems on the background of organic-mineral fertilizer exceeded the control by 1–11% in terms of productivity, and similar systems on the background of mineral fertilizer by 1–4%. Conclusions. According to the best indicators of the physical condition of the soil and their influence on soybean yield, the chisel system of the main tillage to a depth of 25–27 cm against the background of organo-mineral fertilization with the leaving of winter wheat straw + N10 per ton of straw and the introduction of mineral fertilizer in the dose of N30Р30К30 can be considered promising and the most adapted to production under the conditions of recent years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The chisel system of main tillage created the most favorable agrophysical soil conditions for soybeans.
- Taxon
- soybeans
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- chisel system of the main cultivatione1
- Outcome
- agrophysical soil conditionse1
- Direction
- most favorablee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the most favorable agrophysical soil conditions for soybeans were created under the chisel system of the main cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
The organo-mineral background had an advantage over the mineral background for the mentioned agrophysical indicators under soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- organo-mineral backgrounde2
- Outcome
- mentioned indicatorse2
- Direction
- advantagee2
- Comparator
- the mineral onee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the most favorable agrophysical soil conditions for soybeans were created under the chisel system of the main cultivation”
e2“the advantage of the mentioned indicators of the organo-mineral background over the mineral one”
Claim · model-written summary
Chisel main tillage with organo-mineral fertilization gave the highest soybean yield and exceeded the control (police system) by 0.25 t/ha (11%).
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe2
- Treatment
- chisel system of the main tillagee2
- Outcome
- yield of soybeanse2
- Direction
- exceedede1
- Value
- 0.25 t/ha (11%)e1
- Comparator
- control (police system)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“which exceeded the control (police system) by 0.25 t/ha (11%)”
e2“The highest yield of soybeans (2.55 t/ha) was obtained under the chisel system of the main tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Chisel main tillage against the mineral fertilizer background gave a soybean yield advantage of 0.12 t/ha (5%) over the control.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe2
- Treatment
- chisel system of the main tillagee2
- Outcome
- yield of soybeanse2
- Direction
- advantagee1
- Value
- 0.12 t/ha (5%)e1
- Qualifier
- against the background of mineral fertilizere1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“against the background of mineral fertilizer and an advantage over the control by 0.12 t/ha (5%)”
e2“The highest yield of soybeans (2.55 t/ha) was obtained under the chisel system of the main tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield under the mineral fertilizer background was similar to the highest indicator (2.49 t/ha).
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe2
- Outcome
- yield of soybeanse2
- Value
- 2.49 t/hae1
- Qualifier
- similar to the highest indicatore1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“similar to the highest indicator (2.49 t/ha) against the background of mineral fertilizer”
e2“The highest yield of soybeans”
Claim · model-written summary
All shelf-free tillage systems on the organic-mineral background exceeded the control by 1–11% in productivity.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe2
- Treatment
- shelf-free systemse1
- Outcome
- productivitye1
- Direction
- exceedede1
- Value
- 1–11%e1
- Qualifier
- on the background of organic-mineral fertilizere1
- Comparator
- the controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“All shelf-free systems on the background of organic-mineral fertilizer exceeded the control by 1–11% in terms of productivity”
e2“The highest yield of soybeans”
Claim · model-written summary
Similar shelf-free tillage systems on the mineral background exceeded the control by 1–4% in productivity.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe3
- Treatment
- similar systemse1
- Outcome
- productivitye2
- Direction
- exceedede2
- Value
- 1–4%e1
- Qualifier
- on the background of mineral fertilizere1
- Comparator
- the controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“and similar systems on the background of mineral fertilizer by 1–4%”
e2“exceeded the control by 1–11% in terms of productivity”
e3“The highest yield of soybeans”
Claim · model-written summary
The chisel system of main tillage to a depth of 25–27 cm with organo-mineral fertilization can be considered promising and most adapted to production for soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe3
- Outcome
- the chisel system of the main tillage to a depth of 25–27 cme1
- Qualifier
- under the conditions of recent yearse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the chisel system of the main tillage to a depth of 25–27 cm against the background of organo-mineral fertilization”
e2“can be considered promising and the most adapted to production under the conditions of recent years”
e3“The highest yield of soybeans”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.