Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Response of Forage Yield and Quality of Oats (Avena sativa L.) to Planting Distances and Mowing Dates

Nihad M. Abood; Abed Ul-Lateef Mahmood Alkaisy; Shamil I. Neamah; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was carried out during the winter season of 2020-2021 in the Habbaniyah district, west of Baghdad, to study the response of forage yield and quality of oats Avena sativa L. var. Shifaa to planting distances and mowing dates. A split plots arrangement according to the RCBD at three replications was used. The main plots included planting distances, while the subplots included the mowing dates. The study’s results indicated that the planting distance of 25 cm between lines was significantly superior in the green forage yield and fiber percentage 12.00 ton ha -1 and 37.61%, respectively. In comparison, the planting distance of 20 cm between lines was significantly superior in the protein percentage 12.34%. As for the mowing dates, the mowing after 70 days was selected substantially in the forage yield and fiber percentage. The mowing after 50 days was significantly superior in protein percentage 12.28%. The interaction between studied factors significantly affected the most studied traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25 cm spacing, green forage yield was significantly superior at 12.00 ton ha -1.

Treatment
planting distance of 25 cm between linese0
Outcome
green forage yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
12.00 ton ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the planting distance of 25 cm between lines was significantly superior in the green forage yield and fiber percentage 12.00 ton ha -1 and 37.61%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oats (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25 cm spacing, fiber percentage was significantly superior at 37.61%.

Treatment
planting distance of 25 cm between linese0
Outcome
fiber percentagee0
Direction
superiore0
Value
37.61%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the planting distance of 25 cm between lines was significantly superior in the green forage yield and fiber percentage 12.00 ton ha -1 and 37.61%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oats (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 cm spacing, protein percentage was significantly superior at 12.34%.

Treatment
planting distance of 20 cm between linese0
Outcome
protein percentagee0
Direction
superiore0
Value
12.34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the planting distance of 20 cm between lines was significantly superior in the protein percentage 12.34%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oats (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing after 70 days was superior for forage yield and fiber percentage.

Treatment
mowing after 70 dayse0
Outcome
forage yield and fiber percentagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mowing after 70 days was selected substantially in the forage yield and fiber percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oats (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing after 50 days produced significantly superior protein percentage of 12.28%.

Treatment
mowing after 50 dayse0
Outcome
protein percentagee0
Direction
superiore0
Value
12.28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mowing after 50 days was significantly superior in protein percentage 12.28%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oats (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing and mowing date interacted significantly for most measured traits.

Treatment
planting distances and mowing datese1
Outcome
most studied traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between studied factors significantly affected the most studied traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oats (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting distances and mowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–251 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: grain · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pruning · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.