Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Agriculture Biology & Environment

nteractive Effects of Tillage and Mulch Type on Soil and Crop Canopy Temperature and Yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor, L)

Edmore Hungwe; Veronica Makuvaro; Johnson Masaka; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This paper investigates the interactive effects that tillage and mulch types have on soil and crop canopy temperature and the subsequent influence on final grain yields of a sorghum (Sorghum bicolor var rakodzi) crop stand. Two experimental sites, one farmer managed, and the other researcher managed were established in Mbire District of Mashonaland West Province in Zimbabwe during the 2020/2021 Zimbabwean farming season. A 3x4 factorial experiment laid in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications, was conducted to investigate the hypothesis that tillage and mulch have no effect on soil and crop canopy temperatures. Significant interactions (P<0.05) occurred between mulch and tillage types to influence canopy temperature at critical stages oflate vegetative and grain filling at 25 and 75 days after sowing, respectively. Mulch and tillage types also interacted significantly (p<0.05) at critical stages of booting and grain filling at 50 and 75 days after sowing respectively to subsequently influence final grain yield. Sorghum straw used as mulch in raised beds resulted in the highest grain yields of 2.89 tons Ha-1. Conversely, lowest grain yields were realized from raised beds with no mulch as 1.89 tons Ha-1. Thus, it was established that tillage and mulch can interact to affect both crop canopy and soil temperature at crop critical stages that will in turn impact on crop final grain yields. Farmers in the semi-arid regions of Zimbabwe are encouraged to be cognisant of this interactive effect tomaximise sorghum crop productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and tillage interacted significantly to affect canopy temperature at late vegetative and grain-filling stages.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
mulch and tillage typese0
Outcome
canopy temperaturee0
Qualifier
25 and 75 days after sowinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions (P<0.05) occurred between mulch and tillage types to influence canopy temperature at critical stages oflate vegetative and grain filling at 25 and 75 days after sowing, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and tillage interacted significantly at booting and grain filling to influence final grain yield.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Mulch and tillage typese0
Outcome
final grain yielde0
Qualifier
50 and 75 days after sowinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch and tillage types also interacted significantly (p<0.05) at critical stages of booting and grain filling at 50 and 75 days after sowing respectively to subsequently influence final grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum straw mulch on raised beds gave the highest grain yield, 2.89 tons Ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Sorghum straw used as mulch in raised bedse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.89 tons Ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum straw used as mulch in raised beds resulted in the highest grain yields of 2.89 tons Ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds without mulch gave the lowest grain yield, 1.89 tons Ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
raised beds with no mulche0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.89 tons Ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest grain yields were realized from raised beds with no mulch as 1.89 tons Ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · SorghumResults differ

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.