Abstract
In order to study the effects of Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applications on some physiological and morphological treats of Cucurbita pepo an experiment was conducted based on Randomized Complete Block Design at Azerbaijan Shahid Madani University Research Farm. The result showed that the foliar application had significant effects on plant length, number of auxiliary branches, leaf number, number of female flower, total number of fruit, fruit diameter, fruit fresh weight, intact fruit number, fruit yield, number of intact and immature seeds in fruits and oil percent. The highest number of auxiliary branches, plant height, leaf number per plant and the highest data for oil percent, seed length, fruit fresh weight and fruit diameter were recorded at 1 and 2 L ha-1 foliar application. The highest data for intact seed number was recorded at 1 L ha-1 foliar application but, the highest number of immature seeds were recorded at 2 and 3 L ha-1 foliar application. The highest data for female flower number and total number of fruits per plant were recorded at 1 L ha-1 treatment. The treatment used in this experiment had not significant effects on protein content, seed dry weight, leaf dry weight, potassium and phosphor concentrations. Considering the fact that, in the present experiment there was no significant difference between 1 and 2 L ha-1 of Dekap foliar applications in some of the evaluated traits, so, we can claim that 1 L ha-1 Dekap foliar application can be recommended for the extension section.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Dekap foliar application significantly affected plant length, branching and leaf number.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.
Cucurbita pepot0 - Treatment
- Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applicationse1
- Outcome
- plant length, number of auxiliary branches, leaf numbere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the foliar application had significant effects on plant length, number of auxiliary branches, leaf number, number of female flower, total number of fruit, fruit diameter, fruit fresh weight, intact fruit number, fruit yield, number of intact and immature seeds in fruits and oil percent.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
e1“Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Dekap foliar application significantly affected female flower number and fruit count.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applicationse1
- Outcome
- number of female flower, total number of fruite0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the foliar application had significant effects on plant length, number of auxiliary branches, leaf number, number of female flower, total number of fruit, fruit diameter, fruit fresh weight, intact fruit number, fruit yield, number of intact and immature seeds in fruits and oil percent.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
e1“Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Dekap foliar application significantly affected fruit diameter, fresh weight and yield.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applicationse1
- Outcome
- fruit diameter, fruit fresh weight, intact fruit numbere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the foliar application had significant effects on plant length, number of auxiliary branches, leaf number, number of female flower, total number of fruit, fruit diameter, fruit fresh weight, intact fruit number, fruit yield, number of intact and immature seeds in fruits and oil percent.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
e1“Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Dekap foliar application significantly affected intact and immature seed counts and oil percentage.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applicationse2
- Outcome
- number of intact and immature seeds in fruits and oil percente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of intact and immature seeds in fruits and oil percent.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
e1“the foliar application had significant effects on”
e2“Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applications”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest branching, height and leaf number occurred at 1 and 2 L ha-1.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- 1 and 2 L ha-1 foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- number of auxiliary branches, plant height, leaf number per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest number of auxiliary branches, plant height, leaf number per plant and the highest data for oil percent, seed length, fruit fresh weight and fruit diameter were recorded at 1 and 2 L ha-1 foliar application.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Oil percentage and seed length were highest at 1 and 2 L ha-1.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- 1 and 2 L ha-1 foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- oil percent, seed lengthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest number of auxiliary branches, plant height, leaf number per plant and the highest data for oil percent, seed length, fruit fresh weight and fruit diameter were recorded at 1 and 2 L ha-1 foliar application.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit fresh weight and diameter were highest at 1 and 2 L ha-1.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- 1 and 2 L ha-1 foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- fruit fresh weight and fruit diametere0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest number of auxiliary branches, plant height, leaf number per plant and the highest data for oil percent, seed length, fruit fresh weight and fruit diameter were recorded at 1 and 2 L ha-1 foliar application.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intact seed number was highest at 1 L ha-1.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- 1 L ha-1 foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- intact seed numbere0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest data for intact seed number was recorded at 1 L ha-1 foliar application”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Immature seed number was highest at 2 and 3 L ha-1.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- 2 and 3 L ha-1 foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- number of immature seedse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest number of immature seeds were recorded at 2 and 3 L ha-1 foliar application.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Female flower and fruit numbers were highest at 1 L ha-1.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- 1 L ha-1 treatmente0
- Outcome
- female flower number and total number of fruits per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest data for female flower number and total number of fruits per plant were recorded at 1 L ha-1 treatment.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dekap had no significant effect on protein content and seed or leaf dry weight.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applicationse1
- Outcome
- protein content, seed dry weight, leaf dry weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment used in this experiment had not significant effects on protein content, seed dry weight, leaf dry weight, potassium and phosphor concentrations.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
e1“Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Dekap had no significant effect on potassium and phosphor concentrations.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Treatment
- Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applicationse1
- Outcome
- potassium and phosphor concentrationse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment used in this experiment had not significant effects on protein content, seed dry weight, leaf dry weight, potassium and phosphor concentrations.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
e1“Dekap (0, 1, 2 and 3 L ha-1) foliar applications”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommended 1 L ha-1 Dekap foliar application for extension.
- Taxon
- Cucurbita pepo L.Cucurbita pepot0
- Outcome
- 1 L ha-1 Dekap foliar applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1 L ha-1 Dekap foliar application can be recommended for the extension section.”
t0“Cucurbita pepo L.”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Cucurbita pepoPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · yield · Cucurbita pepoResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.