Paper · 2023 · Environment and Ecology

Management of Anthracnose Disease of Chilli caused by Colletotrichum capsici

Shambhavi Tiwari; Pradip Kumar; Jay Prakash Singh; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chilli crop suffers from various diseases in which anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum capsici is a very serious one, causes huge yield losses in India. The present investigation was carried out to find out its suitable control measures by evaluating different fungicides including botanicals and bio-agent first in vitro followed by in field at MES, Vegetable Science, ANDUAT, Kumarganj, Ayodhya. In vitro propiconazole @ 0.1% and hexaconazole @ 0.1% completely inhibited growth of the fungus followed by copper oxychloride @ 0.4%, garlic bulb extract @5% and NSKE @ 5% and Trichoderma harzianum @5% which inhibited (80.88%) mycelial growth of the fungus. In field conditions seed treatment with T. harzianum + Foliar spray with propiconazole was found best with minimum disease intensity (9.37%) and highest yield (151.42 q/ha) in comparison to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole completely inhibited fungal growth in vitro.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
propiconazole @ 0.1%e0
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt1pathogen
Outcome
growth of the funguse0
Direction
completely inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“propiconazole @ 0.1% and hexaconazole @ 0.1% completely inhibited growth of the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexaconazole completely inhibited fungal growth in vitro.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
hexaconazole @ 0.1%e0
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt1pathogen
Outcome
growth of the funguse0
Direction
completely inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“propiconazole @ 0.1% and hexaconazole @ 0.1% completely inhibited growth of the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum inhibited fungal mycelial growth by 80.88% in vitro.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
Trichoderma harzianum @5%e0
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt1pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growth of the funguse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
80.88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma harzianum @5% which inhibited (80.88%) mycelial growth of the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with T. harzianum and foliar propiconazole gave the lowest disease intensity, 9.37%, among treatments.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
seed treatment with T. harzianum + Foliar spray with propiconazolee0
Interactor
Colletotrichum capsiciColletotrichum truncatumt1pathogen
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
minimume0
Value
9.37%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with T. harzianum + Foliar spray with propiconazole was found best with minimum disease intensity (9.37%) and highest yield (151.42 q/ha) in comparison to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“Colletotrichum capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the highest field yield, 151.42 q/ha.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
seed treatment with T. harzianum + Foliar spray with propiconazolee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
151.42 q/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with T. harzianum + Foliar spray with propiconazole was found best with minimum disease intensity (9.37%) and highest yield (151.42 q/ha) in comparison to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑

propiconazole · Colletotrichum truncatum · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

propiconazole · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Colletotrichum truncatum · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · Colletotrichum truncatum · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 73 positive, 1 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · Colletotrichum truncatum · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.