Paper · 2023 · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research

Peanut (Arachis hypogea) accessions differentially accumulate aflatoxins upon challenge by Aspergillus flavus: Implications for aflatoxin mitigation

Elsie Nyangweso Salano; Richard Mwanza Mulwa; Meshack Amos Obonyo

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Peanut is among the most important oil crops grown in sub-Saharan Africa for its nutritive value and economic benefit. In this region, Aspergillus flavus infects peanuts and contaminates produce with aflatoxins leading to food insecurity through lowered quality. The impact of aflatoxins transcends the food chain causing harm to human and animal health. The selection and production of aflatoxin-tolerant varieties of peanut is a promising strategy to mitigate their potential harm. We studied the resistance of peanut kernels to aflatoxin accumulation in 25 peanut accessions collected from different growing locations in Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda based on their unique phenotypic characteristics. To obtain sufficient planting material, the peanut accessions were multiplied separately under standard conditions and harvested at their respective maturity dates then dried and stored at 4 °C before further analysis. At the start of the experiment, the kernels were challenged with a laboratory-characterized toxigenic strain (Aspergillus flavus 1EM1901) and incubated at 28 °C for 7 days. Afterward, the accessions were analysed (ELISA) for aflatoxins. Of the 25 accessions tested, 60 % (n = 15) exhibited kernel resistance to aflatoxin accumulation while 40 % (n = 10) were susceptible (with aflatoxin levels ranging from 0.54 ppb to 1692.92 ppb). Two of the resistant accessions recorded a decrease in aflatoxin accumulation when challenged with toxigenic A. flavus. This differential accumulation of aflatoxins suggests the existence of an inherent trait that can be exploited in breeding programs of peanut varieties with low aflatoxin accumulation when grown in contaminated soils. These findings are further discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen of 25 peanut accessions showed kernel resistance to aflatoxin accumulation after challenge.

Material
accessionse0
Outcome
kernel resistance to aflatoxin accumulatione0
Value
60 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the 25 accessions tested, 60 % (n = 15) exhibited kernel resistance to aflatoxin accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1252 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut accessions were multiplied separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–788 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten of 25 peanut accessions were susceptible to aflatoxin accumulation, with levels from 0.54 to 1692.92 ppb.

Material
accessionse1
Outcome
aflatoxin levelse0
Value
0.54 ppb to 1692.92 ppbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“40 % (n = 10) were susceptible (with aflatoxin levels ranging from 0.54 ppb to 1692.92 ppb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1350 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut accessions were multiplied separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two resistant peanut accessions had decreased aflatoxin accumulation when challenged with toxigenic A. flavus.

Material
resistant accessionse0
Treatment
challenged with toxigenic A. flavuse0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
aflatoxin accumulatione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
Twoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two of the resistant accessions recorded a decrease in aflatoxin accumulation when challenged with toxigenic A. flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1470 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut accessions were multiplied separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–788 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest differential aflatoxin accumulation can be exploited in breeding low-accumulation peanut varieties.

Outcome
breeding programs of peanut varieties with low aflatoxin accumulatione0
Qualifier
contaminated soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This differential accumulation of aflatoxins suggests the existence of an inherent trait that can be exploited in breeding programs of peanut varieties with low aflatoxin accumulation when grown in contaminated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1688 · show in text ↑

Aspergillus flavus · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

infection · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.