Paper · 2023 · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research

Exploring the interaction effects between common bean cultivars and rhizobia inoculation on plant growth and yield

Eduardo Hélder Horácio; Freddy Eli Zambrano Gavilanes; Marcos Vinicius Feliciano; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Assuming that common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ in terms of the potential to respond to symbiosis with rhizobia, in this direction, this work aimed to identify those that are more efficient and responsive to biological nitrogen fixation. The interaction of common bean cultivars and rhizobia inoculation at greenhouse conditions was evaluated. Six common bean cultivars (IPR-Sabiá, IPR-Quero-Quero, IPR-Andorinha, IPR-Curió, IPR-Tangará, and IPR-Campos Gerais) were inoculated using a mixture of rhizobia strains (Rhizobium tropici and R. freirei). The completely randomized experimental design arranged in a 6 × 2 factorial scheme with five replications was used. Growth, nodulation, and yield performance of common bean cultivars with and without rhizobia inoculation were evaluated. Rhizobia strains increased nodulation, plant growth, and grain yield in all cultivars used. There was an influence of interaction between rhizobia inoculation and common bean cultivars on root volume, and on dry matter root and shoot. The cultivar IPR-Curió showed the highest number of nodules and nodule dry matter. It can be concluded that the inoculation was consistent for all cultivars used, but some differences in the response from the cultivars indicate a possible effect of the genotype.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobia inoculation increased nodulation, plant growth, and grain yield in all six common bean cultivars compared with no inoculation under greenhouse conditions.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise4
Material
common bean cultivarse3
Treatment
rhizobia inoculatione3
Interactor
rhizobia strainse1symbiont
Outcome
nodulation, plant growth, and grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
without rhizobia inoculatione2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rhizobia strains increased nodulation, plant growth, and grain yield in all cultivars used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–892 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth, nodulation, and yield performance of common bean cultivars with and without rhizobia inoculation were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–800 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction of common bean cultivars and rhizobia inoculation at greenhouse conditions was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–358 · show in text ↑
e4

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interaction between rhizobia inoculation and cultivar influenced root volume and root and shoot dry matter.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Material
common bean cultivarse1
Treatment
rhizobia inoculatione1
Outcome
root volume, and on dry matter root and shoote1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was an influence of interaction between rhizobia inoculation and common bean cultivars on root volume, and on dry matter root and shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1035 · show in text ↑
e2

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar IPR-Curió had the highest number of nodules and nodule dry matter.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Material
IPR-Curióe1
Outcome
number of nodules and nodule dry mattere1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cultivar IPR-Curió showed the highest number of nodules and nodule dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–63 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation response was consistent across cultivars, but cultivar differences suggest a possible genotype effect.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Material
cultivarse1
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
differences in the responsee1
Qualifier
possible effect of the genotypee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the inoculation was consistent for all cultivars used, but some differences in the response from the cultivars indicate a possible effect of the genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1298 · show in text ↑
e2

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–63 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.