Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Response of rice (Oryza sativa) hybrids to integrated nitrogen management under different methods of cultivation

A.L. JAT; V.K. SRIVASTAVA; AVIJIT SEN; et al.

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2012 and 2013 at Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, to study the effect of integrated nitrogen management on performance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) hybrids under different methods of cultivation on sandy clay-loam soil. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with 2 crop-establishment methods and 2 hybrids assigned to main plots, and 6 integrated nitrogen-management treatments were allocated in subplots and replicated thrice. Transplanting of rice under system of rice intensifica- tion (SRI) and rice cv. Arize 6444 recorded significantly higher growth attributes, viz. plant height, tillers/hill, leaf- area index, and dry-matter accumulation/hill, with almost all yield-attributing characters and yield, except plant height and panicle length which were significantly higher PHB 71 than Arize 6444. The SRI planting increased the grain and straw yield by 14.76% and 13.11% over normal transplanting. Similarly, SRI planting and Arize 6444 cultivar also gave significantly maximum benefit in respect to gross returns, net returns ( 66,138 and 61,535/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.86 and 1.66) over normal transplanting and PHB 71. Among all the inte- grated nitrogen-management treatments, application of 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillum recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes, grain yield (6.94 t/ha), straw yield (9.16 t/ha), harvest index, net monetary returns ( 68,064/ha), but application of 125% RDN was found economically feasible in respect to benefit: cost ratio (1.88) owing to lower cost of cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Arize 6444 had significantly higher growth and most yield attributes than PHB 71.

Material
Arize 6444e0
Outcome
growth attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
PHB 71e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice cv. Arize 6444 recorded significantly higher growth attributes, viz. plant height, tillers/hill, leaf- area index, and dry-matter accumulation/hill, with almost all yield-attributing characters and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“than Arize 6444”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–874 · show in text ↑
e2

“PHB 71 than Arize 6444”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PHB 71 had significantly higher plant height than Arize 6444.

Material
PHB 71e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Arize 6444e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except plant height and panicle length which were significantly higher PHB 71 than Arize 6444”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PHB 71 had significantly higher panicle length than Arize 6444.

Material
PHB 71e0
Outcome
panicle lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Arize 6444e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except plant height and panicle length which were significantly higher PHB 71 than Arize 6444”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased grain yield by 14.76% over normal transplanting.

Treatment
SRI plantinge0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.76%e0
Comparator
normal transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SRI planting increased the grain and straw yield by 14.76% and 13.11% over normal transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–976 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (6.94 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased straw yield by 13.11% over normal transplanting.

Treatment
SRI plantinge0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.11%e0
Comparator
normal transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SRI planting increased the grain and straw yield by 14.76% and 13.11% over normal transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI planting gave maximum gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio over normal transplanting.

Treatment
SRI plantinge0
Outcome
gross returns, net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
normal transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SRI planting and Arize 6444 cultivar also gave significantly maximum benefit in respect to gross returns, net returns ( 66,138 and 61,535/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.86 and 1.66) over normal transplanting and PHB 71.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Arize 6444 gave maximum gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio over PHB 71.

Material
Arize 6444e0
Outcome
gross returns, net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
PHB 71e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SRI planting and Arize 6444 cultivar also gave significantly maximum benefit in respect to gross returns, net returns ( 66,138 and 61,535/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.86 and 1.66) over normal transplanting and PHB 71.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDN plus 50% FYM nitrogen plus Azospirillum treatment gave significantly higher growth and yield attributes.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
growth attributes, yield attributese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillum recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes, grain yield (6.94 t/ha), straw yield (9.16 t/ha), harvest index, net monetary returns ( 68,064/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDN plus FYM plus Azospirillum treatment produced grain yield of 6.94 t/ha.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.94 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillum recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes, grain yield (6.94 t/ha), straw yield (9.16 t/ha), harvest index, net monetary returns ( 68,064/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDN plus FYM plus Azospirillum treatment produced straw yield of 9.16 t/ha.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.16 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillum recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes, grain yield (6.94 t/ha), straw yield (9.16 t/ha), harvest index, net monetary returns ( 68,064/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDN plus FYM plus Azospirillum treatment gave higher harvest index.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillum recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes, grain yield (6.94 t/ha), straw yield (9.16 t/ha), harvest index, net monetary returns ( 68,064/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDN plus FYM plus Azospirillum treatment gave net monetary returns of 68,064/ha.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
net monetary returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
68,064/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) + 50% N through FYM + Azospirillum recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes, grain yield (6.94 t/ha), straw yield (9.16 t/ha), harvest index, net monetary returns ( 68,064/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 125% RDN was economically feasible for benefit-cost ratio, at 1.88.

Treatment
125% RDNe0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Value
1.88e0
Qualifier
lower cost of cultivatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 125% RDN was found economically feasible in respect to benefit: cost ratio (1.88) owing to lower cost of cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.