Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Sustaining Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) productivity and soil health through varietal diversification under diverse production systems

SHASHANK PATEL; S.S. RATHORE; KAPILA SHEKHAWAT; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Indian mustard is one of the most important oilseed crop in India as it contributes maximally in domestic edible oil production. Inclusion of Indian mustard in cereal based cropping system is increasingly felt due to its beneficial effect in the system and comparatively lesser requirement of resources, hence lesser environmental footprints. To assess the feasibility of different cultures for profitable diversification, as field experiment was conducted during rabi 2020–21 at the research farm of IARI, New Delhi. The varietal diversification in Indian mustard has further helped in bringing the resilience in the production system. The study revealed that Pusa mustard 26 under integrated crop management system resulted in higher seed yield (2,206, kg/ha), biological yield (10,711 kg/ha), oil yield (877.0 kg/ha) and also enhanced net return (`76,060/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa mustard 26 under integrated management had higher seed yield.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae1
Material
Pusa mustard 26e0
Treatment
integrated crop management systeme0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2,206, kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa mustard 26 under integrated crop management system resulted in higher seed yield (2,206, kg/ha), biological yield (10,711 kg/ha), oil yield (877.0 kg/ha) and also enhanced net return (`76,060/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inclusion of Indian mustard in cereal based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa mustard 26 under integrated management had higher biological yield.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae1
Material
Pusa mustard 26e0
Treatment
integrated crop management systeme0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10,711 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa mustard 26 under integrated crop management system resulted in higher seed yield (2,206, kg/ha), biological yield (10,711 kg/ha), oil yield (877.0 kg/ha) and also enhanced net return (`76,060/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inclusion of Indian mustard in cereal based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa mustard 26 under integrated management had higher oil yield.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae1
Material
Pusa mustard 26e0
Treatment
integrated crop management systeme0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
877.0 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa mustard 26 under integrated crop management system resulted in higher seed yield (2,206, kg/ha), biological yield (10,711 kg/ha), oil yield (877.0 kg/ha) and also enhanced net return (`76,060/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inclusion of Indian mustard in cereal based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa mustard 26 under integrated management had enhanced net return.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae1
Material
Pusa mustard 26e0
Treatment
integrated crop management systeme0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
`76,060/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pusa mustard 26 under integrated crop management system resulted in higher seed yield (2,206, kg/ha), biological yield (10,711 kg/ha), oil yield (877.0 kg/ha) and also enhanced net return (`76,060/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inclusion of Indian mustard in cereal based cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–188 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.