Paper · 2024 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Conservation agriculture practices in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)-basedcropping systems for enhanced productivity and profitability

R S JAT; H V SINGH; R L CHOUDHARY; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present study was carried out during 2019–20 and 2020–21 at the research farm of ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan to scale out the conservation agriculture (CA) practices in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.]-based cropping systems for enhancing production and farm profitability. Experiment was conducted in the split-plot design (SPD) after randomization, and replicated three times in the permanent plots. The treatment comprised of 3-tillage and crop residue re-cycling [permanent beds with residue (PB+R); zero tillage with residue (ZT+R); and conventional tillage without residue (CT-R)] in main-plots; and 6-oilseed brassica-based cropping systems [Fallow-mustard (F-M); Cluster bean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]-mustard (CB-M); Greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek-mustard (GG-M); Maize (Zea mays L.)-mustard (Mz-M); Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]-mustard (PM-M); and Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)-mustard (S-M)] in sub-plots. The mean mustard seed yield increased 28 and 11% under permanent beds with residue (PB+R) and zero tillage with residue (ZT+R) compared to conventional tillage without residue (CT-R), respectively. The mean seed yield of kharif crops also increased by 37.1 and 31.7% in the PB+R and ZT+R compared to CT-R, respectively. The maize-mustard (Mz-M) cropping system recorded significantly higher yield of mustard across the years followed by greengram-mustard (GG-M) cropping system. The mean mustard equivalent yield (MEY) increased by 33.4 and 24.2% in PB+R and ZT+R over the CT-R, respectively. The total system grain yield (TSGY) also increased by 29.6 and 14.7% in the PB+R and ZT+R over the CT-R, respectively. Among the cropping systems, GG-M followed by Mz-M system recorded highest MEY and TSGY in both the years. The Mz-M cropping system under PB+R recorded maximum net returns and B:C ratio which was higher by 40.7 and 41.1 compared to traditional F-M cropping system under CT-R, respectively. Thus, CA-based Mz-M/GG-M system should be out scaled in the traditional rainfed mustard based production system to improve the farm production and income on holistic basis to increase the edible oil production in the country.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent beds with residue (PB+R) increased mustard seed yield by 28% relative to conventional tillage without residue (CT-R).

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
permanent beds with residue (PB+R)e1
Outcome
mustard seed yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
28e1
Comparator
conventional tillage without residue (CT-R)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean mustard seed yield increased 28 and 11% under permanent beds with residue (PB+R) and zero tillage with residue (ZT+R) compared to conventional tillage without residue (CT-R), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue (ZT+R) increased mustard seed yield by 11% relative to conventional tillage without residue (CT-R).

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
zero tillage with residue (ZT+R)e1
Outcome
mustard seed yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11%e1
Comparator
conventional tillage without residue (CT-R)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean mustard seed yield increased 28 and 11% under permanent beds with residue (PB+R) and zero tillage with residue (ZT+R) compared to conventional tillage without residue (CT-R), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PB+R increased the seed yield of kharif crops by 37.1% relative to CT-R.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
PB+Re3
Outcome
seed yield of kharif cropse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
37.1e3
Comparator
CT-Re3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e3

“The mean seed yield of kharif crops also increased by 37.1 and 31.7% in the PB+R and ZT+R compared to CT-R, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT+R increased the seed yield of kharif crops by 31.7% relative to CT-R.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
ZT+Re3
Outcome
seed yield of kharif cropse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
31.7%e3
Comparator
CT-Re3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e3

“The mean seed yield of kharif crops also increased by 37.1 and 31.7% in the PB+R and ZT+R compared to CT-R, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize-mustard (Mz-M) cropping system gave significantly higher mustard yield across the years, followed by greengram-mustard (GG-M).

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
maize-mustard (Mz-M) cropping systeme4
Outcome
yield of mustarde4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maize-mustard (Mz-M) cropping system recorded significantly higher yield of mustard across the years followed by greengram-mustard (GG-M) cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PB+R increased mustard equivalent yield (MEY) by 33.4% relative to CT-R.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
PB+Re5
Outcome
mustard equivalent yield (MEY)e5
Direction
increasede5
Value
33.4e5
Comparator
CT-Re5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e5

“The mean mustard equivalent yield (MEY) increased by 33.4 and 24.2% in PB+R and ZT+R over the CT-R, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT+R increased mustard equivalent yield (MEY) by 24.2% relative to CT-R.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
ZT+Re5
Outcome
mustard equivalent yield (MEY)e5
Direction
increasede5
Value
24.2%e5
Comparator
CT-Re5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e5

“The mean mustard equivalent yield (MEY) increased by 33.4 and 24.2% in PB+R and ZT+R over the CT-R, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PB+R increased total system grain yield (TSGY) by 29.6% relative to CT-R.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
PB+Re6
Outcome
total system grain yield (TSGY)e6
Direction
increasede6
Value
29.6e6
Comparator
CT-Re6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e6

“The total system grain yield (TSGY) also increased by 29.6 and 14.7% in the PB+R and ZT+R over the CT-R, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT+R increased total system grain yield (TSGY) by 14.7% relative to CT-R.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
ZT+Re6
Outcome
total system grain yield (TSGY)e6
Direction
increasede6
Value
14.7%e6
Comparator
CT-Re6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e6

“The total system grain yield (TSGY) also increased by 29.6 and 14.7% in the PB+R and ZT+R over the CT-R, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the cropping systems, GG-M followed by Mz-M recorded the highest MEY and TSGY in both years.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
GG-Me7
Outcome
MEY and TSGYe7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among the cropping systems, GG-M followed by Mz-M system recorded highest MEY and TSGY in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mz-M under PB+R gave maximum net returns, higher by 40.7% than the traditional F-M system under CT-R.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Mz-M cropping system under PB+Re2
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
highere2
Value
40.7e2
Comparator
traditional F-M cropping system under CT-Re2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“The Mz-M cropping system under PB+R recorded maximum net returns and B:C ratio which was higher by 40.7 and 41.1 compared to traditional F-M cropping system under CT-R, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–2008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mz-M under PB+R gave a B:C ratio higher by 41.1 than the traditional F-M system under CT-R.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
Mz-M cropping system under PB+Re2
Outcome
B:C ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Value
41.1e2
Comparator
traditional F-M cropping system under CT-Re2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“The Mz-M cropping system under PB+R recorded maximum net returns and B:C ratio which was higher by 40.7 and 41.1 compared to traditional F-M cropping system under CT-R, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1827–2008 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that the CA-based Mz-M/GG-M system be scaled out in the traditional rainfed mustard-based production system.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Outcome
out scaled in the traditional rainfed mustard based production systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thus, CA-based Mz-M/GG-M system should be out scaled in the traditional rainfed mustard based production system to improve the farm production and income on holistic basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2010–2181 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.