Paper · 2018 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Tillage and residue retention effect on crop and water productivity of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under rainfed conditions

PRAVEEN JAKHAR; K S RANA; ANCHAL DASS; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2014-15 and 2015-16 to study the effect of moisture conservation techniques and tillage management practices on growth, productivity and economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with three replications in cropping system mode. The main plot treatments consisted of four moisture conservation practices adopted inkharif season cropviz. ridges and furrows (RF), RF + crop residue (CR) 4 tonnes/ha, RF + CR 2 tonnes/ha + vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM) and flat sowing (FS) and in sub plots;five zero tillage management techniques, viz. zero tillage (ZT), ZT + seed priming, ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha, ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel and conventional tillage (CT) were executed in mustard. Results revealed that moisture conservation technique,RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha in main plot and tillage management practice ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha in sub plot recorded significantly superior growth parameters, physiological indices, yield attributes and yield values over rest of the treatments. Sowing in furrows under RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha recorded highest values for seeds/siliqua and siliqua length to the tune of 13.16 and 4.17 cm, seed yield (2.12 tonnes/ha) and stover yield (7.46 tonnes/ha), respectively. Furthermore under RF +CR 4 tonnes/ha treatment registered significantly higherWUE (21.63 kg/ha/mm) as well as maximumN, P and K uptake values of 102.7, 21.02 and 97.15 kg/ha, respectively. Highest net returns of ` 54100/ha as well as B:C ratio (2.88) were obtained under RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha. In sub-plots, ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha gave significantly higher values of siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua and siliqua length to the tune of 342, 13.18 and 4.05 cm, respectively. ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha recorded maximum seed yield (2.05 tonnes/ha) closely followed by ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel (1.94 tonnes/ha) and both the treatments were statistically at par. Water use efficiency under ZT sowing with CR 4 tonnes/ha and ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel, gave statistically at par values of 20.93 and 19.72 kg/ha/mm, respectively. In spite of higher cost of cultivation, significantly maximum net returns (` 49500/ha) were obtained under ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha. Thus on the basis research findings, it can be established that under rainfed conditions after kharif crop harvest planting of Indian mustard can be done in left over furrows without any tillage with application of ex-situ CR 4 tonnes/ha or with CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel to save time, reduce cost and capitalize of residual moisture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha significantly increased growth parameters and physiological indices of Indian mustard over the other treatments.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF + CR 4 tonnes/hae1
Outcome
growth parameters, physiological indicese1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e1

“moisture conservation technique,RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha in main plot and tillage management practice ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha in sub plot recorded significantly superior growth parameters, physiological indices, yield attributes and yield values over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha significantly increased yield attributes and yield values of Indian mustard over the other treatments.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF + CR 4 tonnes/hae1
Outcome
yield attributes and yield valuese1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e1

“moisture conservation technique,RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha in main plot and tillage management practice ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha in sub plot recorded significantly superior growth parameters, physiological indices, yield attributes and yield values over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in furrows under RF+CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the highest seeds per siliqua (13.16) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF+CR 4 tonnes/hae2
Outcome
seeds/siliquae2
Direction
higheste2
Value
13.16e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sowing in furrows under RF+CR 4 tonnes/ha recorded highest values for seeds/siliqua and siliqua length to the tune of 13.16 and 4.17 cm, seed yield (2.12 tonnes/ha) and stover yield (7.46 tonnes/ha), respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1105–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in furrows under RF+CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the highest siliqua length (4.17 cm) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF+CR 4 tonnes/hae2
Outcome
siliqua lengthe2
Direction
higheste2
Value
4.17 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sowing in furrows under RF+CR 4 tonnes/ha recorded highest values for seeds/siliqua and siliqua length to the tune of 13.16 and 4.17 cm, seed yield (2.12 tonnes/ha) and stover yield (7.46 tonnes/ha), respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1105–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in furrows under RF+CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the highest seed yield (2.12 tonnes/ha) of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF+CR 4 tonnes/hae2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
2.12 tonnes/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sowing in furrows under RF+CR 4 tonnes/ha recorded highest values for seeds/siliqua and siliqua length to the tune of 13.16 and 4.17 cm, seed yield (2.12 tonnes/ha) and stover yield (7.46 tonnes/ha), respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1105–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in furrows under RF+CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the highest stover yield (7.46 tonnes/ha) of Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF+CR 4 tonnes/hae2
Outcome
stover yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
7.46 tonnes/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sowing in furrows under RF+CR 4 tonnes/ha recorded highest values for seeds/siliqua and siliqua length to the tune of 13.16 and 4.17 cm, seed yield (2.12 tonnes/ha) and stover yield (7.46 tonnes/ha), respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1105–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RF +CR 4 tonnes/ha gave significantly higher water use efficiency (21.63 kg/ha/mm) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF +CR 4 tonnes/hae3
Outcome
WUEe3
Direction
highere3
Value
21.63 kg/ha/mme3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e3

“Furthermore under RF +CR 4 tonnes/ha treatment registered significantly higherWUE (21.63 kg/ha/mm) as well as maximumN, P and K uptake values of 102.7, 21.02 and 97.15 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF +CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the maximum N uptake (102.7 kg/ha) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF +CR 4 tonnes/hae3
Outcome
uptakee3
Direction
maximume3
Value
102.7e3
Qualifier
maximumNe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e3

“Furthermore under RF +CR 4 tonnes/ha treatment registered significantly higherWUE (21.63 kg/ha/mm) as well as maximumN, P and K uptake values of 102.7, 21.02 and 97.15 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF +CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the maximum P uptake (21.02 kg/ha) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF +CR 4 tonnes/hae3
Outcome
uptakee3
Direction
maximume3
Value
21.02e3
Qualifier
Pe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e3

“Furthermore under RF +CR 4 tonnes/ha treatment registered significantly higherWUE (21.63 kg/ha/mm) as well as maximumN, P and K uptake values of 102.7, 21.02 and 97.15 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF +CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the maximum K uptake (97.15 kg/ha) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF +CR 4 tonnes/hae3
Outcome
uptakee3
Direction
maximume3
Value
97.15e3
Qualifier
Ke3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e3

“Furthermore under RF +CR 4 tonnes/ha treatment registered significantly higherWUE (21.63 kg/ha/mm) as well as maximumN, P and K uptake values of 102.7, 21.02 and 97.15 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the highest net returns (` 54100/ha) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF + CR 4 tonnes/hae4
Outcome
net returnse4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
54100/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest net returns of ` 54100/ha as well as B:C ratio (2.88) were obtained under RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the highest B:C ratio (2.88) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
RF + CR 4 tonnes/hae4
Outcome
B:C ratioe4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
2.88e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest net returns of ` 54100/ha as well as B:C ratio (2.88) were obtained under RF + CR 4 tonnes/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha significantly increased siliquae per plant (342) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
ZT + CR 4 tonnes/hae5
Outcome
siliquae/plante5
Direction
highere5
Value
342e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e5

“In sub-plots, ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha gave significantly higher values of siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua and siliqua length to the tune of 342, 13.18 and 4.05 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha significantly increased seeds per siliqua (13.18) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
ZT + CR 4 tonnes/hae5
Outcome
seeds/siliquae5
Direction
highere5
Value
13.18e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e5

“In sub-plots, ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha gave significantly higher values of siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua and siliqua length to the tune of 342, 13.18 and 4.05 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha significantly increased siliqua length (4.05 cm) in Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
ZT + CR 4 tonnes/hae5
Outcome
siliqua lengthe5
Direction
highere5
Value
4.05 cme5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e5

“In sub-plots, ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha gave significantly higher values of siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua and siliqua length to the tune of 342, 13.18 and 4.05 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the maximum seed yield (2.05 tonnes/ha) of Indian mustard, statistically at par with ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
ZT + CR 4 tonnes/hae6
Outcome
seed yielde6
Direction
maximume6
Value
2.05 tonnes/hae6
Qualifier
1.94 tonnes/hae6
Comparator
ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogele6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e6

“ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha recorded maximum seed yield (2.05 tonnes/ha) closely followed by ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel (1.94 tonnes/ha) and both the treatments were statistically at par”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1967 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under ZT sowing with CR 4 tonnes/ha, water use efficiency of Indian mustard (20.93) was statistically at par with the other ZT treatment.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
ZT sowing with CR 4 tonnes/hae7
Outcome
Water use efficiencye7
Value
20.93e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e7

“Water use efficiency under ZT sowing with CR 4 tonnes/ha and ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel, gave statistically at par values of 20.93 and 19.72 kg/ha/mm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1969–2136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel, water use efficiency of Indian mustard (19.72) was statistically at par with ZT sowing with CR 4 tonnes/ha.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogele7
Outcome
Water use efficiencye7
Value
19.72e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e7

“Water use efficiency under ZT sowing with CR 4 tonnes/ha and ZT + CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel, gave statistically at par values of 20.93 and 19.72 kg/ha/mm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1969–2136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha gave the maximum net returns (` 49500/ha) of Indian mustard despite higher cultivation cost.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
ZT + CR 4 tonnes/hae1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
49500/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e1

“In spite of higher cost of cultivation, significantly maximum net returns (` 49500/ha) were obtained under ZT + CR 4 tonnes/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2138–2264 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard can be planted in left-over furrows without tillage with ex-situ CR 4 tonnes/ha or CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel to save time, reduce cost and use residual moisture.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
save time, reduce cost and capitalize of residual moisturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of Indian mustard[Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj and Coss.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–258 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thus on the basis research findings, it can be established that under rainfed conditions after kharif crop harvest planting of Indian mustard can be done in left over furrows without any tillage with application of ex-situ CR 4 tonnes/ha or with CR 2 tonnes/ha + Hydrogel to save time, reduce cost and capitalize of residual moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2266–2599 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

organic · physiology: water · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · growth · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

organic · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.