Paper · 2013 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Phytoextractability of Cd from Soil by Some Oilseed Species as Affected by Sewage Sludge and Farmyard Manure

A. K. Indoria; S. R. Poonia; K. L. Sharma

17
claims
36
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted on cadmium (Cd)–enriched (0, 40, 80, 120, 160 mg Cd kg−1 soil, using CdCl2), untreated (Unamended), 3% sewage sludge–treated (SS-amended), and 3% farmyard manure–treated (FYM-amended) soils to evaluate the phytoextractibility of Cd by three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa). Visual observation showed that at or above 40 ppm Cd, some light chlorotic symptoms, resembling iron (Fe) chlorosis, appeared after 2 to 3 weeks of germination. The extent of chlorosis followed the order Eruca sativa > Brassica napus > Brassica juncea, and for amendment treatments Unamended > SS-amended > FYM-amended soils. Both the amendments resulted in an increased biomass production in comparison to the Unamended soil, with the effect being more pronounced for FYM. The dry-matter yield of different plant parts followed the order FYM-amended > SS-amended > Unamended soils. For plant species, it followed the order Brassica juncea > Brassica napus > Eruca sativa. The Cd concentration in different plant parts followed the order leaf > stem > seed in all the three species. Amongst the species, the concentration followed the order Brassica napus > Brassica juncea > Eruca sativa, and for amendment treatments SS-amended > Unamended > FYM-amended soils. The mean Cd uptake by different plant species followed the order Brassica juncea > Brassica napus > Eruca sativa, and for amendment treatments SS-amended soil > Unamended soil > FYM-amended soil. The amounts of exchangeable, carbonate bound, Fe-Mn oxide bound, and organic-matter-bound fractions of Cd in the postharvest soil samples increased with the addition of Cd in soil. However, the residual fraction did not change much. At comparable levels of Cd additions, application of sewage sludge as well as FYM resulted in decreases in the exchangeable and Fe-Mn oxide–bound fractions and an increase in the organic-matter-bound fraction. The beneficial effect of sewage sludge and FYM on biomass production was attributed to (i) improvement in the physicochemical and biological environment of the growth medium, (ii) additional supply of essential nutrients, and (iii) possible decrease in toxic effect of added Cd through organo-metallic complexation reactions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40 ppm Cd or above, plants developed light chlorosis after germination.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
at or above 40 ppm Cde0
Outcome
light chlorotic symptomse0
Qualifier
after 2 to 3 weeks of germinatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at or above 40 ppm Cd, some light chlorotic symptoms, resembling iron (Fe) chlorosis, appeared after 2 to 3 weeks of germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–511 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorosis was greatest in Eruca sativa, then Brassica napus, then Brassica juncea.

Outcome
extent of chlorosise0
Comparator
Brassica napus > Brassica junceae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of chlorosis followed the order Eruca sativa > Brassica napus > Brassica juncea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorosis was greatest in unamended soil, then sludge, then farmyard manure.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
SS-amendede0
Outcome
chlorosise2
Comparator
Unamendede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for amendment treatments Unamended > SS-amended > FYM-amended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–676 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
e2

“The extent of chlorosis followed the order Eruca sativa > Brassica napus > Brassica juncea, and for amendment treatments Unamended > SS-amended > FYM-amended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both amendments increased biomass relative to unamended soil, especially FYM.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
amendmentse0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
more pronounced for FYMe0
Comparator
Unamended soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the amendments resulted in an increased biomass production in comparison to the Unamended soil, with the effect being more pronounced for FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–824 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant-part dry matter yield ranked FYM above SS above unamended soil.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
FYM-amendede0
Outcome
dry-matter yield of different plant partse0
Comparator
Unamended soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry-matter yield of different plant parts followed the order FYM-amended > SS-amended > Unamended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–933 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield ranked Brassica juncea above Brassica napus above Eruca sativa.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae0
Outcome
dry-matter yielde2
Comparator
Brassica napus > Eruca sativae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For plant species, it followed the order Brassica juncea > Brassica napus > Eruca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1023 · show in text ↑
e2

“The dry-matter yield of different plant parts followed the order FYM-amended > SS-amended > Unamended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–933 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd concentration ranked leaf above stem above seed across all species.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Cd concentration in different plant partse0
Comparator
stem > seede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cd concentration in different plant parts followed the order leaf > stem > seed in all the three species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1133 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd concentration ranked Brassica napus above Brassica juncea above Eruca sativa.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
Cd concentratione2
Comparator
Brassica juncea > Eruca sativae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration followed the order Brassica napus > Brassica juncea > Eruca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1240 · show in text ↑
e2

“The Cd concentration in different plant parts followed the order leaf > stem > seed in all the three species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd concentration ranked sludge-amended above unamended above FYM soil.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
SS-amendede0
Outcome
Cd concentratione2
Comparator
Unamended > FYM-amended soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for amendment treatments SS-amended > Unamended > FYM-amended soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1313 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
e2

“The Cd concentration in different plant parts followed the order leaf > stem > seed in all the three species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean Cd uptake ranked Brassica juncea above Brassica napus above Eruca sativa.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae0
Outcome
mean Cd uptakee0
Comparator
Brassica napus > Eruca sativae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean Cd uptake by different plant species followed the order Brassica juncea > Brassica napus > Eruca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd uptake ranked sludge-amended above unamended above FYM soil.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
SS-amended soile0
Outcome
Cd uptakee2
Comparator
Unamended soil > FYM-amended soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for amendment treatments SS-amended soil > Unamended soil > FYM-amended soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1509 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
e2

“The mean Cd uptake by different plant species followed the order Brassica juncea > Brassica napus > Eruca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable, carbonate-bound and Fe-Mn-oxide-bound Cd fractions increased with soil Cd addition.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
addition of Cd in soile0
Outcome
exchangeable, carbonate bound, Fe-Mn oxide bounde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amounts of exchangeable, carbonate bound, Fe-Mn oxide bound, and organic-matter-bound fractions of Cd in the postharvest soil samples increased with the addition of Cd in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1690 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic-matter-bound Cd fraction increased with Cd addition.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
addition of Cd in soile0
Outcome
organic-matter-bound fractions of Cde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic-matter-bound fractions of Cd in the postharvest soil samples increased with the addition of Cd in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1690 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual Cd fraction changed little.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Outcome
residual fractione0
Direction
did not change muche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the residual fraction did not change much”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1742 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge and FYM reduced exchangeable and Fe-Mn oxide-bound Cd fractions.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
sewage sludge as well as FYMe0
Outcome
exchangeable and Fe-Mn oxide–bound fractionse0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sewage sludge as well as FYM resulted in decreases in the exchangeable and Fe-Mn oxide–bound fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1899 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge and FYM increased the organic-matter-bound Cd fraction.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
sewage sludge as well as FYMe2
Outcome
organic-matter-bound fractione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the organic-matter-bound fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–1952 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of sewage sludge as well as FYM resulted in decreases in the exchangeable and Fe-Mn oxide–bound fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1899 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed biomass benefits to improved growth medium, nutrients, and possible Cd complexation.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
sewage sludge and FYMe0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Qualifier
improvement in the physicochemical and biological environment of the growth mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The beneficial effect of sewage sludge and FYM on biomass production was attributed to (i) improvement in the physicochemical and biological environment of the growth medium, (ii) additional supply of essential nutrients, and (iii) possible decrease in toxic effect of added Cd through organo-metallic complexation reactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1954–2278 · show in text ↑
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · disease · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eruca vesicariaPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eruca vesicariaPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

other · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 41 positive, 1 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.