Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sludge and FYM reduced exchangeable and Fe-Mn oxide-bound Cd fractions.

A claim from Phytoextractability of Cd from Soil by Some Oilseed Species as Affected by Sewage Sludge and Farmyard Manure · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge and FYM reduced exchangeable and Fe-Mn oxide-bound Cd fractions.

Taxon
Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativaBrassica junceaBrassica napusEruca vesicaria subsp. sativae3
Treatment
sewage sludge as well as FYMe0
Outcome
exchangeable and Fe-Mn oxide–bound fractionse0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sewage sludge as well as FYM resulted in decreases in the exchangeable and Fe-Mn oxide–bound fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1899
e3

“three oilseed crop species (viz., Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, and Eruca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–350

Title

Phytoextractability of Cd from Soil by Some Oilseed Species as Affected by Sewage Sludge and Farmyard Manure

A. K. Indoria; S. R. Poonia; K. L. Sharma Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2013. doi:10.1080/00103624.2013.847451

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-7fa20de1e293d30ef0699e22f8943c34ab4e2d7b9e58e854daff139f08d5ca82 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

organic · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eruca vesicariaPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.