Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

THE EFFECT OF NITROGEN SOURCES ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SALAD ROCKET GROWN IN DIFFERENT MONTHS OF THE YEAR

Özlem Tuncay; Dursun Eşiyok; Bülent Yağmur; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of months of the year and nitrogen (N) sources on salad rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) yield, quality, and nitrate accumulation was investigated during the years 2002 and 2003. In both years, seeds were sown on the first day of April, May, June, July, August and September. Three different nitrogen sources were used: farmyard (cattle) manure (100 tonnes·ha−1), calcium nitrate [Ca(NO3)2]-15.5% N (150 kg N·ha−1) and ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4)]-21% N (150 kg N·ha−1). Yield, leaf color, dry matter, vitamin C and total glucosinolate content and nitrate accumulation was assessed. Growing months affected all the assessed parameters significantly both years, with the exception of hue angle in 2003, whereas nitrogen source only influenced yield and nitrate accumulation in 2003. In both years the highest yield was obtained in April, but vitamin C and total glucosinolate contents were higher during summer months, and leaves were slightly darker colored. Chemical fertilizers increased the yield compared to farmyard manure; however, they also increased nitrate accumulation slightly, without any significant difference between them. Nitrate accumulation never exceeded 300 mg kg−1 fresh weight (FW), which is well below the acceptable daily intake of 3.7 mg nitrate per kg−1 bodyweight set by European Commission's Scientific Committee on Food.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing months significantly affected all assessed yield, quality and nitrate parameters of salad rocket in both years.

Treatment
Growing monthse1
Outcome
all the assessed parameterse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of months of the year and nitrogen (N) sources on salad rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) yield, quality, and nitrate accumulation was investigated during the years 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–184 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growing months affected all the assessed parameters significantly both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–667 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest salad rocket yield was obtained in April in both years.

Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
obtained in Aprile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of months of the year and nitrogen (N) sources on salad rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) yield, quality, and nitrate accumulation was investigated during the years 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–184 · show in text ↑
e2

“In both years the highest yield was obtained in April, but vitamin C and total glucosinolate contents were higher during summer months, and leaves were slightly darker colored”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–965 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C and total glucosinolate contents of salad rocket were higher during summer months.

Outcome
vitamin C and total glucosinolate contentse2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
during summer monthse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of months of the year and nitrogen (N) sources on salad rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) yield, quality, and nitrate accumulation was investigated during the years 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–184 · show in text ↑
e2

“In both years the highest yield was obtained in April, but vitamin C and total glucosinolate contents were higher during summer months, and leaves were slightly darker colored”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–965 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salad rocket leaves were slightly darker colored in summer months.

Outcome
leavese2
Direction
darker colorede2
Qualifier
slightlye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of months of the year and nitrogen (N) sources on salad rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) yield, quality, and nitrate accumulation was investigated during the years 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–184 · show in text ↑
e2

“In both years the highest yield was obtained in April, but vitamin C and total glucosinolate contents were higher during summer months, and leaves were slightly darker colored”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizers increased salad rocket yield compared with farmyard manure.

Treatment
Chemical fertilizerse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
farmyard manuree3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of months of the year and nitrogen (N) sources on salad rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) yield, quality, and nitrate accumulation was investigated during the years 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–184 · show in text ↑
e3

“Chemical fertilizers increased the yield compared to farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizers slightly increased nitrate accumulation compared with farmyard manure, without a significant difference between them.

Treatment
Chemical fertilizerse3
Outcome
nitrate accumulatione4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
without any significant difference between theme4
Comparator
farmyard manuree3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of months of the year and nitrogen (N) sources on salad rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) yield, quality, and nitrate accumulation was investigated during the years 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–184 · show in text ↑
e3

“Chemical fertilizers increased the yield compared to farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1035 · show in text ↑
e4

“however, they also increased nitrate accumulation slightly, without any significant difference between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate accumulation in salad rocket never exceeded 300 mg kg−1 fresh weight, well below the acceptable daily intake.

Outcome
Nitrate accumulatione5
Direction
lowerinferrede5
Value
300 mg kg−1 fresh weight (FW)e5
Qualifier
well below the acceptable daily intakee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of months of the year and nitrogen (N) sources on salad rocket (Eruca sativa Mill.) yield, quality, and nitrate accumulation was investigated during the years 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–184 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nitrate accumulation never exceeded 300 mg kg−1 fresh weight (FW), which is well below the acceptable daily intake of 3.7 mg nitrate per kg−1 bodyweight set by European Commission's Scientific Committee on Food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1356 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eruca vesicariaPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eruca vesicariaPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.