Paper · 2023 · Agrochemicals

Quick In Situ Evaluation of Herbicide Efficacy in Maize (Zea mays L.) Crop

Anastasia Tsekoura; Ioannis Gazoulis; Nikolaos Antonopoulos; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sustainable crop and weed management is among the crucial challenges in the era of the EU Green Deal. The main objective of the present study was to apply an innovative approach for the rapid assessment of herbicide efficacy in maize (Zea mays) crop in four different trials during two years. Weed NDVI values were recorded at two weeks after treatment, while weed biomass and crop yield were also measured. The results revealed significant differences between the several treatments. In many cases, significant effects of herbicide application on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values and weed biomass were noticed at two weeks after treatment. Moreover, the mixture nicosulfuron + rimsulfuron + mesotrione resulted in high efficacy on the crop yield of all fields. Consequently, our approach can allow for an early prediction of the real field efficacy of several herbicides and thus act as an alert for the farmers in order to choose the most efficient herbicide, avoid applications of low efficacy and reduce the herbicide inputs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments differed significantly in the maize trials.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
differences between the several treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed significant differences between the several treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application significantly affected weed NDVI two weeks after treatment in many cases.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) valuese0
Qualifier
at two weeks after treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In many cases, significant effects of herbicide application on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values and weed biomass were noticed at two weeks after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application significantly affected weed biomass two weeks after treatment in many cases.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Qualifier
at two weeks after treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In many cases, significant effects of herbicide application on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values and weed biomass were noticed at two weeks after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron and mesotrione mixture had high efficacy on maize yield in all fields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
nicosulfuron + rimsulfuron + mesotrionee0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
all fieldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixture nicosulfuron + rimsulfuron + mesotrione resulted in high efficacy on the crop yield of all fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–249 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early weed NDVI assessment can predict field efficacy of herbicides in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
early prediction of the real field efficacy of several herbicidese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our approach can allow for an early prediction of the real field efficacy of several herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–895 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed NDVI values were recorded at two weeks after treatment”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 293–352 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize (Zea mays) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–249 · show in text ↑

mesotrione · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

59 papers: 40 positive, 19 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

rimsulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.