Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Agronomy

Soil Properties, Crop Yield, and Economic Return in Response to Lime Application on Acidic Nitisols of Southern Highlands of Ethiopia

Getahun Haile; Habtamu Berihun; Helina Abera; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil acidity is one of the major crop production constraints in the highlands of Ethiopia. Liming is becoming a common practice to amend soil acidity, but its effects on soil properties, crop yield, and farm income are not well studied. In this study, an on-farm liming experiment was conducted for two consecutive years (2020-2021) on acidic Nitisols (pH < 5.5) in Southern Ethiopia. The experiment consisted of six liming rates (control, 2.74, 4.11, 5.48, 6.85, and 8.22 t·ha−1) laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Soil, agronomic, and economic data were collected in 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons and analyzed. The application of lime in the ranges of 2.74–8.22 t·ha−1 increased soil pH by 0.46–1.25 units and reduced exchangeable acidity by 2.02–3.17 units. Higher lime rates of 6.85–8.22 t·ha−1 increased soil pH sharply from 5.22 to 5.99 and 6.46, respectively, but such a rise in soil pH was not proportionally reflected in the yield increment. Higher available phosphorus contents of 7.16 and 6.01 mg·kg−1 were measured at the liming rates of 4.11 and 5.48 t·ha−1, respectively. Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively. It also yielded the highest marginal rate of return of 477% and a gross margin of 192,857.3 ETB1·ha−1, which is 53% higher than the control. Based on our results, 5.45 t·ha−1 of lime appears to have the optimal rate for economically viable barley production in the study area or similar environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application in the range 2.74–8.22 t·ha−1 increased soil pH by 0.46–1.25 units.

Treatment
application of lime in the ranges of 2.74–8.22 t·ha−1e2
Outcome
soil pHe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
0.46–1.25 unitse2
Setting
Southern Ethiopiae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an on-farm liming experiment was conducted for two consecutive years (2020-2021) on acidic Nitisols (pH < 5.5) in Southern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–383 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of lime in the ranges of 2.74–8.22 t·ha−1 increased soil pH by 0.46–1.25 units and reduced exchangeable acidity by 2.02–3.17 units”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–797 · show in text ↑
e5

“Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application reduced exchangeable acidity by 2.02–3.17 units.

Treatment
application of lime in the ranges of 2.74–8.22 t·ha−1e2
Outcome
exchangeable aciditye2
Direction
reducede2
Value
2.02–3.17 unitse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The application of lime in the ranges of 2.74–8.22 t·ha−1 increased soil pH by 0.46–1.25 units and reduced exchangeable acidity by 2.02–3.17 units”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–797 · show in text ↑
e5

“Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher lime rates of 6.85–8.22 t·ha−1 increased soil pH sharply, from 5.22 to 5.99 and 6.46.

Treatment
Higher lime rates of 6.85–8.22 t·ha−1e3
Outcome
soil pHe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
from 5.22 to 5.99 and 6.46e3
Qualifier
sharplye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Higher lime rates of 6.85–8.22 t·ha−1 increased soil pH sharply from 5.22 to 5.99 and 6.46, respectively, but such a rise in soil pH was not proportionally reflected in the yield increment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–987 · show in text ↑
e5

“Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rise in soil pH at higher lime rates was not proportionally reflected in the yield increment.

Treatment
Higher lime rates of 6.85–8.22 t·ha−1e3
Outcome
yield incremente3
Direction
not proportionally reflected ine3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Higher lime rates of 6.85–8.22 t·ha−1 increased soil pH sharply from 5.22 to 5.99 and 6.46, respectively, but such a rise in soil pH was not proportionally reflected in the yield increment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–987 · show in text ↑
e5

“Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 4.11 and 5.48 t·ha−1 gave higher available phosphorus contents, 7.16 and 6.01 mg·kg−1.

Treatment
liming rates of 4.11 and 5.48 t·ha−1e4
Outcome
available phosphorus contentse4
Direction
Highere4
Value
7.16 and 6.01 mg·kg−1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Higher available phosphorus contents of 7.16 and 6.01 mg·kg−1 were measured at the liming rates of 4.11 and 5.48 t·ha−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1122 · show in text ↑
e5

“Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 5.45 t·ha−1 yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1, higher than the control.

Treatment
5.45 t·ha−1 lime applicatione5
Outcome
barley total biomasse5
Direction
higheste5
Value
19,199 kg·ha−1e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 5.45 t·ha−1 gave a higher barley grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1 than the control.

Treatment
5.45 t·ha−1 lime applicatione5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
4,328 kg·ha−1e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 5.45 t·ha−1 gave the highest marginal rate of return, 477%.

Treatment
5.45 t·ha−1 lime applicatione5
Outcome
marginal rate of returne6
Direction
higheste6
Value
477%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1345 · show in text ↑
e6

“It also yielded the highest marginal rate of return of 477% and a gross margin of 192,857.3 ETB1·ha−1, which is 53% higher than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 5.45 t·ha−1 gave a gross margin of 192,857.3 ETB1·ha−1, 53% higher than the control.

Treatment
5.45 t·ha−1 lime applicatione5
Outcome
gross margine6
Direction
highere6
Value
192,857.3 ETB1·ha−1e6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Combined over the two years, 5.45 t·ha−1 lime application yielded the highest barley total biomass of 19,199 kg·ha−1 and a grain yield of 4,328 kg·ha−1, which are 46% and 30% higher than those of the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1345 · show in text ↑
e6

“It also yielded the highest marginal rate of return of 477% and a gross margin of 192,857.3 ETB1·ha−1, which is 53% higher than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Lime at 5.45 t·ha−1 appears to be the optimal rate for economically viable barley production in the study area or similar environments.

Outcome
optimal rate for economically viable barley productione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“5.45 t·ha−1 of lime appears to have the optimal rate for economically viable barley production in the study area or similar environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1646 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

54 papers: 53 positive, 1 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

lime · quality: sugar starch · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

lime · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.