Paper · 2023 · Naukovì dopovìdì Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu bìoresursiv ì prirodokoristuvannâ Ukraïni

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF AGROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES UNDER DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGIES OF SOIL PROCESSING IN CROP ROTATION

M. V. Voitovyk; O. B. Panchenko; I. D. Prymak; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

World and domestic experience in the use of technologies has led to the need to revise approaches to soil cultivation, directions are primarily concerned with its minimization. The purpose of the research is to compare and substantiate the impact of different tillage technologies in a three-field crop rotation on the physical properties of typical chernozem. Applied materials and methods research results in a field experiment, analysis, generalization and statistical processing of data from stock and modern literary materials. The results of the study of the application of soil tillage technologies on the density and hardness of the soil, the productivity of soybeans of the central forest-steppe of Ukraine are presented. It was established that the density of the soil under "No-till" technology and minimal tillage leads to an increase in the density of the soil compared to plowing. Its increase occurred most in the 20-30 cm layer of typical chernozem with minimal tillage. Replacing the shelf with zero and minimal tillage increased soil resistance. The hardness in the soil laver 0-30 cm after disk tillage was higher than plowing by 5.5 kg/cm2, after "No-till" technology – by 8.2 kg/cm2. Soybean productivity with soil discing decreased by 5.4% compared to plowing. According to the "No-till" technology and plowing the yield of soybean grain was obtained at the same level, which is 2,19 and t/ha, respectively. A promising direction for further research is the study of the structural and aggregate composition and reserves of available moisture in the meter-thick soil laver.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till technology increased soil density compared with plowing.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
No-tille1
Outcome
density of the soile1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
plowinge1
Setting
central forest-steppe of Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of soybeans of the central forest-steppe of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–715 · show in text ↑
e1

“the density of the soil under "No-till" technology and minimal tillage leads to an increase in the density of the soil compared to plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimal tillage increased soil density compared with plowing.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
minimal tillagee1
Outcome
density of the soile1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
plowinge1
Setting
central forest-steppe of Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of soybeans of the central forest-steppe of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–715 · show in text ↑
e1

“the density of the soil under "No-till" technology and minimal tillage leads to an increase in the density of the soil compared to plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in soil density was greatest in the 20-30 cm layer under minimal tillage.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
minimal tillagee2
Outcome
Its increasee2
Direction
occurred moste2
Qualifier
20-30 cm layer of typical chernozeme2
Setting
central forest-steppe of Ukrainee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of soybeans of the central forest-steppe of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–715 · show in text ↑
e2

“Its increase occurred most in the 20-30 cm layer of typical chernozem with minimal tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing the shelf with zero and minimal tillage increased soil resistance.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
zero and minimal tillagee3
Outcome
soil resistancee3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
shelfe3
Setting
central forest-steppe of Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of soybeans of the central forest-steppe of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–715 · show in text ↑
e3

“Replacing the shelf with zero and minimal tillage increased soil resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardness of the 0-30 cm soil layer after disk tillage was higher than under plowing by 5.5 kg/cm2.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
disk tillagee4
Outcome
hardnesse4
Direction
highere4
Value
5.5 kg/cm2e4
Qualifier
soil laver 0-30 cme4
Comparator
plowinge4
Setting
central forest-steppe of Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of soybeans of the central forest-steppe of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–715 · show in text ↑
e4

“The hardness in the soil laver 0-30 cm after disk tillage was higher than plowing by 5.5 kg/cm2, after "No-till" technology – by 8.2 kg/cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardness of the 0-30 cm soil layer under No-till technology was higher than under plowing by 8.2 kg/cm2.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
No-tille4
Outcome
hardnesse4
Direction
highere4
Value
8.2 kg/cm2e4
Qualifier
soil laver 0-30 cme4
Comparator
plowinge4
Setting
central forest-steppe of Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of soybeans of the central forest-steppe of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–715 · show in text ↑
e4

“The hardness in the soil laver 0-30 cm after disk tillage was higher than plowing by 5.5 kg/cm2, after "No-till" technology – by 8.2 kg/cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean productivity decreased by 5.4% with soil discing compared with plowing.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soil discinge5
Outcome
Soybean productivitye5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
5.4%e5
Comparator
plowinge5
Setting
central forest-steppe of Ukrainee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity of soybeans of the central forest-steppe of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–715 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soybean productivity with soil discing decreased by 5.4% compared to plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean grain yield under No-till technology was at the same level as under plowing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
No-tille6
Outcome
yield of soybean graine6
Direction
at the same levele6
Value
2,19 and t/hae6
Comparator
plowinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“According to the "No-till" technology and plowing the yield of soybean grain was obtained at the same level, which is 2,19 and t/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1428 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.