Abstract
In this paper, the effects of maize and its three intercropping plants, sweet potato, soybean and peanut, on the growth and development of FAW, feeding preference of larvae, olfactory response and oviposition preference of adults were studied in the laboratory. The results showed that maize and peanut were suitable for the survival and development of FAW, while sweet potato and soybean were not suitable for multigenerational reproduction. The larvae significantly preferred to feed on maize compared to the other three plants. The olfactory response test indicated that soybean showed a strong deterrent effect against FAW adults. Furthermore, the intercropping plants reduced the host selection rate of adults compared to maize alone. In two-choice tests of the maize vs. the intercropping plants, the female adult preferred to oviposit and lay more eggs on maize rather than on the intercropping plants. The intercropping plants significantly reduced the oviposition selection of FAW adults when the combination (maize + intercropping plant), especially soybean and sweet potato, was compared to maize alone. These may be the reasons for why the maize-soybean intercropping system reduced FAW damage in the field. We also speculated that the maize-sweet potato system may also reduce the FAW damage. This study provided a theoretical basis for the comprehensive management of FAW by utilizing an intercropping system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Maize supported fall armyworm survival and development.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maize and peanut were suitable for the survival and development of FAW”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut supported fall armyworm survival and development.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Interactor
- FAWe0pest
- Outcome
- survival and development of FAWe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maize and peanut were suitable for the survival and development of FAW”
Claim · model-written summary
Sweet potato was unsuitable for multigenerational fall armyworm reproduction.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatase0 - Interactor
- Fall Armyworm
Spodoptera frugiperdat0pest - Outcome
- multigenerational reproductione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“sweet potato and soybean were not suitable for multigenerational reproduction”
t0“Fall Armyworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean was unsuitable for multigenerational fall armyworm reproduction.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Interactor
- Fall Armyworm
Spodoptera frugiperdat0pest - Outcome
- multigenerational reproductione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“sweet potato and soybean were not suitable for multigenerational reproduction”
t0“Fall Armyworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Larvae significantly preferred maize over the other three plants.
- Interactor
- Fall Armyworm
Spodoptera frugiperdat0pest - Outcome
- larvae significantly preferred to feed on maizee0
- Direction
- preferrede0
- Comparator
- the other three plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The larvae significantly preferred to feed on maize compared to the other three plants.”
t0“Fall Armyworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean strongly deterred adult fall armyworms in olfactory tests.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Interactor
- FAWe0pest
- Outcome
- strong deterrent effect against FAW adultse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“soybean showed a strong deterrent effect against FAW adults”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping plants reduced adult host selection relative to maize alone.
- Treatment
- intercropping plantse0
- Interactor
- Fall Armyworm
Spodoptera frugiperdat0pest - Outcome
- host selection rate of adultse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- maize alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the intercropping plants reduced the host selection rate of adults compared to maize alone”
t0“Fall Armyworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Females preferred to oviposit on maize rather than intercropping plants.
- Interactor
- Fall Armyworm
Spodoptera frugiperdat0pest - Outcome
- oviposite0
- Direction
- preferrede0
- Comparator
- intercropping plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the female adult preferred to oviposit and lay more eggs on maize rather than on the intercropping plants”
t0“Fall Armyworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Females laid more eggs on maize than intercropping plants.
- Interactor
- Fall Armyworm
Spodoptera frugiperdat0pest - Outcome
- eggse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- intercropping plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the female adult preferred to oviposit and lay more eggs on maize rather than on the intercropping plants”
t0“Fall Armyworm”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping plants significantly reduced adult oviposition selection versus maize alone.
- Treatment
- maize + intercropping plante0
- Interactor
- FAWe0pest
- Outcome
- oviposition selection of FAW adultse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- maize alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The intercropping plants significantly reduced the oviposition selection of FAW adults when the combination (maize + intercropping plant), especially soybean and sweet potato, was compared to maize alone.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest maize-soybean intercropping reduced field fall armyworm damage.
- Treatment
- maize-soybean intercropping systeme0
- Interactor
- FAWe0pest
- Outcome
- FAW damagee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the maize-soybean intercropping system reduced FAW damage in the field”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors speculate maize-sweet potato intercropping may reduce fall armyworm damage.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the maize-sweet potato system may also reduce the FAW damage”
The same questions in other papers
Solanum tuberosum · pest · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →intercropping · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.