Paper · 2021 · Pest Management Science

Intercropped Bt and non‐Bt corn with ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis) as a tool to resistance management of Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Filipe L Jacques; Paulo E Degrande; Evandro Gauer; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Corn intercropped with ruzigrass is common in Brazil, and it can improve the physicochemical features of soils, increase water retention, and suppress the emergence of resistant weeds and soil nematodes. As both corn and ruzigrass are hosts to Spodoptera frugiperda (the main corn pest in South America), the cultivation of both these plants in the same place at one time motivates investigation into the pest population dynamics. We hypothesize that the intercropping system influences S. frugiperda pressure and leaf injury in corn. Considering that if corn hybrids with high dose toxin expression are used, ruzigrass may be a potential host to susceptible S. frugiperda larvae, consequently an alternative refuge and be included as a tool for the resistant management of Bt corn. To test these hypotheses about the use of ruzigrass as an alternative host of S. frugiperda in an intercropping system with corn, we conducted field trials in three seasons to verify S. frugiperda population dynamics and leaf injury to crop systems. In addition to phenotypic evaluation, we also characterized molecularly S. frugiperda strains collected in corn and ruzigrass to identify strain differences. RESULTS: The insects collected in both corn and ruzigrass were identified as corn strains. Ruzigrass was used as a S. frugiperda host during all crop cycles. The intercropped system did not increase the S. frugiperda population or leaf injury on Bt corn. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the intercropped system is not prejudicial to Bt corn cultivation since high dose concept applies to all larvae instars. The results also suggest that ruzigrass may be used as a promising alternative refuge in Bt corn agroecosystems, if compliance with management strategies is followed. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insects collected from corn and ruzigrass were identified as corn strains.

Interactor
insectsInsectae0pest
Outcome
corn strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The insects collected in both corn and ruzigrass were identified as corn strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ruzigrass hosted S. frugiperda during all crop cycles.

Taxon
Ruzigrasse0
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
S. frugiperda hoste0
Qualifier
all crop cyclese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ruzigrass was used as a S. frugiperda host during all crop cycles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not increase the S. frugiperda population on Bt corn.

Taxon
Bt corne0
Treatment
intercropped systeme0
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
S. frugiperda populatione0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropped system did not increase the S. frugiperda population or leaf injury on Bt corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not increase leaf injury on Bt corn.

Taxon
Bt corne0
Treatment
intercropped systeme0
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
leaf injurye0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropped system did not increase the S. frugiperda population or leaf injury on Bt corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1457 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest ruzigrass as a potential alternative refuge in Bt corn agroecosystems if management strategies are followed.

Taxon
Bt corne0
Outcome
ruzigrass may be used as a promising alternative refugee0
Qualifier
if compliance with management strategies is followede0

Verbatim

e0

“ruzigrass may be used as a promising alternative refuge in Bt corn agroecosystems, if compliance with management strategies is followed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1782 · show in text ↑

intercropping · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.