Abstract
In Feb 2022, land preparation for the field site began with 500 lbs of 10-10-10 (per acre) fertilizer incorporated into Tift pebbly clay loam 6-foot beds, which were then covered with white plastic mulch. On 20 Jun, tomato plants, hybrid ‘Longboat’ (TYLCV resistant), were transplanted in a single row and maintained with standard cultural practices at the Lang-Rigdon Farm, Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station in Tifton, GA. Treatment plots were measured to 60 ft in length and replicated 4 times with all tomato plants staked and tied. The fungicide Manzate (mancozeb) was sprayed over the top, while Ridomil Gold (mefenoxam) was injected into the drip system to reduce foliar disease. Drip irrigation occurred weekly with 30 gal/acre of 7-0-7 liquid fertilizer injected every other week. Weekly pest scouting commenced on 8 Jul using a 30-s inspection per plant method across 10 whole plants per plot. Leaf samples for whitefly adults were counted from 3 leaves (one per plant, 3–6 leaf nodes) for 10 plants per plot using the leaf turn technique. An insecticide application of 53 gallons/acre spray volume, using 5 TX 18 nozzles per row and 2.5-gallon mixture per treatment for sprays, occurred on each of these days, 3, 10, 23, 30 Aug, and 6, 13 Sep, throughout the test period. The spray injection rig was done at 25 psi for 7 min and a 30-min wash in-between injections. Only a single harvest damage rating on 27 Sep was recorded. Lepidopteran feeding, the most significant damage category recorded, caused damage directly or indirectly. Thus, we only divided the USDA standard tomato sizes into “clean” (non-lepidopteran damage) and lepidopteran-damaged fruit. The yield and scout data were analyzed using GLM and LSD tests mean separation (SAS Institute 1990). Beet armyworms and tobacco hornworms were mainly detected during this test (38% and 26%, respectively, of the Lepidoptera larvae overall). Overall, the incidence of beet armyworm and tobacco hornworm was 0.7 larvae per 10 plant samples, well above the previously published treatment threshold of 1 larva per 40 plants in Georgia tomato. There were significant treatment effects on overall lepidopteran larvae (Table 1), but no significant separation in individual treatments. No significant differences were detected between the various treatments with and without the adjuvant Silwet. Proclaim 5SG (emamectin benzoate) 2.8 oz/a + Silwet 0.1% v/v alone performed marginally better vs. the no adjuvant counterpart over all sample dates (Table 1, last column). Across all sample dates, the lepidopteran larval count was lower in all treatments, i.e., Proclaim, Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Radiant (spinetoram), compared with the check; however, the only significant effect on tomato yield was that the Radiant treatment yielded more clean fruit and overall fruit weight than the check (Table 2).1 aTobacco hornworm. b Means within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly different (LSD, P < 0.05), but superscript “m” with a marginal treatment effect (P = 0.06). cFluid ounce/acre (fl oz/acre). aMeans within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly different (LSD, P < 0.05). bFluid ounce/acre (fl oz/acre).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Beet armyworms comprised 38% of detected lepidopteran larvae.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Interactor
- Beet armyworms
Spodoptera exiguae0pest - Outcome
- Beet armywormse0
- Value
- 38%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Beet armyworms and tobacco hornworms were mainly detected during this test (38% and 26%, respectively, of the Lepidoptera larvae overall).”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tobacco hornworms comprised 26% of lepidopteran larvae.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Interactor
- tobacco hornworms
Manduca sextae0pest - Outcome
- tobacco hornwormse0
- Value
- 26%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Beet armyworms and tobacco hornworms were mainly detected during this test (38% and 26%, respectively, of the Lepidoptera larvae overall).”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined beet armyworm and tobacco hornworm incidence was 0.7 larvae per 10 plant samples, above the Georgia tomato threshold.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Interactor
- beet armyworm
Spodoptera exiguae0pest - Outcome
- incidence of beet armyworm and tobacco hornworme0
- Direction
- well abovee0
- Value
- 0.7 larvae per 10 plant samplese0
- Comparator
- previously published treatment thresholde0
- Setting
- Georgiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the incidence of beet armyworm and tobacco hornworm was 0.7 larvae per 10 plant samples, well above the previously published treatment threshold of 1 larva per 40 plants in Georgia tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments had a significant overall effect on lepidopteran larvae, but individual treatments did not separate significantly.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- treatmente0
- Outcome
- overall lepidopteran larvaee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“There were significant treatment effects on overall lepidopteran larvae (Table 1), but no significant separation in individual treatments.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding Silwet made no significant difference among treatments.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- adjuvant Silwete0
- Outcome
- significant differencese0
- Comparator
- without the adjuvant Silwete0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“No significant differences were detected between the various treatments with and without the adjuvant Silwet.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Proclaim 5SG with Silwet performed marginally better than Proclaim without Silwet.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Proclaim 5SG (emamectin benzoate) 2.8 oz/a + Silwet 0.1% v/ve0
- Outcome
- performed marginally bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- over all sample datese0
- Comparator
- no adjuvant counterparte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Proclaim 5SG (emamectin benzoate) 2.8 oz/a + Silwet 0.1% v/v alone performed marginally better vs. the no adjuvant counterpart over all sample dates”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Proclaim lowered lepidopteran larval counts compared with the check.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Proclaime0
- Outcome
- lepidopteran larval counte0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- the checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the lepidopteran larval count was lower in all treatments, i.e., Proclaim, Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Radiant (spinetoram), compared with the check”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Coragen lowered lepidopteran larval counts compared with the check.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Coragen (chlorantraniliprole)e0
- Outcome
- lepidopteran larval counte0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- the checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the lepidopteran larval count was lower in all treatments, i.e., Proclaim, Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Radiant (spinetoram), compared with the check”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Radiant lowered lepidopteran larval counts compared with the check.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Radiant (spinetoram)e0
- Outcome
- lepidopteran larval counte0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- the checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the lepidopteran larval count was lower in all treatments, i.e., Proclaim, Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Radiant (spinetoram), compared with the check”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Radiant yielded more clean fruit than the check.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Radiante0
- Outcome
- clean fruite0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- the checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the Radiant treatment yielded more clean fruit and overall fruit weight than the check”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Radiant yielded more overall fruit weight than the check.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Radiante0
- Outcome
- overall fruit weighte0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- the checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the Radiant treatment yielded more clean fruit and overall fruit weight than the check”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Spinetoram · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
emamectin benzoate · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.