Paper · 2024 · Arthropod management tests

Foliar insecticide treatments in tomato for lepidoptera larvae control, 2022

Jermaine D Perier; Charles L Gruver; David G Riley

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In Feb 2022, land preparation for the field site began with 500 lbs of 10-10-10 (per acre) fertilizer incorporated into Tift pebbly clay loam 6-foot beds, which were then covered with white plastic mulch. On 20 Jun, tomato plants, hybrid ‘Longboat’ (TYLCV resistant), were transplanted in a single row and maintained with standard cultural practices at the Lang-Rigdon Farm, Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station in Tifton, GA. Treatment plots were measured to 60 ft in length and replicated 4 times with all tomato plants staked and tied. The fungicide Manzate (mancozeb) was sprayed over the top, while Ridomil Gold (mefenoxam) was injected into the drip system to reduce foliar disease. Drip irrigation occurred weekly with 30 gal/acre of 7-0-7 liquid fertilizer injected every other week. Weekly pest scouting commenced on 8 Jul using a 30-s inspection per plant method across 10 whole plants per plot. Leaf samples for whitefly adults were counted from 3 leaves (one per plant, 3–6 leaf nodes) for 10 plants per plot using the leaf turn technique. An insecticide application of 53 gallons/acre spray volume, using 5 TX 18 nozzles per row and 2.5-gallon mixture per treatment for sprays, occurred on each of these days, 3, 10, 23, 30 Aug, and 6, 13 Sep, throughout the test period. The spray injection rig was done at 25 psi for 7 min and a 30-min wash in-between injections. Only a single harvest damage rating on 27 Sep was recorded. Lepidopteran feeding, the most significant damage category recorded, caused damage directly or indirectly. Thus, we only divided the USDA standard tomato sizes into “clean” (non-lepidopteran damage) and lepidopteran-damaged fruit. The yield and scout data were analyzed using GLM and LSD tests mean separation (SAS Institute 1990). Beet armyworms and tobacco hornworms were mainly detected during this test (38% and 26%, respectively, of the Lepidoptera larvae overall). Overall, the incidence of beet armyworm and tobacco hornworm was 0.7 larvae per 10 plant samples, well above the previously published treatment threshold of 1 larva per 40 plants in Georgia tomato. There were significant treatment effects on overall lepidopteran larvae (Table 1), but no significant separation in individual treatments. No significant differences were detected between the various treatments with and without the adjuvant Silwet. Proclaim 5SG (emamectin benzoate) 2.8 oz/a + Silwet 0.1% v/v alone performed marginally better vs. the no adjuvant counterpart over all sample dates (Table 1, last column). Across all sample dates, the lepidopteran larval count was lower in all treatments, i.e., Proclaim, Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Radiant (spinetoram), compared with the check; however, the only significant effect on tomato yield was that the Radiant treatment yielded more clean fruit and overall fruit weight than the check (Table 2).1 aTobacco hornworm. b Means within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly different (LSD, P < 0.05), but superscript “m” with a marginal treatment effect (P = 0.06). cFluid ounce/acre (fl oz/acre). aMeans within columns followed by a common letter are not significantly different (LSD, P < 0.05). bFluid ounce/acre (fl oz/acre).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beet armyworms comprised 38% of detected lepidopteran larvae.

Interactor
Beet armywormsSpodoptera exiguae0pest
Outcome
Beet armywormse0
Value
38%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera exigua
Spodoptera exigua · InteractorDumi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beet armyworms and tobacco hornworms were mainly detected during this test (38% and 26%, respectively, of the Lepidoptera larvae overall).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1913 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco hornworms comprised 26% of lepidopteran larvae.

Interactor
tobacco hornwormsManduca sextae0pest
Outcome
tobacco hornwormse0
Value
26%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Manduca sexta
Manduca sexta · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beet armyworms and tobacco hornworms were mainly detected during this test (38% and 26%, respectively, of the Lepidoptera larvae overall).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1913 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined beet armyworm and tobacco hornworm incidence was 0.7 larvae per 10 plant samples, above the Georgia tomato threshold.

Interactor
beet armywormSpodoptera exiguae0pest
Outcome
incidence of beet armyworm and tobacco hornworme0
Direction
well abovee0
Value
0.7 larvae per 10 plant samplese0
Comparator
previously published treatment thresholde0
Setting
Georgiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera exigua
Spodoptera exigua · InteractorDumi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the incidence of beet armyworm and tobacco hornworm was 0.7 larvae per 10 plant samples, well above the previously published treatment threshold of 1 larva per 40 plants in Georgia tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1923–2110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments had a significant overall effect on lepidopteran larvae, but individual treatments did not separate significantly.

Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
overall lepidopteran larvaee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant treatment effects on overall lepidopteran larvae (Table 1), but no significant separation in individual treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2112–2250 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Silwet made no significant difference among treatments.

Treatment
adjuvant Silwete0
Outcome
significant differencese0
Comparator
without the adjuvant Silwete0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were detected between the various treatments with and without the adjuvant Silwet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2251–2360 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proclaim 5SG with Silwet performed marginally better than Proclaim without Silwet.

Treatment
Proclaim 5SG (emamectin benzoate) 2.8 oz/a + Silwet 0.1% v/ve0
Outcome
performed marginally bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
over all sample datese0
Comparator
no adjuvant counterparte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proclaim 5SG (emamectin benzoate) 2.8 oz/a + Silwet 0.1% v/v alone performed marginally better vs. the no adjuvant counterpart over all sample dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2361–2509 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proclaim lowered lepidopteran larval counts compared with the check.

Treatment
Proclaime0
Outcome
lepidopteran larval counte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lepidopteran larval count was lower in all treatments, i.e., Proclaim, Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Radiant (spinetoram), compared with the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2559–2714 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coragen lowered lepidopteran larval counts compared with the check.

Treatment
Coragen (chlorantraniliprole)e0
Outcome
lepidopteran larval counte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lepidopteran larval count was lower in all treatments, i.e., Proclaim, Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Radiant (spinetoram), compared with the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2559–2714 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiant lowered lepidopteran larval counts compared with the check.

Treatment
Radiant (spinetoram)e0
Outcome
lepidopteran larval counte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lepidopteran larval count was lower in all treatments, i.e., Proclaim, Coragen (chlorantraniliprole), and Radiant (spinetoram), compared with the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2559–2714 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiant yielded more clean fruit than the check.

Treatment
Radiante0
Outcome
clean fruite0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Radiant treatment yielded more clean fruit and overall fruit weight than the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2778–2864 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiant yielded more overall fruit weight than the check.

Treatment
Radiante0
Outcome
overall fruit weighte0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Radiant treatment yielded more clean fruit and overall fruit weight than the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2778–2864 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Spinetoram · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

emamectin benzoate · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.