Abstract
Studies on the field efficacy of insecticide mixture chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC against major pest of tomato viz., Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Spodoptera litura (F.), Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) and Tetranychus urticae (Koch) were carried out during 2011 and 2012. This mixture at 60, 36 and 30 g a.i. ha−1 was superior in reducing the fruit damage which was in the range of 95.41 to 92.43% in first season after two rounds of spraying and 96.57 to 95.02% in second season after three rounds of spraying. It also better than the checks viz., chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC at 30 g a.i. ha−1, abamectin 1.9 EC at 15 g a.i. ha−1 and lamda cyhalothrin 4.9 CS at 15 g a.i. ha−1. Chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC mixture 100% reduction of S. litura to an extent of 48.66–78.28% reduction of leaf miner damage and 89.73–99.36% reduction in leaf miner population. In T. urticae population Chlorantraniliprole + abamectin did not cause any phytotoxicity symptoms.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture reduced tomato fruit damage by 95.41 to 92.43% in the first season.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- This mixture at 60, 36 and 30 g a.i. ha−1e0
- Outcome
- fruit damagee0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 95.41 to 92.43%e0
- Qualifier
- first season after two rounds of sprayinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This mixture at 60, 36 and 30 g a.i. ha−1 was superior in reducing the fruit damage which was in the range of 95.41 to 92.43% in first season after two rounds of spraying and 96.57 to 95.02% in second season after three rounds of spraying.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture reduced tomato fruit damage by 96.57 to 95.02% in the second season.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- This mixture at 60, 36 and 30 g a.i. ha−1e0
- Outcome
- fruit damagee0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 96.57 to 95.02%e0
- Qualifier
- second season after three rounds of sprayinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This mixture at 60, 36 and 30 g a.i. ha−1 was superior in reducing the fruit damage which was in the range of 95.41 to 92.43% in first season after two rounds of spraying and 96.57 to 95.02% in second season after three rounds of spraying.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture was better than the tested insecticide checks.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SCt1
- Outcome
- better than the checkse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It also better than the checks viz., chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC at 30 g a.i. ha−1, abamectin 1.9 EC at 15 g a.i. ha−1 and lamda cyhalothrin 4.9 CS at 15 g a.i. ha−1.”
t0“tomato”
t1“chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture reported complete reduction of S. litura.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC mixturee0
- Interactor
- S. litura
Spodoptera liturae0pest - Outcome
- reduction of S. liturae0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 100%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC mixture 100% reduction of S. litura to an extent of 48.66–78.28% reduction of leaf miner damage and 89.73–99.36% reduction in leaf miner population.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture reduced leaf miner damage by 48.66–78.28%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC mixturee0
- Interactor
- leaf minere0pest
- Outcome
- leaf miner damagee0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 48.66–78.28%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC mixture 100% reduction of S. litura to an extent of 48.66–78.28% reduction of leaf miner damage and 89.73–99.36% reduction in leaf miner population.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture reduced leaf miner population by 89.73–99.36%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC mixturee0
- Interactor
- leaf minere0pest
- Outcome
- leaf miner populatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 89.73–99.36%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC mixture 100% reduction of S. litura to an extent of 48.66–78.28% reduction of leaf miner damage and 89.73–99.36% reduction in leaf miner population.”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The mixture caused no phytotoxicity symptoms.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole + abamectine0
- Outcome
- phytotoxicity symptomse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In T. urticae population Chlorantraniliprole + abamectin did not cause any phytotoxicity symptoms.”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →abamectin · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.