Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole plus lambda cyhalothrin was most effective against H. armigera larvae.

A claim from Bioefficacy of Certain Combination Insecticides against Insect Pests in Tomato · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole plus lambda cyhalothrin was most effective against H. armigera larvae.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 10%+Lambda cyhalothrin 5% ZC 250 ml/hae0
Interactor
H. armigerae0pest
Outcome
larval population of H. armigerae0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78
e0

“Chlorantraniliprole 10%+Lambda cyhalothrin 5% ZC 250 ml/ha was most effective and found Triazophos 35%+ Deltamehtrin 1% EC 100ml/ha least effective against larval population of H. armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1141

Title

Bioefficacy of Certain Combination Insecticides against Insect Pests in Tomato

Shivam Kumar; Sameer Kumar Singh; Umesh Chandra Environment and Ecology 2024. doi:10.60151/envec/cqxl9639

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-9839b0d2ebf69b614f82d1c0a059ed68cd5430d972a2c9fcafaf9c46778528bc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

chlorantraniliprole · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.