Abstract
Field trial was conducted at the Central Research Farm, during rabi, 2022-2023. The experiment was laid out in RBD (randomized block design). Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Insecticides with treatment T1 chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:10.) was the best. This was chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC, ½ dose chlorantraniliprole + nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%), spinosad 45%SC, nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%) recorded the least fruit infestation. The highest yield was noticed in chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (240.5 q/ ha), followed by ½ dose chlorantraniliprole + nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC was the best treatment against Helicoverpa armigera.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:10.)e0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerat0pest - Outcome
- was the beste0
- Direction
- was the beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)”
e0“Insecticides with treatment T1 chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:10.) was the best.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC recorded least tomato fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SCe0
- Interactor
- Fruit Borert0
- Outcome
- fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- leaste0
Not reportedInteractor roleComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer”
e0“chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC, ½ dose chlorantraniliprole + nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%), spinosad 45%SC, nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%) recorded the least fruit infestation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Half-dose chlorantraniliprole with nisco sixer plus recorded least fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- ½ dose chlorantraniliprole + nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%)e0
- Interactor
- Fruit Borert0
- Outcome
- fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- leaste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer”
e0“½ dose chlorantraniliprole + nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%), spinosad 45%SC, nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%) recorded the least fruit infestation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45%SC recorded least fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- spinosad 45%SCe0
- Interactor
- Fruit Borert0
- Outcome
- fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- leaste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer”
e0“spinosad 45%SC, nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%) recorded the least fruit infestation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nisco sixer plus recorded least fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%)e0
- Interactor
- Fruit Borert0
- Outcome
- fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- leaste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer”
e0“nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%) recorded the least fruit infestation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC gave the highest tomato yield of 240.5 q/ ha.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SCe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 240.5 q/ hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“The highest yield was noticed in chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (240.5 q/ ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Half-dose chlorantraniliprole plus nisco sixer plus ranked second for tomato yield.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- ½ dose chlorantraniliprole + nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“The highest yield was noticed in chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (240.5 q/ ha), followed by ½ dose chlorantraniliprole + nisco sixer plus 2ml/ l (O. sanctum 13%+ A. nardus 4%).”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →spinosad · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →chlorantraniliprole · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →chlorantraniliprole · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.