Abstract
Effectiveness of selected IPM modules was evaluated against H. armigera on tomato under field conditions at Newly Developmental Farm, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa- Pakistan during 2011. Chinar (F1 hybrid indeterminate) were transplanted in field in randomized complete block design. Eight IPM modules as treatments including control were evaluated and cost benefit ratio of these modules was also evaluated. Except control seven modules were tested with integration of three control strategies i.e., use of pheromone trap, mechanical egg destruction of target pest and use of Trichogramma chilonis as biocontrol agent. Of these seven modules, first six modules also received pesticide of different groups, i.e. Neem seed extract, indoxicarb, emmamectin benzoate, spinosad, lufenuron, chlorantraniliprole respectively. Results revealed that all IPM modules were effective than control, in reducing fruit damage by H. armigera. However, lowest fruit damage (5.74%) and maximum tomato yield (22013 kg ha-1) was obtained in M6, where use of chlorantraniliprole was integrated with other control strategies. The same module also revealed highest cost benefit ratio (1: 6.4). It was concluded that integration of different control measure along with judicial use of pesticide in IPM program not only reduced fruit losses but also increased yield and net return.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
All IPM modules reduced fruit damage by H. armigera compared with control.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- IPM modulese1
- Interactor
- H. armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae1pest - Outcome
- fruit damagee1
- Direction
- reducinge1
- Comparator
- controle1
- Setting
- field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Effectiveness of selected IPM modules was evaluated against H. armigera on tomato under field conditions at Newly Developmental Farm”
e1“all IPM modules were effective than control, in reducing fruit damage by H. armigera”
t0“Evaluation of Some Selected Ipm Modules for the Management of Tomato Fruit Worm (Helicoverpa Armigera Hub.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Module M6 with chlorantraniliprole gave the lowest fruit damage, 5.74%.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- use of chlorantraniliprolee2
- Outcome
- lowest fruit damagee2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Value
- 5.74%e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“lowest fruit damage (5.74%) and maximum tomato yield (22013 kg ha-1) was obtained in M6, where use of chlorantraniliprole was integrated with other control strategies”
t0“Evaluation of Some Selected Ipm Modules for the Management of Tomato Fruit Worm (Helicoverpa Armigera Hub.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Module M6 with chlorantraniliprole gave the maximum tomato yield, 22013 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- use of chlorantraniliprolee2
- Outcome
- tomato yielde2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 22013 kg ha-1e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“lowest fruit damage (5.74%) and maximum tomato yield (22013 kg ha-1) was obtained in M6, where use of chlorantraniliprole was integrated with other control strategies”
t0“Evaluation of Some Selected Ipm Modules for the Management of Tomato Fruit Worm (Helicoverpa Armigera Hub.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Module M6 with chlorantraniliprole had the highest cost benefit ratio, 1:6.4.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- use of chlorantraniliprolee2
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 1: 6.4e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“lowest fruit damage (5.74%) and maximum tomato yield (22013 kg ha-1) was obtained in M6, where use of chlorantraniliprole was integrated with other control strategies”
e3“The same module also revealed highest cost benefit ratio (1: 6.4)”
t0“Evaluation of Some Selected Ipm Modules for the Management of Tomato Fruit Worm (Helicoverpa Armigera Hub.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated control with judicious pesticide use in the IPM program increased yield and net return.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- integration of different control measure along with judicial use of pesticidee4
- Outcome
- yield and net returne4
- Direction
- increasede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“integration of different control measure along with judicial use of pesticide in IPM program not only reduced fruit losses but also increased yield and net return”
t0“Evaluation of Some Selected Ipm Modules for the Management of Tomato Fruit Worm (Helicoverpa Armigera Hub.)”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →chlorantraniliprole · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →insecticide · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →ipm · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.