Paper · 2024 · South African Journal of Botany

Effect of herbal application on browning inhibition and physico-chemical quality of pear (Pyrus communis) slices

Sathya R; Prasad Rasane; Aishvina Singh; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The main objective of the research study is to evaluate the effect of herbs ( O. basilicum, O. vulgare, C. sinensis) extract-coated pear slices on its physiochemical quality attributes, discoloration rate, and browning enzyme activity in comparison with chemical (ascorbic acid) coated pear slices over 15 days at 4 ± 1 ℃. A significant difference ( p < 0.05) between herbs and ascorbic acid-coated pear slices was obtained in terms of physiochemical quality attributes, whereby the highest variation was obtained in uncoated pear slices (control) and the least variation was observed in herbs-coated pear slices, more specifically C. sinensis spray, and dip (6 min) extract showed the highest inhibition of PPO/POD activity and the minimum browning index was noticeable throughout 15 days of storage. These findings showed that herbal extract coating application to fresh-cut pears might be a desirable strategy to alleviate discoloration, also considered to be an effective alternative to chemical coating.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herb-coated pear slices varied least in physicochemical quality compared with uncoated and ascorbic acid coated slices.

Taxon
Pyrus communisPyrus communist0
Treatment
herbs-coated pear slicese0
Outcome
physiochemical quality attributese0
Direction
least variatione0
Comparator
uncoated pear slices (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant difference ( p < 0.05) between herbs and ascorbic acid-coated pear slices was obtained in terms of physiochemical quality attributes, whereby the highest variation was obtained in uncoated pear slices (control) and the least variation was observed in herbs-coated pear slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear (Pyrus communis) slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. sinensis spray and six-minute dip extracts inhibited PPO/POD activity most and minimized browning over 15 days.

Taxon
Pyrus communisPyrus communist0
Treatment
C. sinensis spray, and dip (6 min) extracte0
Outcome
PPO/POD activity and the minimum browning indexe0
Direction
highest inhibitione0
Qualifier
throughout 15 days of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. sinensis spray, and dip (6 min) extract showed the highest inhibition of PPO/POD activity and the minimum browning index was noticeable throughout 15 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear (Pyrus communis) slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–112 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.