Paper · 2024 · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal

Effect of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Weed Dynamics, Growth Performance and Yield of Direct Sown Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)

A. Gnana Vinoba; R. Mohanapriya; P. Srinithi

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Finger millet is an important dryland crops since they can tolerate unfavorable weather and are frequently planted in soils with low nutrient and poor water holding capacity in soils. The main cause for yield loss is weed infestation which occurs in finger millet. Several integrated weed management techniques were carried out to control them particularly and to increase yield which benefits farmers. Methods: In this context a field experiment was conducted in Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, during Rabi season of 2022-23 in direct sown finger millet under irrigated condition. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with ten treatments and three replications viz., PE pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Hand weeding @ 35 DAS, PoE 2,4-D @ 2 kg ha-1 40 DAS + Hand weeding @ 35 DAS, PE pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Hand weeding @ 35 DAS, PoE 2,4-D @ 2 kg ha-1 40 DAS + Twin wheel hoe @ 30 DAS, PE pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe @ 30 DAS, PE pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe @ 30 DAS, Hand weeding @ 25 and 40 DAS, Twin wheel hoe @ 25 and 40 DAS, Hand weeding @ 25 DAS + Twin wheel hoe @ 40 DAS and Unweeded control. The CO 14 finger millet was used a test variety with 110 days medium duration. Result: The result showed that pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control. The same treatment combination recorded higher plant height (115.8 cm) and grain yield (2368 kg ha-1) at harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus hoeing significantly decreased weed density.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanae0t0e1
Treatment
pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DASe0t0e1
Interactor
weedse0t0e1weed
Outcome
weed densitye0t0e1
Direction
decreasede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus hoeing significantly decreased the weed importance value index.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanae0t0e1
Treatment
pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DASe0t0e1
Interactor
weedse0t0e1weed
Outcome
importance value indexe0t0e1
Direction
decreasede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus hoeing significantly decreased the summed dominance ratio of weeds.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanae0t0e1
Treatment
pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DASe0t0e1
Interactor
weedse0t0e1weed
Outcome
summed dominance ratio of weedse0t0e1
Direction
decreasede0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus hoeing gave higher weed control.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanae0t0e1
Treatment
pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DASe0t0e1
Interactor
weedse0t0e1weed
Outcome
weed controle0t0e1
Direction
highere0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same weed-management treatment produced higher plant height of 115.8 cm.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanae0t0e1
Organ / stage
harveste0t0e1
Treatment
pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DASe0t0e1
Outcome
plant heighte0t0e1
Direction
highere0t0e1
Value
115.8 cme0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment combination recorded higher plant height (115.8 cm) and grain yield (2368 kg ha-1) at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced higher grain yield of 2368 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanae0t0e1
Organ / stage
harveste0t0e1
Treatment
pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DASe0t0e1
Outcome
grain yielde0t0e1
Direction
highere0t0e1
Value
2368 kg ha-1e0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment combination recorded higher plant height (115.8 cm) and grain yield (2368 kg ha-1) at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-emergence pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha-1 8 DAS + Twin wheel hoe weeding @ 30 DAS significantly decreased weed density, importance value index and summed dominance ratio of weeds with higher weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1515 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Pretilachlor · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

herbicide · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · weed · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.