Abstract
Aims: Anthracnose poses a significant threat to green gram cultivation in India. This study focused on evaluating various bioagents and cultivars efficacy in combating Collectotrichum lindemuthianum through in vitro bioassays and glasshouse investigations. Study Design: Dual culture technique and screening of varieties Place and Duration of Study: The laboratory studies were conducted in the Department of Plant Pathology, N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat, India during 2020–2021. Methodology: The dual culture method was employed to gauge the potency of biocontrol agents, while variety screening helped to identify resistant and susceptible green gram varieties against C. lindemuthianum. Results: In vitro assessments revealed that among the five biocontrol agents tested, Trichoderma virens (87.63%) and T. viride (85.41%) exhibited significant suppression of mycelial growth compared to the untreated control. However, in greenhouse pot culture experiments involving eight different genotypes, none were found to be immune to green gram anthracnose. Nevertheless, Pusa 1431, KM-2328, TARM-18, and GM 6 exhibited a resistant response against anthracnose, while BPMR-145 and Vaibhav proved susceptible to the disease. Conclusion: Biocontrol agents are cost-effective and safe for disease management, while integrating resistant varieties is a solid strategy. These high-yielding, environmentally safe, and economically viable methods benefit farmers. Recognizing resistant genotypes is crucial for breeding disease-resistant varieties, as they limit field spread and reduce conidia production of C. lindemuthianum causing green gram anthracnose.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma virens suppressed pathogen mycelial growth by 87.63% versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- Green Gram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- Trichoderma virense0
- Interactor
- Trichoderma virensTrichoderma virense0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- mycelial growthe0
- Direction
- suppressione0
- Value
- 87.63%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Trichoderma virens (87.63%) and T. viride (85.41%) exhibited significant suppression of mycelial growth compared to the untreated control”
t0“Green Gram”
Claim · model-written summary
T. viride suppressed pathogen mycelial growth by 85.41% versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- Green GramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- T. viridee0
- Interactor
- T. viride
Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- mycelial growthe0
- Direction
- suppressione0
- Value
- 85.41%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trichoderma virens (87.63%) and T. viride (85.41%) exhibited significant suppression of mycelial growth compared to the untreated control”
t0“Green Gram”
Claim · model-written summary
None of eight tested green gram genotypes was immune to anthracnose.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Outcome
- none were found to be immune to green gram anthracnosee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“none were found to be immune to green gram anthracnose”
Claim · model-written summary
Pusa 1431, KM-2328, TARM-18, and GM 6 showed resistance to anthracnose.
- Taxon
- Green GramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Material
- Pusa 1431, KM-2328, TARM-18, and GM 6e0
- Outcome
- resistant response against anthracnosee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pusa 1431, KM-2328, TARM-18, and GM 6 exhibited a resistant response against anthracnose”
t0“Green Gram”
Claim · model-written summary
BPMR-145 and Vaibhav were susceptible to anthracnose.
- Taxon
- Green GramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Material
- BPMR-145 and Vaibhave0
- Outcome
- susceptible to the diseasee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“BPMR-145 and Vaibhav proved susceptible to the disease”
t0“Green Gram”
The same questions in other papers
Trichoderma virens · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
Trichoderma viride · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.