Paper · 2024 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Cover crop management strategies affect weeds and profitability of organic no-till soybean

Madhav Dhakal; Yichao Rui; Annie R. Benson; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Cover crop residue retention on the soil surface can suppress weeds and improve organic no-till soybean ( Glycine max ) yield and profitability compared to a tilled system. Appropriate cereal rye ( Secale cereale ) fall planting date and termination methods in the spring are critical to achieve these benefits. A plot-scale agronomic experiment was carried out from September 2018 to October 2021 in Kutztown, PA, USA to demonstrate the influence of cereal rye planting date (September or October) and mechanical termination method [no-till (I & J roller-crimper, Dawn ZRX roller, and mow-ted) and tilled (plow-cultivate)] on cover crop regrowth density, weed biomass, soybean yield, and economic returns. In one out of three years, the September rye planting accumulated more cover crop biomass than the October planting, but the regrowth of the rye after roller-crimping was greater with this planting date. Cover crop planting date had no effect on total weed biomass and demonstrated varying effects on soybean grain yield and economic returns. The Dawn ZRX roller outperformed the I & J roller-crimper in effectively terminating cover crops, while the I & J roller-crimper demonstrated more uniform weed suppression and led to greater soybean yields over a span of three years. Organic no-till strategies eliminated the need for tillage and reduced variable costs by 14% over plow-cultivated plots, and generated ~19% greater net revenue across the study period (no-till vs tillage = US $845 vs US $711 ha −1 ). Terminating cereal rye with roller-crimping technology can be a positive investment in an organic soybean production system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In one of three years, September-planted cereal rye accumulated more cover crop biomass than October-planted rye.

Treatment
September rye plantinge0
Outcome
cover crop biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
In one out of three yearse0
Comparator
October plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In one out of three years, the September rye planting accumulated more cover crop biomass than the October planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regrowth of the rye after roller-crimping was greater with the September planting date.

Treatment
this planting datee0
Outcome
regrowth of the ryee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the regrowth of the rye after roller-crimping was greater with this planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop planting date had no effect on total weed biomass.

Taxon
Cover crope0
Treatment
Cover crop planting datee0
Outcome
total weed biomasse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crop planting date had no effect on total weed biomass and demonstrated varying effects on soybean grain yield and economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop planting date had varying effects on soybean grain yield and economic returns.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Cover crop planting datee0
Outcome
soybean grain yield and economic returnse0
Direction
varying effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crop planting date had no effect on total weed biomass and demonstrated varying effects on soybean grain yield and economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Dawn ZRX roller outperformed the I & J roller-crimper in effectively terminating cover crops.

Taxon
cover cropse0
Treatment
Dawn ZRX rollere0
Outcome
terminating cover cropse0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
I & J roller-crimpere0

Verbatim

e0

“The Dawn ZRX roller outperformed the I & J roller-crimper in effectively terminating cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I & J roller-crimper gave more uniform weed suppression.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
I & J roller-crimpere0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
uniform weed suppressione0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the I & J roller-crimper demonstrated more uniform weed suppression and led to greater soybean yields over a span of three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I & J roller-crimper led to greater soybean yields over three years.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
I & J roller-crimpere0
Outcome
soybean yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
over a span of three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the I & J roller-crimper demonstrated more uniform weed suppression and led to greater soybean yields over a span of three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic no-till strategies reduced variable costs by 14% compared with plow-cultivated plots.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Organic no-till strategiese0
Outcome
variable costse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
plow-cultivated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Organic no-till strategies eliminated the need for tillage and reduced variable costs by 14% over plow-cultivated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till generated about 19% greater net revenue than tillage across the study period (US $845 vs US $711 per ha).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
net revenuee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
~19%e0
Qualifier
US $845 vs US $711e0
Comparator
tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“generated ~19% greater net revenue across the study period (no-till vs tillage = US $845 vs US $711”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1517 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that terminating cereal rye with roller-crimping can be a positive investment in organic soybean production.

Taxon
cereal ryee0
Outcome
positive investmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Terminating cereal rye with roller-crimping technology can be a positive investment in an organic soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1650 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.