Paper · 2023 · Journal of Arable Crops and Marketing

Genetic Diversity Studies in Durum Wheat (Triticum durum L.) Accessions

Ghulam Sajjad Kaleri; Shabana Memon; Asif Ali Kaleri; et al.

16
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Genetic diversity among durum wheat tetraploid species has a premium to understand the diversity within the genotypes. This study’s major objective was to learn more about the diversity and relationships between various durum genotypes. The experiment was design randomized complete block design with three replications. In this study, a total of eight durum advance lines, namely DW-1, DW-2, DW-3, DW-4, DW-5, DW-6, DW-7, and DW-8, were included with one Durum check wheat Miki3 and spring wheat Khirman to investigate the interrelationship and genetic diversity of quantitative traits and they ‘reaming these traits. For nearly all of the features, the analysis of variance revealed considerable variations among the durum advance lines, as evidenced by the significant mean squares at a probability level of P≤0.01. The mean performance results indicated variations in genotype performance DW8 exhibited maximum days to heading, tallest plant height (cm), and shortest peduncle length was measured in durum wheat. DW6 attained shorter plant height was recorded as compared to both check varieties. A notable variation was detected among the genotypes concerning the trait "number of tillers per m2". The genotype with the highest number of tillers appeared to be spring wheat and the minimum number of tillers was recorded in DW4, respectively. Significantly maximum number of spikelet’s, per spike-1,biological yield plant-1 and protein content % were observed in DW3, amount of grains spike-1 were significant in DW6, main spike yield per plant (g) was recorded in DW3. Whereas minimum grains spike-1and minimum spike yield was observed in DW9, respectively. Grain yield plot-1 (2.3333 kg) was observed significantly higher in DW6 and minimum Grain yield plot-1 (1.6667 kg) in DW10 was observed. Regards correlation, Grain yield plant-1 revealed there was a positive and significant correlation with respect to the trait "days to75% headline, days to 75% maturity, grains Spike-1, main spike yield-1 and 1000-Grain Weight (g) (r=0.500**, r=0.679**, r=0.316*, r=0.316*, r=0.533** and r=0.308*). Using UPGMA, two members of cluster 1 and cluster 2 were found to have closer relationship with different durum genotypes. However, miki 3 had closer relation with DW-8. The largest positive PCA loadings were observed in grains yield plant-1 and 1000 grains weight for the second, third, fourth and fifth PCA group. Hence, DW-8 was nearer relation with miki3, and DW-3, DW-10 and DW-6 considered the best genotypes according to performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The durum advanced lines differed significantly for nearly all assessed features.

Material
durum advance linese0
Outcome
considerable variationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For nearly all of the features, the analysis of variance revealed considerable variations among the durum advance lines, as evidenced by the significant mean squares at a probability level of P≤0.01”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DW8 had maximum days to heading and plant height and shortest peduncle length.

Material
DW8e0
Outcome
maximum days to heading, tallest plant height (cm), and shortest peduncle lengthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DW8 exhibited maximum days to heading, tallest plant height (cm), and shortest peduncle length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DW6 was shorter than both check varieties.

Material
DW6e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
both check varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DW6 attained shorter plant height was recorded as compared to both check varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiller number per area varied among genotypes.

Outcome
number of tillers per m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A notable variation was detected among the genotypes concerning the trait "number of tillers per m2"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring wheat had the highest tiller number.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype with the highest number of tillers appeared to be spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1278 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DW4 had the lowest tiller number.

Material
DW4e0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum number of tillers was recorded in DW4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DW3 had maximum spikelet number, biological yield, protein content, and main spike yield.

Material
DW3e0
Outcome
number of spikelet’s, per spike-1,biological yield plant-1 and protein content %e0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly maximum number of spikelet’s, per spike-1,biological yield plant-1 and protein content % were observed in DW3, amount of grains spike-1 were significant in DW6, main spike yield per plant (g) was recorded in DW3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DW6 had significantly high grains per spike.

Material
DW6e0
Outcome
amount of grains spike-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amount of grains spike-1 were significant in DW6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DW9 had minimum grains per spike and spike yield.

Material
DW9e0
Outcome
grains spike-1and minimum spike yielde0
Direction
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum grains spike-1and minimum spike yield was observed in DW9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DW6 grain yield per plot was significantly higher at 2.3333 kg.

Material
DW6e0
Outcome
Grain yield plot-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.3333 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield plot-1 (2.3333 kg) was observed significantly higher in DW6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DW10 had minimum grain yield per plot at 1.6667 kg.

Material
DW10e0
Outcome
Grain yield plot-1e0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.6667 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum Grain yield plot-1 (1.6667 kg) in DW10 was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield per plant correlated positively and significantly with several maturity and yield traits.

Organ / stage
days to 75% maturitye0
Outcome
Grain yield plant-1e0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
significant correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield plant-1 revealed there was a positive and significant correlation with respect to the trait "days to75% headline, days to 75% maturity, grains Spike-1, main spike yield-1 and 1000-Grain Weight (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–2030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UPGMA placed members of clusters 1 and 2 in closer relationship.

Taxon
durume0
Outcome
closer relationshipe0
Comparator
different durum genotypese0

Verbatim

e0

“Using UPGMA, two members of cluster 1 and cluster 2 were found to have closer relationship with different durum genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2099–2220 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Miki 3 was closer to DW-8.

Material
DW-8e0
Outcome
closer relatione0
Comparator
miki 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“miki 3 had closer relation with DW-8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and 1000 grain weight had the largest positive PCA loadings in groups two to five.

Outcome
PCA loadingse0
Direction
largest positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest positive PCA loadings were observed in grains yield plant-1 and 1000 grains weight for the second, third, fourth and fifth PCA group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2269–2413 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

DW-3, DW-10 and DW-6 were considered the best genotypes for performance.

Material
DW-3, DW-10 and DW-6e0
Outcome
best genotypes according to performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DW-3, DW-10 and DW-6 considered the best genotypes according to performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2463–2538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑